Cited by 15Skin Protection and Agingmelanin and skin pigmentationPhotopolymerization techniques and applications

New combination of ultraviolet absorbers in an oily emollient increases sunscreen efficacy and photostability

Open access
L’Alloret, Florence, Candau, Didier, Seité, Sophie, Pygmalion, Marie-Jocelyne, Ruiz, Laetitia, Josso, Martin, Meaudre, Hélène, Gauchet, Lydie +2 more·2012·Dermatology and Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is now recognized that to adequately protect skin from sun damage, sunscreens require a photostable combination of ultraviolet (UV) filters with a suitable level of UVA protection. The total amount of UV filters should be as low as possible to avoid adverse skin reactions, potential environmental impact, and to ensure acceptable texture for better application and usage. METHODS: A synergistic combination of UV filters was selected to obtain a high sun protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection factor (UVA-PF). An oily vehicle was then added to the formula to improve the solubility and the photostability of the lipophilic UV filters. RESULTS: The combination of filters, i.e., terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid (TDSA), bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazin (BEMT), and butyl methoxy dibenzoyl methane (BMDM), obtained an elevated SPF as well as a high UVA-PF. Isopropyl lauroyl sarcosinate (ILS), a derivative of a natural amino acid (sarcosine, also known as N-methylglycine) was introduced in this formulation in order to dissolve the oil-soluble UV absorbers and to photostabilize BMDM. The new sunscreen formulation obtained with this combination is photostable and contains a reduced amount of UV filters compared to other sunscreens with the same level of efficacy. CONCLUSION: This report described the steps resulting in the formulation of a new combination of UV filters in an oily emollient, which presents a high UVA-PF (UVA-PF = 38) and a SPF 50+, is photostable, and offers good protection against UV-induced biological damage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13555-012-0004-8

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vegetable oils, guava-fruit extract, rice bran and raspberry seeds, and red propolis extracts can increase the SPF of sunscreens.

    “It was also possible to enhance the efficiency of UV filters by increasing the SPF of the sunscreens, using vegetable oils [111,112], guava-fruit extract [113,114], rice bran and raspberry seeds [115], and red propolis extracts [116].”

    From UV Filters: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [111]

    The Results section ('SPF and UPA-PF of Sunscreens I and J'; page not provided) reports increased SPF in a formulation containing an oily vehicle. But the paper identifies that vehicle as isopropyl lauroyl sarcosinate, a derivative of an amino acid, not a vegetable oil. It therefore supports SPF enhancement, but not the vegetable-oil example attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Commission of the European Communities. Commission recommendation of 22 September 2006 on the efficacy of sunscreen products and the claims made relating thereto. Official Journal of the European Union 2006/647/EC, L265/39–L265/43 (2006) Document number 32006H0647. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:265:0039:0043:EN:PDF. Accessed Mar 19 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
L’Alloret, F., Candau, D., Seité, S., Pygmalion, M.-J., Ruiz, L., Josso, M., Meaudre, H., Gauchet, L., Pena, A.-M., & Colonna, A.
Affiliations
  • L'Oréal (France) (FR)
  • Roche (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Seité, Sophie
Venue
Dermatology and Therapy
Published
2012-04-17
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
4-4
ISSN
  • 2190-9172 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-8210
OpenAlex
W1992972492
Cited by
15
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Dermatology and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
L'Oreal USA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Photopolymerization techniques and applications
Keywords
sunscreen formulation, UV filters, photostability, UVA protection factor, sun protection factor, UVA-induced skin damage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review