Cited by 1,416Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The SCOFF questionnaire: Assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders

Open access
Morgan, J. F, Reid, F., Lacey, J H.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

Eating disorders are among the most common psychiatric disorders in young women. Early detection and treatment improves prognosis, but presentation is often cryptic—for example, via physical symptoms in primary care. Ability to diagnose the condition varies and can be inadequate,1 and existing questionnaires for detection 2 3 are lengthy and may require specialist interpretation. No simple, memorable screening instruments are available for non-specialists. In alcohol misuse the CAGE questionnaire4 has proved popular with clinicians because of its simplicity. We developed and tested a similar tool for eating disorders— with questions designed to raise suspicion that an eating disorder might exist—before rigorous clinical assessment. We developed five questions addressing core features of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa using focus groups of patients with eating disorders and specialists in eating disorders; we tested the questions in a feasibility study of patients and staff at an eating disorders unit None …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The YSR, SCOFF, and KIDSCREEN are validated and often used instruments.

    “we obtained data from three validated and often used instruments to assess psychopathological symptoms and quality of life.”

    From Psychopathological symptoms and well-being in overweight and underweight adolescents: A network analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Participants, methods, and results section describes the development and testing of SCOFF, and the Comment section says there is sufficient evidence of validity for routine use in patients considered at risk of eating disorders. The paper presents SCOFF as a new screening tool, so it does not establish that it was often used; it also does not assess YSR or KIDSCREEN. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to the authors of the original SCOFF version, a score ≥ 2 represents an increased risk for eating disorders.

    “According to the authors of the original SCOFF version [39], a score ≥ 2 represents an increased risk for eating disorders.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, J. F., Reid, F., & Lacey, J. H.
Affiliations
  • St George's Hospital (GB)
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Morgan, J. F
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-12-04
Volume
319
Issue
7223
Pages
1467-1468
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1978750038
Cited by
1,416
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 107 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 34
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
SCOFF questionnaire, eating disorders, screening tool, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, early detection, questionnaire development, focus groups, primary care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review