The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic Bias in Education
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we review algorithmic bias in education, discussing the causes of that bias and reviewing the empirical literature on the specific ways that algorithmic bias is known to have manifested in education. While other recent work has reviewed mathematical definitions of fairness and expanded algorithmic approaches to reducing bias, our review focuses instead on solidifying the current understanding of the concrete impacts of algorithmic bias in education—which groups are known to be impacted and which stages and agents in the development and deployment of educational algorithms are implicated. We discuss theoretical and formal perspectives on algorithmic bias, connect those perspectives to the machine learning pipeline, and review metrics for assessing bias. Next, we review the evidence around algorithmic bias in education, beginning with the most heavily-studied categories of race/ethnicity, gender, and nationality, and moving to the available evidence of bias for less-studied categories, such as socioeconomic status, disability, and military-connected status. Acknowledging the gaps in what has been studied, we propose a framework for moving from unknown bias to known bias and from fairness to equity. We discuss obstacles to addressing these challenges and propose four areas of effort for mitigating and resolving the problems of algorithmic bias in AIED systems and other educational technology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical studies show that AI systems may replicate social and cultural inequalities embedded in training data, influencing assessment outcomes and learning opportunities (Baker & Hawn, 2022;Barbierato et al., 2022;Deho et al., 2023;Jiang & Pardos, 2021).”
From Academic Integrity and Students’ Ethical Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Similarly, ChatGPT's apparent fluency can encourage students to skip ethical consideration or critical examination, particularly when its biases remain hidden (Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Their review shows that algorithmic harms are often amplified in educational systems that rely heavily on predictive modelling for assessments, admissions, or instructional personalisation.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Baker and Hawn (2022) caution that automation may subtly displace critical judgment, especially in repetitive tasks or environments with ambiguous accountability structures.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Students consistently identified the limitations of GenAI tools, whether factual errors in ChatGPT's market data or Eurocentric imagery generated by DALL•E, and responded by applying evaluative strategies (Rana, 2024;Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“When not accompanied by ethical framing, structured experimentation, and critical reflection, GenAI tools may encourage automation bias, epistemic shallowness, and dependency (Zhai et al., 2024;Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“shows that bias can enter at multiple stages of the machine-learning pipeline and affect groups defined not only by race, gender, or nationality but also by socioeconomic status and disability (Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Responsible AI in Polish Higher-Education Administration under the EU AI Act: High-Risk Use Cases, Fundamental-Rights Impact Assessment, and Institutional Accountability (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Researchers have also highlighted the lack of perspective of people with disabilities in AI fairness (Baker & Hawn, 2021;Trewin, 2018).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
In the citing paper
“Research on the use of AI in education and disability is still scarce (Baker & Hawn, 2021)”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
In the citing paper
“The opinions and experiences of students with disabilities are essential because they are often overlooked (Baker & Hawn, 2021;Sullivan et al., 2023).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
In the citing paper
“Educational uses of generative AI pose several other challenges. One is the perpetuation of biases and discrimination, potentially reinforcing racial or gender-based stereotypes during personalized learning, automated scoring, and admission processes (88, 90).”
From The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making (2024) · cites this paper as [90]
In the citing paper
“However, the proliferation of AI in education also raises pertinent ethical concerns, including data privacy, algorithmic biases, and the digital divide (Baker & Hawn, 2021;Ifenthaler, 2023).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners (2024) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · Cited by 10,551
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Smith, L. T. (2024) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,767
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · cited 1×
“…2019; Telford, 2019); racial bias in sentencing decisions (Angwin et al., 2016), racial bias in identifying patients for additional health care (Obermeyer et al., 2019), and -- in education -- bias in standardized testing and its resulting impact on high stakes admission decisions (Dorans,…”
BackgroundA Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild
Soomro, K., Zamir, A. R., & Shah, M. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.0402 · Cited by 4,575
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09010 · Cited by 2,474
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3458723 · Cited by 2,469
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bird, S., Dale, R., Dorr, B. J., Gibson, B., Joseph, M. T., Kan, M. Y., Lee, D., Powley, B., Radev, D. R., & Tan, Y. F. (2008). No Title. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1755–1759.
