Cited by 187Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 215 of the 215 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Progression Rates: Implications for Therapeutic Trials

Open access
Duara, Ranjan, Barker, Warren·2022·Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

The clinical presentation and the pathological processes underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be very heterogeneous in severity, location, and composition including the amount and distribution of AB deposition and spread of neurofibrillary tangles in different brain regions resulting in atypical clinical patterns and the existence of distinct AD variants. Heterogeneity in AD may be related to demographic factors (such as age, sex, educational and socioeconomic level) and genetic factors, which influence underlying pathology, the cognitive and behavioral phenotype, rate of progression, the occurrence of neuropsychiatric features, and the presence of comorbidities (e.g., vascular disease, neuroinflammation). Heterogeneity is also manifest in the individual resilience to the development of neuropathology (brain reserve) and the ability to compensate for its cognitive and functional impact (cognitive and functional reserve). The variability in specific cognitive profiles and types of functional impairment may be associated with different progression rates, and standard measures assessing progression may not be equivalent for individual cognitive and functional profiles. Other factors, which may govern the presence, rate, and type of progression of AD, include the individuals' general medical health, the presence of specific systemic conditions, and lifestyle factors, including physical exercise, cognitive and social stimulation, amount of leisure activities, environmental stressors, such as toxins and pollution, and the effects of medications used to treat medical and behavioral conditions. These factors that affect progression are important to consider while designing a clinical trial to ensure, as far as possible, well-balanced treatment and control groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13311-022-01185-z

Cites

215 of 215 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 215 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yashin, 2018, Hidden heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease: insights from genetic association studies and other analyses, Exp Gerontol, 107, 148, 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.020 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Duara, R., & Barker, W.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Barker, Warren
Venue
Neurotherapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
8-25
ISSN
1878-7479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210391623
Cited by
187
References
215
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (1P30AG066506-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, disease heterogeneity, disease progression rate, amyloid-beta deposition, neurofibrillary tangles, atypical presentation, brain reserve, cognitive reserve, functional reserve, neuropsychiatric symptoms, comorbidities, vascular disease, neuroinflammation, genetic factors, demographic factors, lifestyle factors, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review