The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Information Change Attitudes Toward Immigrants?
Open accessAbstract
Strategies aimed at reducing negative attitudes toward immigrants are at the core of integration policies. A large literature shows that misperceptions about the size and characteristics of immigrants are common. A few studies implemented interventions to correct innumeracy regarding the size of the immigrant population, but they did not detect any effects on attitudes. We study whether providing information not only about the size but also about the characteristics of the immigrant population can have stronger effects. We conduct two online experiments with samples from the United States, providing one-half of the participants with five statistics about immigration. This information bundle improves people’s attitudes toward current legal immigrants. Most effects are driven by Republicans and other groups with more negative initial attitudes toward immigrants. In our second experiment, we show that treatment effects persist one month later. Finally, we analyze a large cross-country survey experiment to provide external validity to the finding that information about the size of the foreign-born population is not enough to change policy views. We conclude that people with negative views on immigration before the intervention can become more supportive of immigration if their misperceptions about the characteristics of the foreign-born population are corrected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A study that compared different information treatments found that Republicans raised their support for legal immigration only when they were informed about characteristics of the immigrant population and not only about its size (Grigorieff et al., 2020).”
From Factual belief polarization between Democrats and Republicans: source or epiphenomenon of ideological and affective polarization? (2024) · cites this paper as Grigorieff et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2695870 · Cited by 4,464
Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x · Cited by 4,344
Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position
Blumer, H. (1958) · The Pacific Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/1388607 · Cited by 3,487
When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2 · Cited by 3,173
Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations
Davies, I., & Blalock, H. M. (1967) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/588680 · Cited by 2,958
Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects
Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00733.x · Cited by 2,719
Anderson, M. L. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214508000000841 · Cited by 2,410 · cited 4×
“17For each family of outcomes, we control for a false discovery rate of 5 percent (Anderson 2008).”
InfluentialQuillian, L. (1995) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096296 · Cited by 2,322
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z · Cited by 1,739
Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510489113 · Cited by 1,586
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Alesina A. , MianoA., & StantchevaS. (2018). Immigration and redistribution (NBER Working Paper No. 24733). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w24733.pdf
- Haaland I. , & RothC. (2018). Labor market concerns and support for immigration (Working paper). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3017420
- Sides J. , & CitrinJ. (2007, April). How large the huddled masses? The causes and consequences of public misperceptions about immigrant populations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1ee/53927e699c37f80aaf3b54d8efc86b69ad32.pdf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Designing Information Provision Experiments
Haaland, I., Roth, C., & Wohlfart, J. (2023) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20211658 · Cited by 577
Self-citationImmigration and Redistribution
Alesina, A., Miano, A., & Stantcheva, S. (2022) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdac011 · Cited by 375
Reshaping Adolescents' Gender Attitudes: Evidence from a School-Based Experiment in India
Dhar, D., Jain, T., & Jayachandran, S. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20201112 · Cited by 297
Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees
Adida, C. L., Lo, A., & Izama, M. P. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804002115 · Cited by 250
Immigration and Redistribution
Alesina, A., Miano, A., & Stantcheva, S. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24733 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Grigorieff, A., Roth, C., & Ubfal, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grigorieff, Alexis
- Roth, Christopher
- Ubfal, Diego
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1117-1143
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W3036844501
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 39.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Demography (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- European Commission (608109)
- Università Bocconi
- Uppsala Universitet
- Economic and Social Research Council ([SSD/2/2/16])
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
- Keywords
- attitudes toward immigrants, immigration policy, information interventions, migrant characteristics, immigrant population size, partisanship, Republican voters, treatment persistence, public opinion change, integration policy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude, Emigration and Immigration, Female, Humans, Male, Politics, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Knowledge, Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