- Cramer, H., Holstein, K., Vaughan, J. W., Daumé, H., Dudik, M., Wallach, H., Reddy, S., & Jean, G.-G. [The Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*)]. (2019). FAT* 2019 translation tutorial: Challenges of incorporating algorithmic fairness [video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/UicKZv93SOY
- Crawford, K. [The Artificial Intelligence Channel]. (2017). The Trouble with Bias - NIPS 2017 Keynote - Kate Crawford [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/fMym_BKWQzk
- Holstein, K. & Doroudi, S. (in press). Equity and artificial intelligence in education: Will “AIEd” Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education? Invited chapter in Porayska-Pomsta, K. & Holmes, W. (Eds.), Ethics in AIED: Who Cares? Data, algorithms, equity and biases in educational contexts. Routledge Press.
- Howley, I. (2018) If an algorithm is openly accessible, and no one can understand it, is it actually open? In Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshop on Ethics in AIED 2018.
- Li, X., Song, D., Han, M., Zhang, Y., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2021). On the limits of algorithmic prediction across the globe. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15212. · arXiv
- Soundarajan, S., & Clausen, D. L. (2018). Equal Protection Under the Algorithm: A Legal-Inspired Framework for Identifying Discrimination in Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 994
Pack, A., Hartshorn, K. J., Escalante, J., & Gillette, N. (2025) · International Journal of English for Academic Purposes: Research and Practice · doi:10.3828/ijeap.2025.2 · Cited by 3
Hershkovitz, A., & Alexandron, G. (2024) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.58459/rptel.2025.20020 · Cited by 3
The Role of AI Language Assistants in Dialogic Education for Collective Intelligence
Casebourne, I., & Wegerif, R. (2024) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71232-6_7 · Cited by 4
AI-Assisted Assessment for Diverse Learners
Trajkovski, G., & Hayes, H. (2025) · Digital education and learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88252-4_6 · Cited by 7
Zambrano, A. F., Singhal, S., Pankiewicz, M., Baker, R. S., Porter, C., & Liu, X. (2025) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-11-2024-0156 · Cited by 3
Self-citationFlores, J. I. L., & García, C. C. (2025) · Revista Venezolana de Investigación en Educación Matemática · doi:10.54541/reviem.v5i2.154 · Cited by 3
Belitz, C., Bosch, N., Jiang, L., Jivet, I., Kirouchenassamy, B., Lee, H., Leporini, B., Malloci, F. M., Marras, M., Rotelli, D., et al. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99267-4_40 · Cited by 2
Igoche, B. I., Matthew, O., & Olabanji, D. (2025) · Knowledge · doi:10.3390/knowledge5030015 · Cited by 2
Ashwin, T. S., Sanda, N., Timalsina, U., & Biswas, G. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98465-5_49 · Cited by 2
Horvath, K., Frei, A. I., & Steinberg, M. (2025) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2025.2531262 · Cited by 2
Li, H., Xing, W., Zhu, W., Zhang, S., & Liu, Z. (2025) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-025-09467-z · Cited by 3
Exploring The Use Of Custom Chatbots In Marketing Education
Flynn, K. (2025) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2025.2562265 · Cited by 2
Alrawashdeh, G. S., & Castillo, N. M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13772-6 · Cited by 2
The Multifaced Nature of Bias in AI: Impact on Model Generalization, Robustness, and Fairness
Ntoutsi, E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-48522-1_11 · Cited by 2
MIIAM: An Algorithmic Model for Predicting Multimedia Effectiveness in eLearning Systems
Chikasha, S., Petegem, W. V., & Revesai, Z. (2025) · Digital · doi:10.3390/digital5040058 · Cited by 2
Vieriu, A. M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15111522 · Cited by 5
From prediction to parity: a quantitative analysis of algorithmic fairness in higher education
Akbar, A., & Husain, S. S. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00888-1 · Cited by 2
Conceição, S. C. O., & Hill, L. H. (2025) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.70019 · Cited by 1
Yang, M., Luo, T., Herman, K., Li, B., Chappell, S., Glaser, N. J., & Jiang, S. (2025) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-025-09476-y · Cited by 3
Cortez, L. H. V., Veloz, J. F. A., Oyarvide, W. R. V., Humanante, P. M. T., & Ramírez, C. S. T. (2025) · Data & Metadata · doi:10.56294/dm20261295 · Cited by 4
Stride Towards Fair AI: Addressing Algorithmic Prejudices in Human Resource Analytics
Dubey, S., & Vachher, L. (2025) · Abhigyan · doi:10.1177/09702385251389336 · Cited by 3
Benefits and Ethical Implications of Using Generative AI in PhD Students' Research Activities
Gonçalves, B. F. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-10731-2_11 · Cited by 2
融合AI的医学英语教学模式构建研究：理论基础、模式特征与实践路径
Yang, M., & Liang, L. (2026) · 香港文理研究院学报 · doi:10.71290/jas01020008 · Cited by 2
