The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving the Black Box Problem: A Normative Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the technical complexity and opacity of algorithmic systems187–189 deprives workers of the ability to understand and master the system that governs their work, which limits their voice and enpowerment172,185,190.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [188]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“In this data-rich environment, tax administrations enjoy conditions that are very favourable to the use of AI technologies: 31 (i) the volume of data is so great that its direct examination is not feasible through human labour; 32 and (ii) the large amounts of data mean that any”
From Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard (2022) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“Information detailing which biomarkers and molecular interactions primarily result in the disease fingerprint is unknown and largely cannot be determined by current machine-learning methods43.”
From Detection of ovarian cancer via the spectral fingerprinting of quantum-defect-modified carbon nanotubes in serum by machine learning (2022) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
“Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-3020 · Cited by 6,682
Marr, D. (1982) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 5,733
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340 · Cited by 5,427
The Mythos of Model Interpretability
Lipton, Z. C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03490 · Cited by 5,422
(1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,269
How the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · cited 4×
“Moreover, in many cases, stakeholders other than developers will require explanations of a particular system ’ s behavior, despite being unwilling or unable to acquire knowledge of learnable parameters (Burrell 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialFodor, J. A. (1987) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001 · Cited by 2,826
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (1993). Discovering complexity: decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research (MIT Press ed.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
- Hupkes, D., Veldhoen, S., & Zuidema, W. (2018). Visualisation and’diagnostic classifiers’ reveal how recurrent and recursive neural networks process hierarchical structure. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 61, 907–926. · DOI · Paper page
- Russell, S.J., Norvig, P. & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI
von Eschenbach, W. J. (2021) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · Cited by 786
Langer, M., Oster, D., Speith, T., Hermanns, H., Kästner, L., Schmidt, E., Sesing, A., & Baum, K. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473 · Cited by 652
Longo, L., Brcic, M., Cabitza, F., Choi, J., Confalonieri, R., Ser, J. D., Guidotti, R., Hayashi, Y., Herrera, F., Holzinger, A., et al. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102301 · Cited by 626
Xu, L., Sanders, L., Li, K., & Chow, J. C. L. (2021) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/27850 · Cited by 571
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w · Cited by 434
Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13337 · Cited by 346
de Fine Licht, K., & de Fine Licht, J. (2020) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w · Cited by 334
“2018) and there are several frameworks that can be used to make AI systems less biased, more fair, etc., (e.g., Binns 2018; Boscoe 2019; Zednik 2019) which might lead to an increase in perceived legitimacy.”
BackgroundDefining the undefinable: the black box problem in healthcare artificial intelligence
Wadden, J. J. (2022) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-107529 · Cited by 224
Kim, M., Chen, C., Wang, P., Mulvey, J. J., Yang, Y., Wun, C., Antman-Passig, M., Luo, H.-B., Cho, S., Long-Roche, K., et al. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00860-y · Cited by 214
Explainable AI for Bioinformatics: Methods, Tools and Applications
Karim, M. R., Islam, T., Shajalal, M., Beyan, O., Lange, C., Cochez, M., Rebholz‐Schuhmann, D., & Decker, S. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad236 · Cited by 220
Should AI models be explainable to clinicians?
