Cited by 60Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Behavioral therapy approaches for the management of low back pain: an up-to-date systematic review

Open access
Vitoula, Kristallia, Venneri, Annalena, Varrassi, Giustino, Paladini, Antonella, Sykioti, Panagiota, Adewusi, Joy, Zis, Panagiotis·2018·Pain and Therapy

Abstract

Low back pain is one of the most common causes for seeking medical treatment and it is estimated that one in two people will experience low back pain at some point during their lifetimes. Management of low back pain includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Non-pharmaceutical treatments include interventions such as acupuncture, spinal manipulation, and psychotherapy. The latter is especially important as patients who suffer from low back pain often have impaired quality of life and also suffer from depression. Depressive symptoms can appear because back pain limits patients' ability to work and engage in their usual social activities. The aim of this systematic review was to overview the behavioral approaches that can be used in the management of patients with low back pain. Approaches such as electromyography (EMG) biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction are discussed as non-pharmacological options in the management of low back pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40122-018-0099-4

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large proportion of the reviews (N=15) reported the distress-related outcomes of interventions employing a variety of psychological strategies including acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), behavioural therapy, goal setting and self-management strategies.

    “A large proportion of the reviews (N=15) reported the distress-related outcomes of interventions employing a variety of psychological strategies including acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), behavioural therapy, goal setting and self-management strategies.3444 50 62 6472 75 82”

    From Impact of healthcare interventions on distress following acute musculoskeletal/orthopaedic injury: A scoping review of systematic reviews (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results sections on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Third Wave Approaches discuss CBT, ACT, and distress-related concerns such as depression, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing in low back pain. But the review says studies of ACT in low back pain are lacking, so it does not report ACT distress outcomes; the passages also do not establish goal-setting or self-management outcomes. The count of 15 reviews is the citing authors’ aggregate, not a count this individual review can establish. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [57]Walsh DA Radcliffe JC Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain Pain 2002 97 1–2 23 31 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00426-2 12031776 · DOI
  2. [66]Linton SJ A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25 9 1148 1156 10.1097/00007632-200005010-00017 10788861 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vitoula, K., Venneri, A., Varrassi, G., Paladini, A., Sykioti, P., Adewusi, J., & Zis, P.
Affiliations
  • KAT General Hospital of Attica (GR)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of L'Aquila (IT)
  • Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Zis, Panagiotis
Venue
Pain and Therapy
Published
2018-05-16
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 2193-651X (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-8237
OpenAlex
W2804254863
Cited by
60
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi dell Aquila (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Ryder Briggs Neuroscience Research Fund
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
low back pain, behavior therapy, non-pharmacological treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, EMG biofeedback, depression, quality of life, psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review