Wu, Y. (2025) · Al lnnovations and Applications · doi:10.63944/sj51.aia · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence in Gifted STEAM Education
Milakis, E. D., Argyrakou, C. C., & Samala, A. D. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0101-1.ch008 · Cited by 2
Wang, X., suo, X., & Ji, Y. (2026) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2026.2642201 · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence in Schools
Zoelfakar, N., & Ibrahim, A. S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0388-6.ch002 · Cited by 2
The double edge of communicative AI: continuity and disruption in higher education
Breiter, A., & Lopez, P. (2026) · i-com · doi:10.1515/icom-2026-0007 · Cited by 4
Mehlan, R., Heß, C., Stierstorfer, Q., & Schaaff, K. (2026) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4423-3_5 · Cited by 2
A meta-synthesis study on the use of artificial intelligence in primary education
Polat, S., & SARIDAŞ, G. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03007-8 · Cited by 2
Demystifying AI: The urgency of a critical stance on the use of AI systems in education
Heeg, D. M., & Avraamidou, L. (2026) · Prospects · doi:10.1007/s11125-026-09760-4 · Cited by 5
Filho, W. L., Sigahi, T. F. A. C., Skouloudis, A., Rampasso, I. S., & Anholon, R. (2026) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124681 · Cited by 3
Exploring Student Acceptance of AI Teaching Assistants in African Higher Education
Hu, Z. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5030053 · Cited by 2
Peril and Promise in Ethical Use of Learning Analytics for SoTL
Skene, A. (2022) · Ethics and integrity in educational contexts · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11810-4_2 · Cited by 2
Electronic evidence in arbitration proceedings
Ferreira, D. B., & Gromova, E. A. (2023) · Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review · doi:10.14296/deeslr.v20i.5608 · Cited by 2
Toward a New Paradigm: Learning Analytics 2.0
Penniston, T. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34735-1_11 · Cited by 2
Learning Engineering Perspectives for Supporting Educational Systems
Craig, S. D., Goodell, J., Czerwinski, E., Lis, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/21695067231192886 · Cited by 2
Evaluating Recommendation System Bias on a Public Dataset based on Demographic Information
Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2023) · doi:10.59200/icarti.2023.019 · Cited by 2
Melnikova, J., & Šakytė-Statnickė, G. (2024) · Regional Formation and Development Studies · doi:10.15181/rfds.v42i1.2603 · Cited by 2
Ethical AIED and AIED Ethics: Toward Synergy Between AIED Research and Ethical Frameworks
Borchers, C., Liu, X., Lee, H. H., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64315-6_2 · Cited by 2
AI-enabled correction: A professor’s journey
Daly, P., & Deglaire, E. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2024.2390486 · Cited by 5
Dar, A. A., Yadav, S. S., Tripathi, R. K., Albalawi, O., Jain, A., & Gautam, P. L. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6170-2.ch011 · Cited by 3
Integrating AI Into Policy Making in Educational Leadership
Mitchell, D. L. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6130-6.ch002 · Cited by 2
Díaz‐Guerra, D. D. (2024) · PSIQUEMAG/ Revista Científica Digital de Psicología · doi:10.18050/psiquemag.v13i2.3138 · Cited by 4
Revolutionizing PE Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Vietnamese Universities
Thuc, D. C. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8744-3.ch011 · Cited by 2
Innovative Question Types and Formats
Trajkovski, G., & Hayes, H. (2025) · Digital education and learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88252-4_3 · Cited by 2
Research Issues and Challenges in Higher Education
Peddi, S., & Manoharan, G. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0654-4.ch011 · Cited by 3
Ten simple guidelines for decolonising algorithmic systems
O’Neale, D. R. J., Wilson, D., Brown, P. T., Dickinson, P., Rickus-Graham, M., & Ropeti, A. (2025) · Journal of Responsible Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jrt.2025.100125 · Cited by 2
Strategies for Culturally Responsive AI in Education: Mitigating Bias and Enhancing Student Outcomes
Oyetade, K., Harmse, A., & Zuva, T. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6932-5_2 · Cited by 3
Powers and limitations of open world learning
Rienties, B. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003177098-2 · Cited by 2
Accinelli, C., Catania, B., & Guerrini, G. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata55660.2022.10020717 · Cited by 2
Towards Fair Detection of AI-Generated Essays in Large-Scale Writing Assessments
Jiang, Y., Hao, J., Fauß, M., & Li, C. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64312-5_38 · Cited by 2
Melnikova, J., Batuchina, A., Šakytė-Statnickė, G., & Šmitienė, G. (2022) · Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia · doi:10.15388/actpaed.2022.48.8 · Cited by 1
Do we Reach Desired Disparate Impact with In-Processing Fairness Techniques?
