Cited by 18Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Coverage of infertility treatment and fertility outcomes

Open access
Machado, Matilde P., Sanz-de-Galdeano, Anna·2015·SERIEs

Abstract

Policy interventions that increase insurance coverage for infertility treatments may affect fertility trends, and ultimately, population age structures. However, such policies have ignored the overall impact of coverage on fertility. We examine short-term and long-term effects of increased insurance coverage for infertility on the timing of first births and on women’s total fertility rates. Our main contribution is to show that infertility mandates enacted in the United States during the 80s and 90s did not increase the total fertility rates of women by the end of their reproductive lives. We also show evidence that these mandates induced women to put off motherhood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13209-015-0135-0

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machado and Sanz-de-Galdeano (2015) found no effects of cheaper infertility treatment on the probability of having at least one child by age 35.

    “In contrast, Machado and Sanz-de-Galdeano (2015) found no effects on the probability of having at least one child by age 35, when the need for fertility treatment is substantially lower.”

    From Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature (2021) · cites this paper as Machado and Sanz-de-Galdeano (2015)

    Section 4.1 (page unavailable) says most estimated effects on the probability of having at least one child by age 35 were not statistically significant. But Table 3 reports two statistically significant negative estimates, so the unqualified statement that the authors found no effects overstates the result. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Buckles K (2005) Stopping the biological clock: infertility treatments and the career-family tradeoff. BU dissertation
  2. Gruber J (2004) Is making divorce easier bad for children? J Labor Econ 22(4):799-833

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Machado, M. P., & Sanz-de-Galdeano, A.
Affiliations
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Machado, Matilde P.
Venue
SERIEs
Published
2015-11
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
407-439
ISSN
  • 1869-4187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-4195
OpenAlex
W2180722343
Cited by
18
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SERIEs (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Science Technology (SEJ2007-66268)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) (ECO2010-20504, ECO2011-28822)
  • Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (SEJ2007-62500)
  • Generalitat de Catalunya (ES) (2009SGR189)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
infertility treatment, insurance coverage, fertility rate, timing of first birth, fertility policy, age structure, delayed childbearing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review