Abgrall, G., Holder, A. L., Chelly Dagdia, Z., Zeitouni, K., & Monnet, X. (2024) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-024-05005-y · Cited by 175
How Explainability Contributes to Trust in AI
Ferrario, A., & Loi, M. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533202 · Cited by 163
The risks of using ChatGPT to obtain common safety-related information and advice
Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Peden, A. E., Cole-Hunter, T., Costantini, A., Haghani, M., Rod, J. E., Kelly, S., Torkamaan, H., Tariq, A., David Albert Newton, J., et al. (2023) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106244 · Cited by 148
Key Science Goals for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope
Johnson, M. D., Akiyama, K., Blackburn, L., Bouman, K. L., Broderick, A. E., Cardoso, V., Fender, R. P., Fromm, C. M., Galison, P. L., Gómez, J. L., et al. (2023) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies11030061 · Cited by 177
Exploring machine learning potential for climate change risk assessment
Zennaro, F., Furlan, E., Simeoni, C., Torresan, S., Aslan, S., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103752 · Cited by 153
The explainability paradox: Challenges for xAI in digital pathology
Evans, T., Retzlaff, C. O., Geißler, C., Kargl, M., Plass, M., Müller, H., Kiehl, T.-R., Zerbe, N., & Holzinger, A. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2022.03.009 · Cited by 135
Helmy, M., Smith, D. J., & Selvarajoo, K. (2020) · Metabolic Engineering Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00149 · Cited by 140
Groundwater vulnerability assessment: A review including new statistical and hybrid methods
Taghavi, N., Niven, R. K., Paull, D. J., & Kramer, M. (2022) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153486 · Cited by 132
Yang, Y., Siau, K. L., Xie, W., & Sun, Y. P. (2022) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.308814 · Cited by 142
Nguyen, V. N., Tarełko, W., Sharma, P., El-Shafay, A. S., Chen, W.-H., Nguyen, P. Q. P., Nguyen, X. P., & Hoang, A. T. (2024) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04343 · Cited by 130
Moon, S., Song, H.-J., Sharma, V. D., Lyons, K. E., Pahwa, R., Akinwuntan, A., & Devos, H. (2020) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-020-00756-5 · Cited by 137
Reviewing the Need for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI)
Gerlings, J., Shollo, A., & Constantiou, I. (2021) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.156 · Cited by 165
EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)—From Theory to Methods and Applications
Ortigossa, E. S., Gonçalves, T., & Nonato, L. G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3409843 · Cited by 124
The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making
Brożek, B., Furman, M., Jakubiec, M., & Kucharzyk, B. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-023-09356-9 · Cited by 177
Sustainability in Wood Products: A New Perspective for Handling Natural Diversity
Schubert, M., Panzarasa, G., & Burgert, I. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00360 · Cited by 127
Beyond generalization: a theory of robustness in machine learning
Freiesleben, T., & Grote, T. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04334-9 · Cited by 106
Varieties of transparency: exploring agency within AI systems
Andrada, G., Clowes, R. W., & Smart, P. R. (2022) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01326-6 · Cited by 112
Artificial intelligence in safety-critical systems: a systematic review
Wang, Y., & Chung, S. H. (2022) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-07-2021-0419 · Cited by 96
The current and future uses of machine learning in ecosystem service research
Scowen, M., Athanasiadis, I. N., Bullock, J. M., Eigenbrod, F., & Willcock, S. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149263 · Cited by 104
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., Malgieri, G., Natali, C., Schneeberger, D., Stoeger, K., & Holzinger, A. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118888 · Cited by 89
Meske, C., & Bunde, E. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50334-5_4 · Cited by 105
Enhancing trust in AI through industry self-governance.
Roski, J., Maier, E. J., Vigilante, K., Kane, E. A., & Matheny, M. E. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab065 · Cited by 83
Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Grekousis, G., Huang, Y., Hua, F., Pan, Z., & Liu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137432 · Cited by 84
Erasmus, A., Brunet, T. D. P., & Fisher, E. (2020) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00435-2 · Cited by 92
Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI
Federica Russo, B., Schliesser, E. S., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01617-6 · Cited by 109
Conceptual challenges for interpretable machine learning
Watson, D. S. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03485-5 · Cited by 87
Scientific Exploration and Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Zednik, C., & Boelsen, H. (2022) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09583-6 · Cited by 80
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence in Military Application – Opportunities and Challenges
Szabadföldi, I. (2021) · Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre · doi:10.2478/raft-2021-0022 · Cited by 72
