Cited by 248Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesSkin Protection and AgingDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens: Review of a 15‐year experience and of the literature

Schauder, Silvia, Ippen, Hellmut·1997·Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

This review summarizes published and unpublished data of our 15‐year experience with sunscreen allergy and photoallergy. From 1981–1996. 402 patients with suspected clinical photosensitivity were patch and photopatch tested with the commercial sunscreens and facial cosmetics (hat they had used and with chemical UV absorbers, fragrance materials, preservatives, and emollients. Mi patients (20%) (28 men, 52 women) demonstrated allergic and/or photoallergic contact dermatitis to 1 or more UV absorber(s). In 47 patients with photodermatoses or photo‐aggravated dermatoses and in 33 subjects with normal photosensitivity, 91 allergic and 84 photoallergic reactions to UV filters were observed. Over the years sunscreens were added lo the test series, which since 1989 comprised the following 10 UV absorbers and which induced allergic (a) and photoallergic (pa) reactions (number, type of reaction); 4 UVA absorbers – isopropyldibenzoylmethane (30a/32pa); butyl methoxydibenzoyl‐methane (15a/13pa); henzophenone‐3 (3a/9pa): benzophenone‐4 (0a/0pa); and 6 UVB absorbers – PABA (2a/2pa); octyl dimethyl PABA (1a/2pa); methylbenzylidene camphor (32a/5pa); octyl methoxycinnamate (3a/4pa); isoamyl p‐methoxycinnamate (4a/10pa); and phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid (1a/7pa). The frequent (photo)sensitization to isopropyldibenzoylmethane was the reason that its production was discontinued in 1993. 47 patients reacted to fragrance materials, 11 to preservatives and 2 to lanolin alcohol. These constituents were contained in the commercial sunscreens and cosmetics that they had used. Continuous revision of the UV absorber photopatch test series was necessary to be closer to the real frequency of exposure and of reported I photo (allergy to newer sunscreens. Clinicians should consider contact and photocontact allergy, especially in patients with photodermatoses and photo‐aggravated dermatoses and they should perform photopatch testing. Once the culprit has been identified, its INCI (International Nomenclature Cosmetic Ingredients) designation should be given to the patient, who must be warned to avoid products containing the (photo)allergen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02439.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxybenzone has been regarded as the most allergic agent and has been implicated in many contact and photoallergic dermatitis cases.

    “First, this active has been regarded as the most allergic agent and has been implicated for many contact and photoallergic dermatitis (82,83).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schauder, S., & Ippen, H.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Schauder, Silvia
Venue
Contact Dermatitis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-11
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
221-232
ISSN
  • 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0536
OpenAlex
W2122147892
Cited by
248
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
sunscreen allergy, photoallergic contact dermatitis, UV absorbers, photopatch testing, benzophenone-3, benzophenone-4, p-aminobenzoic acid, octyl methoxycinnamate, fragrance allergy, preservative allergy, photodermatosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Europe, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sunscreening Agents, United States, Incidence, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Dermatitis, Photoallergic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review