Cited by 250Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

What works in secondary schools? A systematic review of classroom-based body image programs

Open access
Yager, Zali, Diedrichs, Phillippa C., Ricciardelli, Lina A., Halliwell, Emma·2013·Body Image

Abstract

Governments, schools, and curriculum authorities are increasingly recognizing that body image during adolescence is a public health issue that warrants attention in the school setting. After 30 years of eating disorder prevention research, and given the current interest in this area, it seems timely to review the research on interventions to improve body image in schools. We reviewed universal-selective, classroom-based programs that have been conducted since the year 2000, among adolescents, and found 16 eligible intervention programs. Seven of these programs were effective in improving body image on at least one measure, from pre to post test, though effect sizes were small (d=0.22-0.48). These effective programs were conducted among younger adolescents 12.33-13.62 years, and included activities focusing on media literacy, self esteem, and the influence of peers. Implications for school personnel and curriculum authorities are discussed, and we provide recommendations for a strategic approach to future research in this area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.04.001

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Huon, G. F., Braganza, C., Brown, L., Ritchie, J., & Roncolato, W. (1998). Reflections on prevention in dieting-induced disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23, 455-458.
  2. NEDC. (2010). Eating Disorder Prevention, treatment, and management: An evidence review. Available URL: http://nedc.com.au/nedc-publications
  3. O'Dea, J., Abraham, S., & Heard, R. (1996). Food habits, body image and weight control practices of young male and female adolescents. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 52, 32-38.
  4. Paxton, S. (2002). Research review of body image programs: An overview of body image dissatisfaction prevention interventions. Melbourne: Victorian Department Givernment Department of Human Services.
  5. Phelps, L., Sapia, J. L., Nathanson, D., & Nelson, L. (2000). An empirically supported eating disorder prevention program. Psychology in Schools, 37(5), 443-452.
  6. Rosenvinge, J., & Borreson, R. (1999). Preventing eating disorders-Time to change current programs or paradigms? Current update and further recommendations. European Eating Disorders Review, 7, 5-16.
  7. Smolak, L., Levine, M., & Thompson, J. K. (2001). The use of sociocultural atitudes towards appearance questionnaie with middle school boys and girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 216-223.
  8. Stunkard, A., & Messick, S. (1985). The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint. Journal of Psychosomatic research, 29, 71-83.
  9. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L., & Tantleff, S. (1991). The Physical Appearance Comparison Scale [PACS]. . Behavior Assesment Review, 14, 174.
  10. Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., & Defares, P. B. (1986). Dutch eating behaviour questionnaire for assessment of restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 295-315.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yager, Z., Diedrichs, P. C., Ricciardelli, L. A., & Halliwell, E.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of England (GB)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Yager, Zali
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
271-281
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059466851
Cited by
250
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
adolescents, eating disorder prevention, school-based intervention, media literacy, self-esteem, peer influence, secondary schools, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Child, Health Education, Humans, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review