Radovanović, S., Delibašić, B., & Suknović, M. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.173 · Cited by 2
Improving students’ understanding of geometry concepts through dynamic geometry computer software
Adelabu, F. M., Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, S. M. (2022) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk376.10 · Cited by 1
Computers and care? How can ICT integration help to build supportive PLC in ITE?
Agherdien, N. (2022) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk376.02 · Cited by 1
Striking a Balance in Fairness for Dynamic Systems Through Reinforcement Learning
Hu, Y., Lear, J., & Zhang, L. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata59044.2023.10386299 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Assessment Systems in Higher Education
Al-Amin, M., Saqui, F. Z., & Khan, M. R. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2145-4.ch002 · Cited by 1
Yadav, M., Singh, S. K., Chandel, A., & Hung, T. H. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0884-4.ch008 · Cited by 1
Countering flaws in algorithm design and applications: a Delphi study
Gokhale, A. A. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02124-6 · Cited by 1
Fair Artificial Intelligence to Support STEM Education
Xing, W., & Li, C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198882077.003.0023 · Cited by 2
Adaptive serious games assessment: The case of the blood transfusion game in nursing education
Ifenthaler, D., Şahi̇n, M., Boo, I., Rajasegeran, D. D., & Yuh, A. S. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100351 · Cited by 1
Empowering Gender Equality and Justice Through AI
Dhar, S., Dasgupta, M., & Singh, B. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9395-6.ch005 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence and Students Happiness
Aboudahr, S. M. F. M., Al-Showaikh, F., & Nalliah, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7332-3.ch021 · Cited by 1
Foundations of AI in Educational Assessment
Trajkovski, G. P., & Hayes, H. (2025) · Digital education and learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88252-4_1 · Cited by 1
McDermott, B., & Eaton, S. E. (2025) · Advances in business ethics research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77665-6_6 · Cited by 1
Designing Ethical and Equitable AI-Supported Educational Games
Cömert, Z. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1827-1.ch005 · Cited by 1
Identifying and analyzing ‘noisy’ spelling errors in a second language corpus
Juffs, A., & Naismith, B. (2025) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.wnut-1.4 · Cited by 1
Ali, M., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87604-2_10 · Cited by 1
Prioritizing Risks in AI-Enabled EdTech Platforms: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach
Roy, A. P., Anand, K., Elangovan, N., & Halaswamy, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-1918-4_39 · Cited by 1
Olivier, C., & Weilbach, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98185-2_10 · Cited by 2
Ashley, M. S. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1122-7.ch003 · Cited by 1
Boriati, D., & D’Ambrosio, M. (2025) · Community Notebook People Education and Welfare in the Society 5 0 · doi:10.61007/qdc.2025.1.272 · Cited by 1
Integrating AI in Outcome-Based Education
Yani, A., & Rosita, R. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1062-6.ch005 · Cited by 1
English, V. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.53935/2641-533x.v8i4.467 · Cited by 2
Is AI in Higher Education a Real Help for Students?
