Cited by 38Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and Research

Effects of Miglitol, Acarbose, and Sitagliptin on Plasma Insulin and Gut Peptides in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Crossover Study

Open access
Ueno, Hiroaki, Tsuchimochi, Wakaba, Wang, Hong-Wei, Yamashita, Eiichiro, Tsubouchi, Chikako, Nagamine, Kazuhiro, Sakoda, Hideyuki, Nakazato, Masamitsu·2015·Diabetes Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Both dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and α-glucosidase inhibitors (α-GI) have been reported to change the incretin and insulin secretion. To examine the effects of acarbose, miglitol, and sitagliptin on glucose metabolism and secretion of gut peptides, we conducted a crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Eleven Japanese patients with T2DM underwent four meal tolerance tests with single administration of acarbose, miglitol, sitagliptin, or nothing. Fasting and postprandial plasma levels of glucose, insulin, glucagon, active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), ghrelin, and des-acyl ghrelin were measured. RESULTS: Early-phase insulin secretion was reduced following acarbose and miglitol, and the areas under the curve (AUC) of insulin at 180 min following acarbose and miglitol were significantly lower than sitagliptin. AUC of plasma glucose at 180 min after acarbose, miglitol, and sitagliptin tended to be lower than in controls, and plasma glucose levels at 30-60 min following miglitol were significantly lower than in controls. Plasma glucagon, ghrelin, and des-acyl ghrelin levels did not differ among the four conditions. Postprandial plasma active GLP-1 levels and AUC of GLP-1 increased significantly in both the sitagliptin and miglitol groups compared to control. Postprandial plasma total GIP levels increased following sitagliptin but decreased after acarbose and miglitol. Changes in incretin levels tended to be greater with miglitol than acarbose. CONCLUSION: These results showed that sitagliptin and α-GIs, miglitol more so than acarbose, improved hyperglycemia in patients with T2DM after single administration, and had different effects on insulin and incretin secretion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR number, UMIN000009981.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13300-015-0113-3

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GIP and glucagon levels decreased after mixed meal in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics by treatment with single-dose acarbose.

    “There are studies that showed that he GIP and glucagon levels decreased after a mixed meal in patients with new diagnosed type 2 diabetics by treatment with single-dose acarbose[36, 37] and acarbose decreased GIP and glucagon only in a mixed meal test rather than OGTT.[38]”

    From Postprandial Reactive Hypoglycemia (2019) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Methods describe a single acarbose dose before a mixed-meal test, and Results > Gastrointestinal Peptides report lower GIP at 30 minutes than in controls. But Results > Glucose Metabolism report no difference in glucagon among conditions. Results > Baseline Characteristics also show diabetes durations of 3–24 years, so the participants were not newly diagnosed. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ueno, H., Tsuchimochi, W., Wang, H.-W., Yamashita, E., Tsubouchi, C., Nagamine, K., Sakoda, H., & Nakazato, M.
Affiliations
University of Miyazaki (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakazato, Masamitsu
Venue
Diabetes Therapy
Published
2015-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
187-196
ISSN
  • 1869-6953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6961
OpenAlex
W1892082423
Cited by
38
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Research from Miyazaki University Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, miglitol, acarbose, sitagliptin, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, insulin secretion, incretins, glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, ghrelin, des-acyl ghrelin, glucagon, postprandial blood glucose, hyperglycemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review