Cited by 372Obesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health PracticesHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomics of obesity.

Open access

Abstract

Purpose of review The purpose of this review is to evaluate and emphasize important findings in the recent literature regarding the socioeconomics of obesity. It is important to evaluate trends of this global epidemic and elucidate its impact on different demographic groups and across socioeconomic strata. Recent findings Obesity rates continue to increase domestically and globally which is associated with a concomitant rise in medical and economic costs. There are disparities in obesity rates based on race/ethnicity, sex, gender and sexual identity, and socioeconomic status, yet these disparities are not explained fully by health behaviors, socioeconomic position, or cumulative stress alone-community and societal environmental factors have a significant role in the obesity epidemic. Socioeconomic factors contribute to obesity on an individual and community level, and any viable approach to sustainably addressing the obesity epidemic must take these factors into account.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13679-020-00398-7

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C, Westfall AO, Allison DB. Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA. 2003;289(2):187–93. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 371

Metadata

Authors
Anekwe, C. V., Jarrell, A. R., Townsend, M. J., Gaudier, G. I., Hiserodt, J. M., & Stanford, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Anekwe, Chika Vera
Venue
Current Obesity Reports
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
272-279
ISSN
2162-4968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040190199
Cited by
372
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Obesity Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (L30 DK118710, P30DK040561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
obesity, socioeconomic status, health disparities, obesity epidemic, race and ethnicity, sex differences, gender identity, sexual identity, cumulative stress, health care costs, economic burden of obesity
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Risk Factors, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behavior, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review