The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Ethical challenges include concerns about bias, opacity, and data privacy, particularly in contexts where student data are increasingly used for analytics and monitoring (Ayyoub et al., 2025;Floridi, 2019).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Floridi, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Concerns related to algorithmic bias, data privacy, and transparency are well documented, particularly in relation to vulnerable populations such as children (Floridi, 2019;Jobin et al., 2019).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Floridi, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., et al. (2018) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 · Cited by 4,774
Self-citationDelmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64 · Cited by 3,441 · cited 1×
“In environmental ethics, greenwashing (Delmas and Burbano 2011) is the malpractice of a private or public actor seeking to appear greener, more sustainable, or ecologically friendlier than it actually is.”
BackgroundEstablishing the rules for building trustworthy AI
Floridi, L. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y · Cited by 394
Self-citationWiener, N. (1960) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.131.3410.1355 · Cited by 367 · cited 2×
“In the ethics of AI, see for example (Wiener1960; Samuel 1960).”
BackgroundSoft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation
Floridi, L. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2018.0081 · Cited by 234
Self-citationFloridi, L. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0112 · Cited by 227
Self-citationDistributed Morality in an Information Society
Floridi, L. (2013) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9413-4 · Cited by 201
Self-citationDon’t let industry write the rules for AI
Benkler, Y. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01413-1 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505–528.
- Floridi, L. (2015). The ethics of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mazzini, Gabriele. forthcoming. A system of governance for artificial intelligence through the lens of emerging intersections between AI and EU law. in Digital revolution - new challenges for law, edited by a. De Franceschi, R. Schulze, M. Graziadei, O. Pollicino, F. Riente, S. Sica and P. Sirena. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3369266 .
- Nordling, L. (2018). Europe’s biggest research fund cracks down on “ethics dumping”. Nature, 559(7712), 17. · DOI
- Samuel, A. L. (1960). Some moral and technical consequences of automation—a refutation. Science, 132(3429), 741–742. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019) · Harvard Data Science Review · doi:10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 · Cited by 1,631
Self-citationEthics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1 · Cited by 1,437
“The ethics of artificial intelligence in general has received a great deal of attention, by researchers (e.g., Boddington 2017; Floridi 2019; Jobin et al. 2019; Whittaker et al. 2018; Winfield and Jirotka 2018) All of these efforts principally focus on data (involving issues such as informed…”
BackgroundDecolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence
Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T., & Isaac, W. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8 · Cited by 912
“The counterpoint to ethics dumping is ethics shirking : what is not done to protect people when harms emerge beyond what is demanded from legal or regulatory frameworks (Floridi, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialMorley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5 · Cited by 882
“It is, therefore, a necessary building block in the creation of an environment that fosters ethical, responsible, and beneficial ML, especially as it also indicates the possibility of a time when the distractive risk of ethics shopping 13 (Floridi 2019c) will be lessened.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEthics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-M. (2023) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9 · Cited by 507
“AI companies try to convince people that their behaviors, products, and services are ethical by “Ethics Bluewashing”, but it is not the case [15].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Floridi, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Floridi, Luciano
- ORCID
- Floridi, Luciano
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2019-05-23
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-193
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2944988415
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 66.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- digital ethics, ethical principles, unethical practices, AI ethics, online services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
