The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic Bias in Education
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we review algorithmic bias in education, discussing the causes of that bias and reviewing the empirical literature on the specific ways that algorithmic bias is known to have manifested in education. While other recent work has reviewed mathematical definitions of fairness and expanded algorithmic approaches to reducing bias, our review focuses instead on solidifying the current understanding of the concrete impacts of algorithmic bias in education—which groups are known to be impacted and which stages and agents in the development and deployment of educational algorithms are implicated. We discuss theoretical and formal perspectives on algorithmic bias, connect those perspectives to the machine learning pipeline, and review metrics for assessing bias. Next, we review the evidence around algorithmic bias in education, beginning with the most heavily-studied categories of race/ethnicity, gender, and nationality, and moving to the available evidence of bias for less-studied categories, such as socioeconomic status, disability, and military-connected status. Acknowledging the gaps in what has been studied, we propose a framework for moving from unknown bias to known bias and from fairness to equity. We discuss obstacles to addressing these challenges and propose four areas of effort for mitigating and resolving the problems of algorithmic bias in AIED systems and other educational technology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Empirical studies show that AI systems may replicate social and cultural inequalities embedded in training data, influencing assessment outcomes and learning opportunities (Baker & Hawn, 2022;Barbierato et al., 2022;Deho et al., 2023;Jiang & Pardos, 2021).”
From Academic Integrity and Students’ Ethical Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Similarly, ChatGPT's apparent fluency can encourage students to skip ethical consideration or critical examination, particularly when its biases remain hidden (Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Their review shows that algorithmic harms are often amplified in educational systems that rely heavily on predictive modelling for assessments, admissions, or instructional personalisation.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Moreover, Baker and Hawn (2022) caution that automation may subtly displace critical judgment, especially in repetitive tasks or environments with ambiguous accountability structures.”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Students consistently identified the limitations of GenAI tools, whether factual errors in ChatGPT's market data or Eurocentric imagery generated by DALL•E, and responded by applying evaluative strategies (Rana, 2024;Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“When not accompanied by ethical framing, structured experimentation, and critical reflection, GenAI tools may encourage automation bias, epistemic shallowness, and dependency (Zhai et al., 2024;Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Generative AI in Design Thinking Pedagogy: Enhancing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Ethical Reasoning in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“shows that bias can enter at multiple stages of the machine-learning pipeline and affect groups defined not only by race, gender, or nationality but also by socioeconomic status and disability (Baker & Hawn, 2022).”
From Responsible AI in Polish Higher-Education Administration under the EU AI Act: High-Risk Use Cases, Fundamental-Rights Impact Assessment, and Institutional Accountability (2026) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2022
In the citing paper
“Researchers have also highlighted the lack of perspective of people with disabilities in AI fairness (Baker & Hawn, 2021;Trewin, 2018).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
In the citing paper
“Research on the use of AI in education and disability is still scarce (Baker & Hawn, 2021)”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
In the citing paper
“The opinions and experiences of students with disabilities are essential because they are often overlooked (Baker & Hawn, 2021;Sullivan et al., 2023).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
In the citing paper
“Educational uses of generative AI pose several other challenges. One is the perpetuation of biases and discrimination, potentially reinforcing racial or gender-based stereotypes during personalized learning, automated scoring, and admission processes (88, 90).”
From The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making (2024) · cites this paper as [90]
In the citing paper
“However, the proliferation of AI in education also raises pertinent ethical concerns, including data privacy, algorithmic biases, and the digital divide (Baker & Hawn, 2021;Ifenthaler, 2023).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners (2024) · cites this paper as Baker & Hawn, 2021
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · Cited by 10,551
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Smith, L. T. (2024) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,767
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax2342 · Cited by 7,137 · cited 1×
“…2019; Telford, 2019); racial bias in sentencing decisions (Angwin et al., 2016), racial bias in identifying patients for additional health care (Obermeyer et al., 2019), and -- in education -- bias in standardized testing and its resulting impact on high stakes admission decisions (Dorans,…”
BackgroundA Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3457607 · Cited by 5,812
Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild
Soomro, K., Zamir, A. R., & Shah, M. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.0402 · Cited by 4,575
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé, H., & Crawford, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09010 · Cited by 2,474
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3458723 · Cited by 2,469
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bird, S., Dale, R., Dorr, B. J., Gibson, B., Joseph, M. T., Kan, M. Y., Lee, D., Powley, B., Radev, D. R., & Tan, Y. F. (2008). No Title. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1755–1759.
