Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI assistants can be considered external factors that affect an individual's cognitive bias and emotions, undermining or manipulating one's intrinsic motivation.
“In a sense, these can be considered external factors that affect an individual’s cognitive bias and emotions undermining or manipulating one’s intrinsic motivation (Vesnic-Alujevic et al., 2020).”
From Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2023) · cites this paper as Vesnic-Alujevic et al., 2020
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774 · see citing works
Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory
Starks, H., & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732307307031 · Cited by 2,528 · see citing works
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159 · see citing works
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017) · International Data Privacy Law · doi:10.1093/idpl/ipx005 · Cited by 1,308 · see citing works
Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science
Jasanoff, S. (2003) · Minerva · doi:10.1023/a:1025557512320 · Cited by 1,004 · see citing works
The social power of algorithms
Beer, D. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.07228 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2017) · doi:10.31228/osf.io/97upg · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical
Floridi, L. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Google DeepMind and healthcare in an age of algorithms
Powles, J., & Hodson, H. (2017) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-017-0179-1 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Zwitter, A. (2014) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951714559253 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars
Stilgoe, J. (2018) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717741687 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Slave to the Algorithm? Why a Right to Explanationn is Probably Not the Remedy You are Looking for
Edwards, L., & Veale, M. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2972855 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy
Floridi, L. (2016) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0220-8 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
The growing ubiquity of algorithms in society: implications, impacts and innovations
Olhede, S. C., & Wolfe, P. J. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0364 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world
Couldry, N., & Yu, J. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818775968 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Prolegomena to a White Paper on an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society
Cowls, J., & Floridi, L. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3198732 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890 · see citing works
Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w · Cited by 1,228 · see citing works
“In a sense, these can be considered external factors that affect an individual’s cognitive bias and emotions undermining or manipulating one’s intrinsic motivation (Vesnic-Alujevic et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSchepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital technologies
Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Singhal, A., Neveditsin, N., Tanveer, H., & Mago, V. (2024) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/50048 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Toward Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (TAI) in the Context of Explainability and Robustness
chander, B., John, C., Warrier, L., & Gopalakrishnan, K. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3675392 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Ulnicane, I., Eke, D. O., Knight, W., Ogoh, G., & Stahl, B. C. (2021) · Interdisciplinary Science Reviews · doi:10.1080/03080188.2020.1840220 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Schiff, D. S. (2023) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12535 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vesnic-Alujevic, L., Nascimento, S., & Pólvora, A.
- Affiliations
- European Commission (BE)
- Venue
- Telecommunications Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 101961
- ISSN
- 0308-5961 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3020321490
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 22.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telecommunications Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
- Keywords
- AI policy, societal impact of AI, AI ethics, machine learning, accountability, transparency, safety, trust, multidisciplinary framework, citizen participation, stakeholder collaboration, anticipatory governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