Combining Molecular, Imaging, and Clinical Data Analysis for Predicting Cancer Prognosis
Lobato-Delgado, B., Priego, B., & Morillo, D. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14133215 · Cited by 74
Social Perception of Artificial Intelligence and Digitization of Cultural Heritage: Russian Context
Leshkevich, T., & Motozhanets, A. A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12052712 · Cited by 60
Local public services and the ethical deployment of artificial intelligence
Kinder, T., Stenvall, J., Koskimies, E., Webb, H. C., & Janenova, S. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101865 · Cited by 69
Philosophy of science at sea: Clarifying the interpretability of machine learning
Beisbart, C., & Räz, T. (2022) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12830 · Cited by 66
Creel, K., & Hellman, D. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2022.3 · Cited by 67
Understanding, Idealization, and Explainable AI
Fleisher, W. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2022.39 · Cited by 57
Black Boxes or Unflattering Mirrors? Comparative Bias in the Science of Machine Behaviour
Buckner, C. J. (2021) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/714960 · Cited by 59
Explanatory pragmatism: a context-sensitive framework for explainable medical AI
Nyrup, R., & Robinson, D. A. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09632-3 · Cited by 64
Wang, S., Liu, J.-C., Song, X., Xu, H., Gu, Y., Fan, J., Sun, B., & Yu, L. (2025) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-025-01797-y · Cited by 64
The Importance of Understanding Deep Learning
Räz, T., & Beisbart, C. (2022) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-022-00605-y · Cited by 58
Surface energy balance-based surface urban heat island decomposition at high resolution
Guo, F., Sun, J., & Hu, D. (2024) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114447 · Cited by 47
On The Philosophy of Unsupervised Learning
Watson, D. (2022) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-023-00635-6 · Cited by 46
Veritti, D., Rubinato, L., Sarao, V., Nardin, A. D., Foresti, G. L., & Lanzetta, P. (2023) · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-023-06245-4 · Cited by 46
Cascella, M., Leoni, M. L. G., Shariff, M. N., & Varrassi, G. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14090983 · Cited by 49
Revisiting the Performance-Explainability Trade-Off in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Crook, B., Schlüter, M., & Speith, T. (2023) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew57809.2023.00060 · Cited by 47
Explaining AI through mechanistic interpretability
Kästner, L., & Crook, B. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00614-4 · Cited by 59
Jeong, H., Han, S., Jung, H., Lee, W., & Jeon, K. J. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05441-y · Cited by 41
Enhancing stock market anomalies with machine learning
Azevedo, V., & Hoegner, C. (2022) · Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting · doi:10.1007/s11156-022-01099-z · Cited by 45
Liu, K., & Liao, C. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119929 · Cited by 43
Cecil, J., Lermer, E., Hudecek, M. F. C., Sauer, J., & Gaube, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60220-5 · Cited by 37
Gonçalves, A. R., Pinto, D. C., Shuqair, S., Dalmoro, M., & Mattila, A. S. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102748 · Cited by 50
Freiesleben, T., König, G., Molnar, C., & Tejero-Cantero, Á. (2024) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-024-09691-z · Cited by 66
Putting explainable AI in context: institutional explanations for medical AI
Theunissen, M., & Browning, J. (2022) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-022-09649-8 · Cited by 42
The epistemological foundations of data science: a critical analysis
Desai, J., Watson, D., Wang, V., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03933-2 · Cited by 61
When something goes wrong: Who is responsible for errors in ML decision-making?
Berber, A., & Srećković, S. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01640-1 · Cited by 44
ML interpretability: Simple isn't easy
Räz, T. (2024) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.12.007 · Cited by 35
Nguyen, V. G., Sharma, P., Ağbulut, Ü., Le, H. S., Cao, D. N., Dzida, M., Osman, S. M., Le, H. C., & Trần, V. D. (2024) · International Journal of Green Energy · doi:10.1080/15435075.2024.2326076 · Cited by 36
Oberste, L., & Heinzl, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2022.3227225 · Cited by 35
The Virtues of Interpretable Medical AI
Hatherley, J. J., Sparrow, R., & Howard, M. (2023) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180122000664 · Cited by 37
Ananda, A., Ngan, K. H., Karabağ, C., Ter-Sarkisov, A., Alonso, E., & Reyes‐Aldasoro, C. C. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21165381 · Cited by 36
Funer, F. (2022) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10076-1 · Cited by 34
Stock Market Anomalies and Machine Learning Across the Globe
Azevedo, V., Kaiser, G. S., Müller, S., & Müller, S. (2022) · Journal of Asset Management · doi:10.1057/s41260-023-00318-z · Cited by 39
Dinh, T. L., Le, T. D., Uwizeyemungu, S., & Pelletier, C. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030240 · Cited by 57
Can digital twin efforts shape microorganism-based alternative food?