- Cramer, H., Holstein, K., Vaughan, J. W., Daumé, H., Dudik, M., Wallach, H., Reddy, S., & Jean, G.-G. [The Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*)]. (2019). FAT* 2019 translation tutorial: Challenges of incorporating algorithmic fairness [video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/UicKZv93SOY
- Crawford, K. [The Artificial Intelligence Channel]. (2017). The Trouble with Bias - NIPS 2017 Keynote - Kate Crawford [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/fMym_BKWQzk
- Holstein, K. & Doroudi, S. (in press). Equity and artificial intelligence in education: Will “AIEd” Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education? Invited chapter in Porayska-Pomsta, K. & Holmes, W. (Eds.), Ethics in AIED: Who Cares? Data, algorithms, equity and biases in educational contexts. Routledge Press.
- Howley, I. (2018) If an algorithm is openly accessible, and no one can understand it, is it actually open? In Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshop on Ethics in AIED 2018.
- Li, X., Song, D., Han, M., Zhang, Y., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2021). On the limits of algorithmic prediction across the globe. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15212. · arXiv
- Soundarajan, S., & Clausen, D. L. (2018). Equal Protection Under the Algorithm: A Legal-Inspired Framework for Identifying Discrimination in Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education
Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074 · Cited by 863
Longo, L., Brcic, M., Cabitza, F., Choi, J., Confalonieri, R., Ser, J. D., Guidotti, R., Hayashi, Y., Herrera, F., Holzinger, A., et al. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102301 · Cited by 626
AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3221 · Cited by 581
Holt‐Lunstad, J. (2024) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21224 · Cited by 541
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152 · Cited by 416
Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0 · Cited by 391
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Capraro, V., Lentsch, A., Acemoglu, D., Akgun, S., Akhmedova, A., Bilancini, E., Bonnefon, J.-F., Brañas-Garza, P., Butera, L., Douglas, K. M., et al. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae191 · Cited by 371
Revolutionizing education through AI: A comprehensive review of enhancing learning experiences
Onesi-Ozigagun, O., Ololade, Y. J., Eyo-Udo, N. L., & Ogundipe, D. O. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences · doi:10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1011 · Cited by 262
Cukurova, M. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13514 · Cited by 302
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Practices, Challenges, and Debates
Holmes, W., & Porayska-Pomsta, K. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9780429329067 · Cited by 258
Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners
Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J., & Shimada, A. (2024) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09747-0 · Cited by 238
Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Higher Education Institutions: A Systems Approach
Katsamakas, E., Pavlov, O. V., & Saklad, R. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16146118 · Cited by 195
ED-AI Lit: An Interdisciplinary Framework for AI Literacy in Education
Allen, L. K., & Kendeou, P. (2023) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/23727322231220339 · Cited by 217
The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education
Williams, R. T. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607 · Cited by 183
Digital equity and inclusion in education
Gottschalk, F., & Weise, C. (2023) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/7cb15030-en · Cited by 268
Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/caraaq92 · Cited by 146
Assessing AI adoption in developing country academia: A trust and privacy-augmented UTAUT framework
Rana, M. M., Siddiqee, M. S., Sakib, M. N., & Ahamed, M. R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37569 · Cited by 143
Pack, A., & Maloney, J. S. (2023) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3253 · Cited by 140
The ethics of using AI in K-12 education: a systematic literature review
Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., & Burden, K. (2025) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2024.2428601 · Cited by 141
Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review
García-López, I. M., & Trujillo-Liñán, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938 · Cited by 144
“For example, while previous studies have explored issues such as algorithmic biases (Baker and Hawn, 2022; Smith, 2020) or automated feedback (Bauer et al., 2023), this analysis highlights the need for an interdisciplinary approach that combines legal governance, digital literacy and clear ethical…”
Artificial intelligence and education governance
