Cited by 190Legal Rights and Human RightsLaw, Rights, and FreedomsPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy

Open access
Floridi, Luciano·2016·Philosophy & Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13347-016-0220-8

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Respect for privacy is a necessary condition of human dignity, since personal information can be viewed as constituting an individual, and deprivatising records without consent is likely to constitute a violation of human dignity.

    “Respect for privacy is also a necessary condition of human dignity, since we can view personal information as constituting an individual, and deprivatising records without consent is likely to constitute a violation of human dignity (Floridi 2016).”

    From How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors (2020) · cites this paper as Floridi 2016

  • Privacy can be considered a prerequisite for autonomy.

    “Privacy can be considered a prerequisite for autonomy (cf.Floridi 2016; Wachter 2017).”

    From Ethics of the health-related internet of things: a narrative review (2017) · cites this paper as Floridi 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floridi, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2016-04-26
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
307-312
ISSN
  • 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
  • 2210-5441
OpenAlex
W2344608465
Cited by
190
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
101.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
human dignity, right to privacy, privacy, fundamental rights, moral foundations of rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review