Cited by 10Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Feasibility and acceptability of a prevention program for eating disorders (Me, You and Us) adapted for young adolescents in Korea

Lee, Gi Young, Park, Eun Jin, Kim, Youl-Ri, Kwag, Kyung Hwa, Park, Jin Hong, An, So Hyun, Lee, Ji Hyun, Sim, Jeong Hun +1 more·2018·Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the adaptability and acceptability of a prevention program.Methods A total of 169 Korean students (83 boys and 86 girls) with a mean age of 12.3 years from a 6th grade class at an elementary school participated in the study. Mental health social workers delivered Me, You and Us, a school-based body image intervention program originally developed in the UK, through a set of six sessions. The participants were assessed in terms of their body satisfaction and self-esteem before the program, after the program, and at 1-month follow-up. They were also surveyed about their satisfaction and acceptability levels after the program.Results At baseline, girls had lower body satisfaction and self-esteem than boys, and their body satisfaction and self-esteem improved after the program. The improved body satisfaction was maintained at the 1-month follow-up. The efficacy of the program on body satisfaction was positively correlated with the frequency of their baseline level of "fat talk." The program was more effective in girls with possible symptoms of an eating disorder at baseline. 93.7% of boys and 77.4% of girls responded that they enjoyed the program.Conclusions The program Me, You and Us was well-accepted by early adolescents in Korea and it can play a role in increasing body satisfaction and self-esteem by reducing "fat talk" in 6th grade students.Level of evidence Level III, cohort study with intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40519-017-0436-3

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, G. Y., Park, E. J., Kim, Y.-R., Kwag, K. H., Park, J. H., An, S. H., Lee, J. H., Sim, J. H., & Treasure, J.
Affiliations
  • Inje University (KR)
  • Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital (KR)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kim, Youl-Ri
Venue
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2017-09-04
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
673-683
ISSN
  • 1124-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-1262
OpenAlex
W2752701980
Cited by
10
References
58
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2014S1A5B8063466)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
eating disorder prevention, body image, body satisfaction, self-esteem, fat talk, early adolescents, school-based intervention, program acceptability, program adaptation, gender differences, Korean students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Child, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, School Health Services, Schools, Self Concept, Students, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review