Cited by 142Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Improving CO2 fixation efficiency by optimizing Chlorella PY-ZU1 culture conditions in sequential bioreactors

Cheng, Jun, Huang, Yun, Feng, Jia, Sun, Jing, Zhou, Junhu, Cen, Kefa·2013·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

To fix CO2 emissions efficiently from flue gas of coal-fired power plants, the culture medium, light intensity and bioreactors were comprehensively optimized in the process of CO2 fixation by Chlorella PY-ZU1. To make up for relative insufficiency of nutrients (except for the carbon source) resulting from continuous bubbling of 15% CO2, three chemicals were added into the culture to optimize the molar ratios of nitrogen to carbon, phosphorus to carbon, and magnesium to carbon in culture from 0.17 to 0.69, from 0.093 to 0.096, and from 0.018 to 0.030, respectively. Such adjustments led to a 1.25-fold increase in biomass (from 2.41 to 5.42 g L(-1)). By enhancing light intensity from 4500 to 6000 lux, the peak growth rate of Chlorella PY-ZU1 increased by 99% and reached to 0.95 g L(-1) day(-1). Use of a multi-stage sequential bioreactor notably improved the peak CO2 fixation efficiency to 85.6%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.122

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, J., Huang, Y., Feng, J., Sun, J., Zhou, J., & Cen, K.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (CN)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Jun
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
144
Pages
321-327
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000848305
Cited by
142
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51176163)
  • International Sci. & Tech. Cooperation Program of China (2012DFG61770, 2010DFA72730)
  • National High Technology R&D Program of China (2012AA050101)
  • National Key Technology R&D Program of China (2011BAD14B02)
  • Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20110101110021)
  • Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0446)
  • Key Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Z1090532)
  • Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Province (1346011-1)
  • Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to University (B08026)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
CO2 fixation, flue gas, coal-fired power plant emissions, culture medium optimization, nitrogen to carbon ratio, light intensity, microalgal biomass, CO2 capture
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Chlorella, Chlorophyll, Culture Media, Light, Magnesium, Nitrates, Phosphates, Time Factors, Biomass, Cell Culture Techniques, Bioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review