Cited by 18Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchForgiveness and Related Behaviors

Core components of moral injury groups co- facilitated by mental health providers and chaplains

Open access
Smigelsky, Melissa A., Trimm, Victoria, Meador, Keith G., Jackson, George L., Wortmann, Jennifer H., Nieuwsma, Jason A.·2022·Spirituality in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Despite increasing interest in moral injury, there is not yet consensus around what it is (and is not), who can have it and under what circumstances, or the degree and form of distress necessary to distinguish moral injury from other psychological and spiritual difficulties. The novelty of moral injury has created space for frontline Veterans Health Administration mental health and spiritual care providers to creatively apply their core professional skills and identities to moral injury. This paper presents findings of a core components analysis (CCA) derived from seven co-led chaplain-mental health moral injury group facilitation teams that were involved in a 16-month quality improvement endeavor of the Dynamic Diffusion Network (DDN). The DDN initiative engages providers in collaborative and iterative refinement of practices to promote rapid improvements in care for complex problems that lack a codified evidence base. Using CCA, we identified 10 core components of co-facilitated moral injury group care. Components include a clear conceptualization of moral injury, an inclusive approach to spirituality, and exploration of forgiveness, among others. This paper offers guidance that can be widely applied and readily adapted as our collective understanding of moral injury continues to expand and clarify. The core components are articulated here as principles for ongoing review and revision in response to future moral injury advances in the DDN and elsewhere.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/scp0000297

Cites

40 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Currier JM, Drescher KD, & Nieuwsma JA (Eds.). (2021). Addressing moral injury in clinical practice. American Psychological Association. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1chrr72
  2. Griffin BJ, Worthington EL, Danish SJ, Donovan J, Lavelock CR, Shaler L, Dees RF, Maguen S, & Davis DE (2017). Self-forgiveness and military service: Equipping warriors to combat moral injury. In Woodyatt L, Worthington EL, Wenzel M, & Griffin BJ (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of self-forgiveness (pp. 221– 234). Springer International Publishing.
  3. Janoff-Bulman R (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. The Free Press.
  4. Meador KG, Nieuwsma JA, & Ethridge K (2017). Chaplaincy and evidence-based mental health care: Promises, pitfalls, and pastoral identity. In Caring for the Human Spirit Magazine (pp. 22– 24). HealthCare Chaplaincy Network.
  5. Moyo H (2015). Pastoral care in the healing of moral injury: A case of the Zimbabwe national liberation war veterans. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 71(2), 11. 10.4102/hts.v71i2.2919 · DOI
  6. Nieuwsma JA, Smigelsky MA, Wortmann JH, Haynes K, & Meador KG (2021). Collaboration with chaplaincy and ministry professionals in addressing moral injury. In Currier JM, Drescher KD, & Nieuwsma JA (Eds.), Addressing moral injury in clinical practice (pp. 243– 260). American Psychological Association.
  7. Roller B, & Nelson V (1993). Cotherapy. In Kaplan HI & Sadock BJ (Eds.), Comprehensive group psychotherapy (3rd ed., pp. 304– 312). Williams & Wilkins Co.
  8. Wenger E, McDermott RA, & Snyder W (2010). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.
  9. Wolfelt A (2005). Companioning the bereaved: A soulful guide for counselors and caregivers. Companion Press.
  10. Worthington EL, Lavelock CR, Witvliet CVO, Rye MS, Tsang J-A, & Toussaint L (2014). Measures of forgiveness: Self-report, physiological, chemical, and behavioral indicators. In Boyle GJ, Saklofske DH, & Matthews G (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 474– 502). Academic Press.
  11. Yalom ID, & Leszcz M (2008). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th edition). Basic Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smigelsky, M. A., Trimm, V., Meador, K. G., Jackson, G. L., Wortmann, J. H., & Nieuwsma, J. A.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
Spirituality in Clinical Practice
Published
2022-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
159-174
ISSN
  • 2326-4500 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-4519
OpenAlex
W4281684156
Cited by
18
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Spirituality in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
US Department of Veterans Affairs (CIN 13-410, QUE 20-012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Keywords
moral injury, chaplaincy, mental health professionals, veterans, spirituality, forgiveness, quality improvement, group facilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review