Differentiating pheochromocytoma from lipid-poor adrenocortical adenoma by CT texture analysis: feasibility study
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the feasibility of using CT texture analysis (CTTA) to differentiate pheochromocytoma from lipid-poor adrenocortical adenoma (lp-ACA).Methods Ninety-eight pheochromocytomas and 66 lp-ACAs were included in this retrospective study. CTTA was performed on unenhanced and enhanced images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for texture parameters that were significantly different for the objective. Diagnostic accuracies were evaluated using the cutoff values of texture parameters with the highest AUCs.Results Compared to lp-ACAs, pheochromocytomas had significantly higher mean gray-level intensity (Mean), entropy, and mean of positive pixels (MPP), but lower skewness and kurtosis on unenhanced images (P < 0.001). On enhanced images, these texture-quantifiers followed a similar trend where Mean, entropy, and MPP were higher, but skewness and kurtosis were lower in pheochromocytomas. Standard deviation (SD) was also significantly higher in pheochromocytomas on enhanced images. Mean and MPP quantified from no filtration on unenhanced CT images yielded the highest AUC of 0.86 ± 0.03 (95% CI 0.81-0.91) at a cutoff value of 34.0 for Mean and MPP, respectively (sensitivity = 79.6%, specificity = 83.3%, accuracy = 81.1%).Conclusions It was feasible to use CTTA to differentiate pheochromocytoma from lp-ACA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a feasibility study of 164 patients with indeterminate adrenal lesions at CT, intralesion textural features extracted from unenhanced images allowed differentiation between adenoma and pheochromocytoma with an accuracy of 81%.
“In a feasibility study of 164 patients with indeterminate adrenal lesions at CT (98 pheochromocytoma; 66 lipid-poor adrenal adenomas), intralesion textural features (mean gray-level intensity and mean positive pixels) extracted from unenhanced images allowed differentiation between adenoma and pheochromocytoma with an accuracy of 81% (378).”
From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [378]
Cites
The Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Mass
Young, W. F. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp065470 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?
Davnall, F., Yip, C. S. P., Ljungqvist, G., Selmi, M., Ng, F., Sanghera, B., Ganeshan, B., Miles, K. A., Cook, G. J., & Goh, V. (2012) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series
Bovio, S., Cataldi, A., Reimondo, G., Sperone, P., Novello, S., Berruti, A., Borasio, P., Fava, C., Dogliotti, L., Scagliotti, G. V., et al. (2006) · Journal of Endocrinological Investigation · doi:10.1007/bf03344099 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature
Boland, G. W., Lee, M. J., Gazelle, G. S., Halpern, E. F., McNicholas, M. M., & Mueller, P. R. (1998) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648789 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Zeiger, M. A., Thompson, G. B., Duh, Q.-Y., Hamrahian, A. H., Angelos, P., Elaraj, D., Fishman, E., Kharlip, J., Zeiger, M. A., Thompson, G. B., et al. (2009) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.15.s1.1 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Histopathologic Correlates for Texture Parameters at CT
Ganeshan, B., Goh, V., Mandeville, H., Ng, Q. S., Hoskin, P., & Miles, K. A. (2012) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.12112428 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Ng, F., Ganeshan, B., Kozarski, R., Miles, K. A., & Goh, V. (2012) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.12120254 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: what do the measurements mean?
Miles, K. A., Ganeshan, B., & Hayball, M. P. (2013) · Cancer Imaging · doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2013.9045 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Hodgdon, T., McInnes, M. D. F., Schieda, N., Flood, T. A., Lamb, L. R., & Thornhill, R. E. (2015) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142215 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Adrenal mass imaging with multidetector CT: pathologic conditions, pearls, and pitfalls
Johnson, P. T., Horton, K. M., & Fishman, E. K. (2009) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.295095027 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
<b>Low-Density Pheochromocytoma on CT:</b>A Mimicker of Adrenal Adenoma
Blake, M. A., Krishnamoorthy, S. K., Boland, G. W., Sweeney, A. T., Pitman, M. B., Harisinghani, M., Mueller, P. R., & Hahn, P. F. (2003) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811663 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Lattin, G. E., Sturgill, E. D., Tujo, C. A., Marko, J., Sanchez-Maldonado, K. W., Craig, W. D., & Lack, E. E. (2014) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.343130127 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Lubner, M. G., Stabo, N. J., Abel, E. J., del Río, A. M., & Pickhardt, P. J. (2016) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15451 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Patel, J., Davenport, M. S., Cohan, R. H., & Caoili, E. M. (2013) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.12.9620 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Schieda, N., Alrashed, A., Flood, T. A., Samji, K. B., Shabana, W. M., & McInnes, M. D. F. (2016) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15318 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
MRI Texture Analysis Predicts p53 Status in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Dang, M., Lysack, J. T., Wu, T., Matthews, T. W., Chandarana, S. P., Brockton, N. T., Bose, P., Bansal, G., Cheng, H., Mitchell, J. R., et al. (2014) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a4110 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Quantitative CT texture analysis for evaluating histologic grade of urothelial carcinoma
Zhang, G., Sun, H., Shi, B., et al. (2016) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-016-0897-2 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationHayano, K., Tian, F., Kambadakone, A. R., Yoon, S. S., Duda, D. G., Ganeshan, B., & Sahani, D. V. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/rct.0000000000000239 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Tian, F., Hayano, K., Kambadakone, A. R., et al. (2014) · Abdominal Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0318-3 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Cross-sectional imaging work-up of adrenal masses
Korivi, B. R. (2013) · World Journal of Radiology · doi:10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.88 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Adrenal Incidentalomas: Clinical Controversies and Modified Recommendations
Garrett, R. W., Nepute, J., Hayek, M. E., & Albert, S. G. (2016) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15475 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Adrenal Imaging and Intervention
Allen, B. C., & Francis, I. R. (2015) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2015.05.004 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The Electronic Era: Unintended Consequences?
Berquist, T. H. (2015) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15725 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sherlock, M., Scarsbrook, A., Abbas, A., Fraser, S., Limumpornpetch, P., Dineen, R., & Stewart, P. M. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa008 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
“In a feasibility study of 164 patients with indeterminate adrenal lesions at CT (98 pheochromocytoma; 66 lipid-poor adrenal adenomas), intralesion textural features (mean gray-level intensity and mean positive pixels) extracted from unenhanced images allowed differentiation between adenoma and pheochromocytoma with an…”
Background
- Authors
- Zhang, G.-M.-Y., Shi, B., Sun, H., Jin, Z.-Y., & Xue, H.-D.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Hao
- Venue
- Abdominal Radiology
- Published
- 2017-03-29
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2305-2313
- ISSN
- 2366-004X (ISSN-L)
- 2366-0058
- OpenAlex
- W2600355840
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Abdominal Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Health Industry Special Scientific Research Project of China (201402019)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- pheochromocytoma, CT texture analysis, adrenal tumors, differential diagnosis, texture features, entropy (information theory), skewness and kurtosis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Contrast Media, Diagnosis, Differential, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Iohexol, Male, Middle Aged, Pheochromocytoma, Retrospective Studies, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Adrenocortical Adenoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review