Cited by 300Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyArt, Technology, and CultureDigital Games and Media

Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies

·2010·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

What matters in understanding digital media? Is looking at the external appearance and audience experience of software enoughor should we look further? In Expressive Processing, Noah Wardrip-Fruin argues that understanding what goes on beneath the surface, the computational processes that make digital media function, is essential. Wardrip-Fruin suggests that it is the authors and artists with knowledge of these processes who will use the potential of computation to define the future of fiction and games. He also explores how computational processes themselves express meanings through distinctive designs, histories, and intellectual kinships that may not be visible to audiences. Wardrip-Fruin looks at expressive processing by examining specific works of digital media ranging from the simulated therapist Eliza and the first major story-generation system Tale-Spin to the complex city-planning game SimCity. Digital media, he contends, offer particularly intelligible examples of things we need to understand about software in general; if we understand, for instance, the capabilities and histories of artificial intelligence techniques in the context of a computer game, we can use that understanding to judge the use of similar techniques in such higher-stakes social contexts as surveillance. Most books on digital media focus on what the machines of digital media look like from the outside but ignore the computational machines that make digital media possible. With this book--the firs…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.47-4465

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In order to understand the meanings created by games, it is usually sufficient to consider the level of mechanics or procedures.

    “But in order to understand the meanings created by games, it is usually sufficient to consider the level of mechanics or procedures (Wardrip-Fruin 2009).”

    From Do We Need Real-Time Hermeneutics? Structures of Meaning in Games (2011) · cites this paper as Wardrip-Fruin 2009

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
08
Pages
47-4465-47-4465
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W611271060
Cited by
297
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
Keywords
digital fiction, video games, software studies, computational processes, artificial intelligence, Eliza, SimCity, story generation, simulation, surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review