The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions
Open accessAbstract
Conservation agriculture involves reduced tillage, permanent soil cover and crop rotations to enhance soil fertility and to supply food from a dwindling land resource. Recently, conservation agriculture has been promoted in Southern Africa, mainly for maize-based farming systems. However, maize yields under rain-fed conditions are often variable. There is therefore a need to identify factors that influence crop yield under conservation agriculture and rain-fed conditions. Here, we studied maize grain yield data from experiments lasting 5 years and more under rain-fed conditions. We assessed the effect of long-term tillage and residue retention on maize grain yield under contrasting soil textures, nitrogen input and climate. Yield variability was measured by stability analysis. Our results show an increase in maize yield over time with conservation agriculture practices that include rotation and high input use in low rainfall areas. But we observed no difference in system stability under those conditions. We observed a strong relationship between maize grain yield and annual rainfall. Our meta-analysis gave the following findings: (1) 92% of the data show that mulch cover in high rainfall areas leads to lower yields due to waterlogging; (2) 85% of data show that soil texture is important in the temporal development of conservation agriculture effects, improved yields are likely on well-drained soils; (3) 73% of the data show that conservation agriculture practices require high inputs especially N for improved yield; (4) 63% of data show that increased yields are obtained with rotation but calculations often do not include the variations in rainfall within and between seasons; (5) 56% of the data show that reduced tillage with no mulch cover leads to lower yields in semi-arid areas; and (6) when adequate fertiliser is available, rainfall is the most important determinant of yield in southern Africa. It is clear from our results that conservation agriculture needs to be targeted and adapted to specific biophysical conditions for improved impact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties1
Eberhart, S. A., & Russell, W. A. (1966) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183x000600010011x · Cited by 3,680
Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Phillips, A. N. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533 · Cited by 2,415
Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research
Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,839
Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa : the heretics ’ view
Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.06.017 · Cited by 1,499
Self-citationThe Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence
Dickersin, K. (1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100097014 · Cited by 1,417
Stewart, B. A. (1986) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-198604000-00011 · Cited by 1,085
Replenishing Soil Fertility in Africa
(1997) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub51 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture
Pittelkow, C. M., Liang, X., Linquist, B. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Lee, J., Lundy, M. E., van Gestel, N., Six, J., Venterea, R. T., & van Kessel, C. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13809 · Cited by 1,688
Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops
Daryanto, S., Fu, B., Wang, L., Jacinthe, P.-A., & Zhao, W. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.013 · Cited by 408
Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems – A review
Rosa-Schleich, J., Loos, J., Mußhoff, O., & Tscharntke, T. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.002 · Cited by 397
Conservation agriculture as a sustainable system for soil health: a review
Cárceles Rodríguez, B., Durán-Zuazo, V. H., Soriano Rodríguez, M., García-Tejero, I. F., Gálvez Ruiz, B., & Cuadros Tavira, S. (2022) · Soil Systems · doi:10.3390/soilsystems6040087 · Cited by 337
Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia
Jat, M. L., Chakraborty, D., Ladha, J. K., Rana, D. S., Gathala, M. K., McDonald, A., & Gerard, B. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0500-2 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., van Wijk, M. T., Rufino, M. C., Nyamangara, J., & Giller, K. E.
- Venue
- Agronomy for Sustainable Development
- Published
- 2011-07-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 657-673
- ISSN
- 1773-0155 (ISSN-L)
- 1774-0746
- OpenAlex
- W2124080601
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2
- The paper
- Rusinamhodzi, L., Corbeels, M., van Wijk, M. T., Rufino, M. C., Nyamangara, J., & Giller, K. E. (2011). A meta-analysis of long-term effects of conservation agriculture on maize grain yield under rain-fed conditions. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0040-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.