Cited by 350Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments for Chronic Pain: What Works for Whom?

Vlaeyen, Johan W. S., Morley, Stephen·2005·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Since the introduction of behavioral medicine in the early 70s, cognitive-behavioral treatment interventions for chronic pain have expanded considerably. It is now well established that these interventions are effective in reducing the enormous suffering that patients with chronic pain have to bear. In addition, these interventions have potential economic benefits in that they appear to be cost-effective as well. Despite these achievements, there is still room for improvement. First, there is a substantial proportion of patients who do not appear to benefit from treatment interventions available. Second, although the effect sizes of most cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain are comparable to those in psychopathology, they are quite modest. Third, there is little evidence for differential outcomes for different treatment methods. Fourth, there still is relatively little known about the specific biobehavioral mechanisms that lead to chronic pain and pain disability. One direction is to better match treatment programs to patients' characteristics. This can be done according to an "Aptitude X Treatment Interaction" framework, or from the perspective of the Moderator-Mediator distinction. In this introduction to the special series on what works for whom in cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain, we review existing knowledge concerning both moderating and mediating variables in cognitive-behavioral treatments for chronic pain. We further argue in favor of theory-driven research as the only way to define specific a priori hypotheses about which patient-treatment interactions to expect. We also argue that replicated single-participant studies, with appropriate statistics, are likely to enhance new developments in this clinical research area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200501000-00001

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Flor, 1993, J Consult Clin Psychol, 61, 653, 10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.653 · DOI
  2. Rainville, 1997, J Rehabil Res Dev, 34, 383
  3. Faas, 1996, Huisarts Wet, 39, 18
  4. Linton, 1998, editorial Pain, 75, 163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Morley, S.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2005-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119092864
Cited by
350
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic pain, pain-related disability, treatment moderators, patient-treatment matching, theory-driven research, cost-effectiveness, treatment response variability
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Clinical Competence, Humans, Pain, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Risk Assessment, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review