Cited by 21Infectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Multiplex real-time PCR FilmArray performance in the diagnosis of meningoencephalitis: lights and shadows

Open access
López, Néstor, Cuesta, Genoveva, Rodríguez-Vega, Sara, Rosas, Enric, Chumbita, Mariana, Casals-Pascual, Climent, Morata, Laura, Vergara, Andrea +10 more·2024·Infection

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the performance of the FilmArray (FA) meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel. Secondarily, we analyzed the false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) results, as well as the predictive values of the technique, regarding the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics. METHODS: FA is a multiplex real-time PCR detecting 14 of the most common ME pathogens in CSF. All FA performed at our hospital (2018-2022) were retrospectively reviewed. FA was compared to conventional techniques and its performance was assessed based on the final diagnosis of the episode. RESULTS: FA was performed in 313 patients with suspicion of ME. Most patients had altered mental status (65.2%) and fever (61%). Regarding CSF characteristics, 49.8% and 53.7% presented high CSF proteins and pleocytosis, respectively. There were 84 (26.8%) positive FA results, mainly for HSV-1 (10.9%), VZV (5.1%), Enterovirus (2.6%), and S. pneumoniae (1.9%). In the 136 cases where both FA and routine methods were performed, there was a 25.7% lack of agreement. We identified 6.6% FN results, but 28.6% FP, mainly due to HSV-1. This resulted in a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 93.4%, but a positive predictive value (PPV) of 73%. Remarkably, PPV as low as 36.9%, and 70.2%, were found in cases without pleocytosis, or lack of high CSF protein levels, respectively. CONCLUSION: FA was associated with high NPV, but frequent FP results and low PPV, particularly for HSV-1, and especially in patients without high CSF protein levels or pleocytosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s15010-023-02076-x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Published positivity rates for CSF multiplex PCR range from 18.8% to 32.8%.

    “Published positivity rates for CSF multiplex PCR range from 18.8% to 32.8%10, 11, 12, aligning with our positivity rate of 24.3%.”

    From Clinical Impact of Cerebrospinal Fluid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Testing in Children with Suspected Central Nervous System Infection (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results (Table 3; page unavailable) report a 26.8% positive FilmArray rate, which falls within the claimed range. But the Discussion (page unavailable) describes prior studies’ positivity rates as 8–25%, not 18.8–32.8%; this source does not support the stated endpoints. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
López, N., Cuesta, G., Rodríguez-Vega, S., Rosas, E., Chumbita, M., Casals-Pascual, C., Morata, L., Vergara, A., Bodro, M., Bosch, J., Herrera, S., Martínez, J. A., Mensa, J., Garcia-Vidal, C., Marcos, M. Á., Vila, J., Soriano, A., & Puerta-Alcalde, P.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital Universitario De Cabueñes (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES)
Venue
Infection
Published
2023-07-29
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
165-172
ISSN
  • 0300-8126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0973
OpenAlex
W4385380208
Cited by
21
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infection (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (JR20/00012, PI21/00498, ICI21/00103)
  • Universitat de Barcelona
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel, meningitis, encephalitis, cerebrospinal fluid, multiplex real-time PCR, diagnostic accuracy, false positives, herpes simplex virus type 1, false-negative results, pleocytosis, cerebrospinal fluid protein, predictive value, viral meningitis
MeSH terms
Encephalitis, Humans, Leukocytosis, Meningitis, Meningoencephalitis, Retrospective Studies, Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review