Hossain, A., Shazed, A. N., Haque, M. M., Alif, A., & Alam, S. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6018-8.ch009 · Cited by 1
Barrera, M. A. O., Álvarez, L., & Maciel, J. P. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2685-6.ch004 · Cited by 1
Revolutionizing Vocational Education
Wenpang, L., Yingsoon, G. Y., Rahman, N. A. B. A., Chua, N. A., Suyan, Z., Yiming, C., & Xiaoyao, T. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5102-5.ch008 · Cited by 1
From Chalkboards to Chatbots: AI in Modern Education
Rawas, S., & Samala, A. D. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83708-432-620251008 · Cited by 1
Stanja, J., Dannemann, S., Krugel, J., & Hoppe, A. (2025) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2025.2538834 · Cited by 3
Chinaka, L. (2025) · Conference on United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education Research (UKICER) · doi:10.1145/3754508.3754535 · Cited by 1
Rethinking Educational Assessment in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Arias-Oliva, M., Pérez-Portabella, A., Sesé, M. O., & Sánchez, J. D. A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01429-0_24 · Cited by 1
Teachers' and Students' Views on AI Writing Tools' Adverse Effects in EFL Writings
Zahra, M., & Fithriani, R. (2025) · Jurnal Onoma Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra · doi:10.30605/onoma.v11i3.6554 · Cited by 1
Kostanyan, S., & Fortino, A. (2025) · IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) · doi:10.1109/isec64801.2025.11147425 · Cited by 2
Romero, M. Á. M., Erazo-Arteaga, V. A., Jaya, D. W. B., Mireles, M. Á. R., Rivas-Díaz, J. P., Montemayor, A. D. S., & Vaca, D. I. G. (2025) · Seminars in Medical Writing and Education · doi:10.56294/mw2025424 · Cited by 2
From the lab to the civil society: data literacy comes of age
Varga, K. H., & Koltay, T. (2025) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-05-2025-0126 · Cited by 1
A Study on the Application of AI Tutors Integrating Multimodal Data in Predicting Student Behavior
Shao, Y., & Gong, B. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on IOT, Data Science and Advanced Computing (IDSAC) · doi:10.1109/idsac65763.2025.11170151 · Cited by 1
Xu, Q. (2025) · Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54097/z2fn2d44 · Cited by 1
Wang, J. N., & Gan, Q. (2025) · International Conference on Educational Knowledge and Informatization (EKI) · doi:10.1145/3765325.3765348 · Cited by 1
Designing AI-Enhanced Sustainable TVET Programs
Chhetri, N. R., Saha, S., Mohapatra, H., & Nawed, J. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3872-9.ch012 · Cited by 1
Ethical considerations in artificial intelligence-powered patient counseling
Patne, A. Y., & Suryawanshic, M. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-43823-3.00011-x · Cited by 1
Assessment in Higher Education in the Era of Generative AI
Eren, S. U. N. A., & Özer, M. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7579-3.ch008 · Cited by 1
Sistemas de Aprendizaje Adaptativo: revisión sistemática de técnicas y tendencias
Peña, L. V. (2025) · Revista 3i Ingeniería Innovación Investigación · doi:10.70448/revista3i.v4i1.187 · Cited by 1
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION OF STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS
Lessing, M.-J., & Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2025) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/25.83.786 · Cited by 1
AI Governance for Workforce Development: A Conceptual Framework for Reskilling and Upskilling
Yasser, E. H., & Abdelmajid, E. (2025) · International Conference on New Trends in Computational Intelligence (NTCI) · doi:10.1109/ntci67886.2025.11308347 · Cited by 1
Yapay Zekâ Uygulamalarına Yönelik Öğretmen Görüşleri: SWOT Analizi
Arslan, K., Köşger, N., & Arı, A. G. (2025) · Kuram ve Uygulamada Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.48066/kusob.1817791 · Cited by 1
A Framework for Responsible AI in Higher Education
Bilgin, H. (2025) · Higher Education Governance and Policy · doi:10.55993/hegp.1788343 · Cited by 2
Defensive Attribution of AI Fairness: The Role of Procedural Fairness in AI’s Moral Responsibility
Chen, M., & Lee, Y.-H. (2026) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2025.2610624 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligent: An Effective Tool for Knowledge Management in Higher Education
Bimol, S., & Meetei, M. I. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13003-7_24 · Cited by 1
Meaningful Human Control Over AI Military Decision Support Systems: Exploring Key Challenges
Kozlovski, A. (2026) · Military and humanitarian health ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11331-3_8 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Ryan S.
- ORCID
- Baker, Ryan S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1052-1092
- ISSN
- 1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3214911045
- Semantic Scholar
- 38472f9d5ba1c93fcbc33b294ff9747a63988d3a
- Cited by
- 993
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 393 · 2025: 276 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 59
- FWCI
- 101.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schmidt Futures
- University of Pennsylvania
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, artificial intelligence in education, algorithmic fairness, bias metrics, racial and ethnic bias, gender bias, nationality bias, socioeconomic status, disability, military-connected students, educational equity, bias mitigation, machine learning pipelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
