Cited by 396Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI

Floridi, Luciano·2019·Nature Machine Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI presents a range of potential future concerns for qualitative research due to its rapid technological advancement, novelty, and social context.

    “AI presents a range of potential future concerns for qualitative research due to its rapid technological advancement, novelty, and social context (Floridi, 2019; McCradden et al., 2020).”
  • The European Commission has provided seven different criteria on the basis of which trustworthiness can be proven.

    “The EC has provided seven different criteria on the basis of which trustworthiness can be proven [13], [14] and these rules were formulated on the basis of three main criteria which are to ensure the transparency, reliability and for the protection of data in models [14].”
  • The technical robustness and safety requirement includes functionalities aligned with preventing unintentional harm and minimizing consequences of intentional harm, including resilience to attacks and security, fallback plans, general safety, and being accurate, reliable and reproducible.

    “This second requirement includes several functionalities all aligned with the prevention of unintentional harm and the minimization of the consequences of intentional harm . These include the resilience of AI-based systems (to attacks and security), ensuring fallback plans (in case something goes wrong), general safety, and being accurate, reliable and reproducible.”
  • Robustness and safety refer to the need of AI systems to be secure, reliable and robust enough to errors and/or inconsistencies in all phases of the life cycle.

    “Robustness and safety refer to the need of AI systems to be secure, reliable and robust enough to errors and/or inconsistencies in all phases of the life cycle [28].”
  • AI is not the 'magic bullet' some would like to believe it is and that AI, just like any other technology, will not only bring forth many benefits but will also be accompanied with a variety of novel ethical, legal, and social challenges.

    “However, it is becoming increasingly evident that AI is not the 'magic bullet' some would like to believe it is and that AI, just like any other technology, will not only bring forth many benefits but will also be accompanied with a variety of novel ethical, legal, and social challenges (Floridi 2019;Floridi et al. 2018).”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Floridi 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floridi, L.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
Nature Machine Intelligence
Published
2019-05-07
Volume
1
Issue
6
Pages
261-262
ISSN
2522-5839 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944176689
Cited by
394
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8
FWCI
49.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
trustworthy AI, AI ethics guidelines, European Commission, responsible AI development, AI regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review