Cited by 34Algal biology and biofuel productionAquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in airlift photobioreactor with transparent draft tube: effect of hydrodynamics, light and carbon dioxide on biochemical profile particularly ω-6/ω-3 fatty acid ratio

Open access
Madhubalaji, C. K., Sarat Chandra, T, Chauhan, V. S., Sarada, R., Mudliar, Sandeep N.·2020·Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

Chlorella vulgaris is used for food and feed applications due to its nutraceutical, antioxidant and anticancer properties. An airlift photobioreactor comprising transparent draft tube was used for C. vulgaris cultivation. The effect of reactor parameters like hydrodynamics (0.3-1.5 vvm), light intensity (85-400 μmol m-2 s-1), photoperiod (12-24 h) and gas-phase carbon dioxide (CO 2) concentration (5-15% v/v) were evaluated on microalgae and associated bacterial growth, biochemical profile; with special emphasis on ω-3, ω-6 fatty acids, and vitamin B 12. The optimal growth of C. vulgaris without CO 2 supplementation was observed at 1.2 vvm, which was associated with higher algal productivity, chlorophyll, vitamin B 12 content, and bacterial load along with 72% of nitrate removal. The higher light intensity (400 μmol m-2 s-1) and photoperiod (24:0) increased biomass productivity and ω-3 fatty acid content (in lipid) up to 2-3 fold. The elevated levels of gas-phase CO 2 concentration (15% v/v) enhanced EPA content up to 7% and biomass productivity up to 171 mg L-1 day-1. However, the increase in CO 2 concentration lowered vitamin B 12 content (up to 30%) and bacterial load (2-3 log). Also, all the cultivation conditions favoured desirable ω-6/ω-3 ratio(in the range of 1-2).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-019-04118-5

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madhubalaji, C. K., Sarat Chandra, T., Chauhan, V. S., Sarada, R., & Mudliar, S. N.
Affiliations
Central Food Technological Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Mudliar, Sandeep N.
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2019-10-12
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
866-876
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W2979677088
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (BT/PR6552/PBD/26/360/2012)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Chlorella vulgaris, airlift photobioreactor, hydrodynamics, gas velocity, light intensity, photoperiod, CO2 concentration, n-6/n-3 ratio, omega-3 fatty acids, EPA, vitamin B12, bacterial load, nitrate removal, microalgae cultivation, biomass productivity, microalgal lipids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review