Cited by 252Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Evidence-Based Psychotherapy: Advantages and Challenges

Open access
Cook, Sarah C., Schwartz, Ann C., Kaslow, Nadine J.·2017·Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Evidence-based psychotherapies have been shown to be efficacious and cost-effective for a wide range of psychiatric conditions. Psychiatric disorders are prevalent worldwide and associated with high rates of disease burden, as well as elevated rates of co-occurrence with medical disorders, which has led to an increased focus on the need for evidence-based psychotherapies. This chapter focuses on the current state of evidence-based psychotherapy. The strengths and challenges of evidence-based psychotherapy are discussed, as well as misperceptions regarding the approach that may discourage and limit its use. In addition, we review various factors associated with the optimal implementation and application of evidence-based psychotherapies. Lastly, suggestions are provided on ways to advance the evidence-based psychotherapy movement to become truly integrated into practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13311-017-0549-4

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. McHugh, R.K., S.W. Whitton, A.D. Peckham, et al., Patient pref- erence for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review. J Clin Psychiatry, 2013. 74: p. 595-602.
  2. Institute of Medicine, ed. Psychosocial interventions for mental and substance use disorders: a framework for establishing evidence- based standards. 2015, The National Academies Press: Washington DC.
  3. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. 2001, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
  4. Edwards, A. and G. Elwyn, Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2009, New York NY: Oxford University Press.
  5. Blease, C.R., S.O. Lilienfeld, and J.M. Kelley, Evidence-based practice and psychological treatments: the imperatives of informed consent. Front Psychol 2016;7:1170.
  6. Roberts, A.R. and K.R. Yeager, Evidence-based practice manual. 2004, New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Beidas, R.S. and P.C. Kendall, Training in evidence-based practice: a review. Clin Psychol (New York) 2010. 17: p. 1-30.
  8. Choudry, N.K., R.H. Fletcher, and S.B. Soumerai, Systemic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of healthcare. Ann Intern Med 2005. 142: p. 260-273.
  9. Norcross, J.C., ed. Psychotherapy relationships that work (Second edition). 2011, Oxford University Press: New York, NY.
  10. VanBuskirk, K.A., Motivational interviewing used in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Behav Med 2014;37:768- 780.
  11. Weisz, J.R. and A.E. Kazdin, eds. Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd edition). The Guilford Press: New York, NY.
  12. McHugh, R.K. and D.H. Barlow, Dissemination and implementa- tion of evidence-based psychological interventions: a review of current efforts. Am Psychol 2010. 65: p. 73-84.
  13. Najavits, L., Seeking safety: A treatment manual for PTSD and substance abuse. 2002, New York: Guilford Press.
  14. Baldwin, S.A. and Z.E. Imel, Therapist effects, in Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th edition), M.J. Lambert, Editor. 2013: New York, NY. p. 258-297.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, S. C., Schwartz, A. C., & Kaslow, N. J.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaslow, Nadine J.
Venue
Neurotherapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
537-545
ISSN
1878-7479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2633878725
Cited by
252
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
evidence-based psychotherapy, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, mental illness, implementation barriers, integration into clinical practice
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychotherapy, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review