Cited by 43Food composition and propertiesPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsProteins in Food Systems

Characterisation, in vitro digestibility and expected glycemic index of commercial starches as uncooked ingredients

Open access
Romano, Annalisa, Mackie, Alan, Farina, Federica, Aponte, Maria, Sarghini, Fabrizio, Masi, Paolo·2016·Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

In this study native starches as ingredients (corn, rice, wheat, tapioca and potato) were characterized for microstructure, physicochemical, functional and thermal properties, in vitro digestibility and glycemic index. There was a significant variation in the granule shape and size distribution of the starches. Particle size monomodal (corn, tapioca, potato) and bimodal (rice, wheat) distribution was observed amongst the starches. The potato starch showed the biggest size granules while the rice showed the smallest. The examined properties and nutritional characteristics of starches were significantly different. Thermal properties were studied using Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC). DSC results showed that the transition temperatures (58.8-78.7 °C) and enthalpies of gelatinization (2.3-8.2 J/g) of the starches appeared to be greatly influenced by microstructure and chemical composition (e.g. resistant starch). Nutritional properties such as slowly digestible starch and expected glycemic index values followed the order: rice > wheat > tapioca > corn > potato. In particular, the highest resistant starch was recorded for potato starch.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-016-2375-9

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nutritional value of grains is dictated by multiple factors, including grain particle size (degree of processing) and preparation method (cooking).

    “However, the nutritional value of grains is dictated by multiple factors, including grain particle size (ie, degree of processing) and preparation method (ie, cooking).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McCleary BV, Monaghan DA (2002) Measurement of resistant starch. J AOAC Int 85(3):665-675. 18 41 42
  2. Moorthy SN (2002) Physicochemical and functional properties of tropical tuber starches: a review. 21 48 49
  3. Olayemi OJ, Oyi AR, Allagh TS (2008) Comparative evaluation of maize, rice and wheat starch 4 7 powders as pharmaceutical excipients. Niger J Pharm Sci 7(1):131-138. 5 9 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romano, A., Mackie, A., Farina, F., Aponte, M., Sarghini, F., & Masi, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Norwich Research Park (GB)
Corresponding author
Romano, Annalisa
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2016-12
Volume
53
Issue
12
Pages
4126-4134
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W2566387396
Cited by
43
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J004545/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
native starch, in vitro digestibility, glycemic index, starch granule size distribution, starch microstructure, gelatinization, resistant starch, slowly digestible starch, corn starch, rice starch, wheat starch, cassava starch, potato starch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review