Cited by 15Ethics, Aesthetics, and ArtDigital Games and MediaPragmatism in Philosophy and Education

Fiction Puzzle: Storiable Challenge in Pragmatist Videogame Aesthetics

Karhulahti, Veli-Matti·2014·Philosophy & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13347-013-0117-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In L.A. Noire, successful interrogations of suspects require constructing coherent sequences of events.

    “storygames like L.A. Noire (Team Bondi 2011) in which successful interrogations of suspects require constructing coherent sequences of events (Karhulahti 2013)”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Karhulahti 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karhulahti, V.-M.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Karhulahti, Veli-Matti
Venue
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2013-08-30
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
201-220
ISSN
  • 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5441
OpenAlex
W2034080579
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Keywords
pragmatist aesthetics, John Dewey, fictional worlds, aesthetic experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review