Helmy, M., Elhalis, H., Rashid, M. M., & Selvarajoo, K. (2024) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2024.103115 · Cited by 32
Chen, Z., Yi, G., Li, X., Yi, B., Bao, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, Z., & Guo, Z. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-13098-5 · Cited by 33
Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard
Kuźniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., Górski, L., Winogradska, B., & Zeldenrust, R. (2022) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/2yhh9pa · Cited by 31
The trustification of AI. Disclosing the bridging pillars that tie trust and AI together
Bareis, J. (2024) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517241249430 · Cited by 32
Dear XAI Community, We Need to Talk!
Freiesleben, T., & König, G. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44064-9_3 · Cited by 36
Inductive Risk, Understanding, and Opaque Machine Learning Models
Sullivan, E. (2022) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1017/psa.2022.62 · Cited by 29
K-12 teachers’ ethical competencies for AI literacy: Insights from a systematic literature review
Tagare, D., Karki, T., & Yu, W. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105435 · Cited by 57
The Virtues of Interpretable Medical Artificial Intelligence
Hatherley, J. J., Sparrow, R., & Howard, M. (2022) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180122000305 · Cited by 32
Towards a Taxonomy for the Opacity of AI Systems
Facchini, A., & Termine, A. (2022) · Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09153-7_7 · Cited by 34
Prediction versus understanding in computationally enhanced neuroscience
Chirimuuta, M. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02713-0 · Cited by 34
Wang, Y., Liu, W., & Yao, M. Z. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231223517 · Cited by 34
Cugurullo, F. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00476-9 · Cited by 28
An emotion recognition method based on EWT-3D–CNN–BiLSTM-GRU-AT model
Çelebi, M., Öztürk, S., & Kaplan, K. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107954 · Cited by 28
Ethical Considerations in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine
Cascella, M., Shariff, M. N., Viswanath, O., Leoni, M. L. G., & Varrassi, G. (2025) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-024-01330-7 · Cited by 31
The Automated Laplacean Demon: How ML Challenges Our Views on Prediction and Explanation
Srećković, S., Berber, A., & Filipović, N. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09575-6 · Cited by 22
Using ChatGPT-generated essays in library instruction
Johnson, S., Owens, E. E., Menendez, H., & Kim, D. (2024) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102863 · Cited by 31
Empiricism in the foundations of cognition
Childers, T., Hvorecký, J., & Majer, O. (2021) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01287-w · Cited by 27
Douglas, D., Lacey, J., & Howard, D. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00549-9 · Cited by 21
The State Space of Artificial Intelligence
Lyre, H. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09538-3 · Cited by 25
Fast Hierarchical Games for Image Explanations
Teneggi, J., Luster, A., & Sulam, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3189849 · Cited by 22
Laapotti, T., & Raappana, M. (2022) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqac013 · Cited by 28
Gagliardi, G. (2023) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12870 · Cited by 25
Matsukawa, Y., Kameya, Y., Takahashi, T., Shimazu, A., Ishida, S., Yamada, M., Sassa, N., & Yamamoto, T. (2023) · International Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/iju.15233 · Cited by 20
Machine Learning Based Prediction of Nanoscale Ice Adhesion on Rough Surfaces
Ringdahl, S., Xiao, S., He, J., & Zhang, Z. (2020) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings11010033 · Cited by 19
Tell me a story: a framework for critically investigating AI language models
Munn, L., & Henrickson, L. (2024) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2024.2327024 · Cited by 24
Renftle, M., Trittenbach, H., Poznic, M., & Heil, R. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03277-x · Cited by 22
Uncertainty, Evidence, and the Integration of Machine Learning into Medical Practice
Grote, T., & Berens, P. (2023) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac034 · Cited by 18
Elghazouly, H. G. Z., El-naggar, A. M., Ayaad, S., & Nassar, E. T. (2023) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2023.11.059 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Zednik, C.
- Affiliations
- Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zednik, Carlos
- ORCID
- Zednik, Carlos
- Venue
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2019-12-20
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-288
- ISSN
- 2210-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5441
- OpenAlex
- W2955132579
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 87 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Philosophy & Technology (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- explainable AI, black box problem, opacity, normative framework, philosophy of science, feature visualization, diagnostic classification, machine learning transparency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review