Cited by 312Business Process Modeling and AnalysisScientific Computing and Data ManagementSemantic Web and Ontologies

Knowledge-Intensive Processes: Characteristics, Requirements and Analysis of Contemporary Approaches

Open access
Di Ciccio, Claudio, Marrella, Andrea, Russo, Alessandro·2015·Journal on Data Semantics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13740-014-0038-4

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BPM systems' largely static nature is a major limitation, as they struggle to accommodate the data-driven branching that characterizes dynamic workflows.

    “However, their largely static nature proves to be a major limitation, as these frameworks struggle to accommodate the data-driven branching that characterizes dynamic workflows (Di Ciccio, Marrella, and Russo 2015).”

    From VADAOrchestra: Neurosymbolic Orchestration of Adaptive Reasoning Workflows (2026) · cites this paper as Di Ciccio, Marrella, and Russo 2015

    The Introduction and Discussion describe conventional BPM approaches as relying on prescribed execution flows and identify serious limitations in supporting evolving, knowledge-intensive processes. However, §6.1 says YAWL can evaluate branching conditions using variables defined at configuration time. The paper supports difficulty with runtime flexibility and data access, but not an unqualified inability to accommodate data-driven branching. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Traditional Business Process Management systems provide rigor, determinism, and auditability, yet they generally struggle to adapt their execution at runtime.

    “Traditional Business Process Management systems provide rigor, determinism, and auditability, yet they generally struggle to adapt their execution at runtime.”

    From VADAOrchestra: Neurosymbolic Orchestration of Adaptive Reasoning Workflows (2026) · cites this paper as Di Ciccio, Marrella, and Russo 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Meyer A, Smirnov S, Weske M (2011) Data in Busi- ness Processes. EMISA Forum 31(3):5-31
  2. Warren P, Kings N, Thurlow I, Davies J, Buerger T, Simperl E, Ruiz C, Gomez-Perez JM, Ermolayev V, Ghani R, Tilly M, Bösser T, Imtiaz A (2009) Im- proving Knowledge Worker Productivity -the Ac- tive Integrated Approach. BT Tech Journal 26(2)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., & Russo, A.
Affiliations
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Marrella, Andrea
Venue
Journal on Data Semantics
Published
2014-04-09
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
29-57
ISSN
  • 1861-2032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1861-2040
OpenAlex
W1992412373
Cited by
312
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 3
FWCI
55.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal on Data Semantics (publishedVersion)
  • WU Research (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (318275)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
knowledge-intensive processes, process engineering, process management, process execution, requirements analysis, evaluation framework, process approach, data-centric systems, flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review