Filgueiras, F. D. B. (2023) · Education Citizenship and Social Justice · doi:10.1177/17461979231160674 · Cited by 150
The life cycle of large language models in education: A framework for understanding sources of bias
Lee, J., Hicke, Y., Yu, R., Brooks, C., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13505 · Cited by 119
Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Adekomaya, V. O. (2024) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.23.3.4 · Cited by 128
Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13233 · Cited by 120
Propagation of societal gender inequality by internet search algorithms
Vlasceanu, M., & Amodio, D. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2204529119 · Cited by 109
Lavidas, K., Voulgari, I., Papadakis, S., Athanassopoulos, S., Anastasiou, A., Filippidi, A., Komis, V., & Karacapilidis, N. I. (2024) · Information · doi:10.3390/info15060314 · Cited by 181
González-Sendino, R., Serrano, E., & Bajo, J. (2024) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2024.02.023 · Cited by 119
Arizmendi, C. J., Bernacki, M. L., Raković, M., Plumley, R. D., Urban, C. J., Panter, A. T., Greene, J. A., & Gates, K. M. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01939-9 · Cited by 141
Using Artificial Intelligence in TESOL: Some Ethical and Pedagogical Considerations
Pack, A., & Maloney, J. S. (2024) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.3320 · Cited by 122
Bell, A., Solano-Kamaiko, I., Nov, O., & Stoyanovich, J. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533090 · Cited by 103
Advancing algorithmic bias management capabilities in AI-driven marketing analytics research
Akter, S., Sultana, S., Mariani, M. M., Wamba, S. F., Spanaki, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.08.013 · Cited by 127
A Scoping Survey of ChatGPT in Mathematics Education
Pepin, B., Buchholtz, N. F., & Salinas-Hernández, U. (2025) · Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s40751-025-00172-1 · Cited by 166
Artificial intelligence in multimodal learning analytics: a systematic literature review
Mohammadi, M., Tajik, E., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., Tomaszewski, W., & Khosravi, H. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100426 · Cited by 85
Roshanaei, M. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12605-2 · Cited by 84
Wang, C., Li, Z., & Bonk, C. J. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100247 · Cited by 117
Farrow, R. (2023) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2023.2185630 · Cited by 81
Artificial Intelligence: An Untapped Opportunity for Equity and Access in STEM Education
Kohnke, S., & Zaugg, T. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15010068 · Cited by 99
Perspectives of Generative AI in Chemistry Education Within the TPACK Framework
Feldman-Maggor, Y., Blonder, R., & Alexandron, G. (2024) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10147-3 · Cited by 115
Critical GenAI Literacy: Postdigital Configurations
Rapanta, C., Bhatt, I., Bozkurt, A., Chubb, L. A., Erb, C., Forsler, I., Gravett, K., Koole, M. L., Lintner, T., Örtegren, A., et al. (2025) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-025-00573-w · Cited by 87
Samuel, Y., Brennan‐Tonetta, M., Samuel, J., Kashyap, R. K., Kumar, V., Kaashyap, S. K., Chidipothu, N., Anand, I., & Jain, P. H. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1198180 · Cited by 90
Deho, O. B., Zhan, C., Li, J., Liu, J., Liu, L., & Le, T. D. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13217 · Cited by 87
Jiang, Y., Hao, J., Fauss, M., & Li, C. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105070 · Cited by 68
O’Dea, X., Tsz Kit Ng, D., O’Dea, M., & Shkuratskyy, V. (2026) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/14782103241287401 · Cited by 69
A systematic literature review of data privacy and security research on smart tourism
Gong, Y., & Schroeder, A. (2022) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2022.101019 · Cited by 78
Ramnarain, U. D., Ogegbo, A. A., Penn, M., Ojetunde, S. M., & Mdlalose, N. (2024) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-024-10159-z · Cited by 100
Explainable AI In Education : Current Trends, Challenges, And Opportunities
Rachha, A., & Seyam, M. (2023) · SoutheastCon 2023 · doi:10.1109/southeastcon51012.2023.10115140 · Cited by 68
Viberg, O., Kizilcec, R. F., Wise, A. F., Jivet, I., & Nixon, N. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13507 · Cited by 95
Tuomi, I. (2022) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12531 · Cited by 66
Buele, J., & Llerena-Aguirre, L. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1603763 · Cited by 104
Sha, L., Rakovic, M., Das, A., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2022.3196278 · Cited by 67
Could the Use of AI in Higher Education Hinder Students With Disabilities? A Scoping Review
Pierrès, O., Christen, M., Schmitt, F., & Darvishy, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3365368 · Cited by 72
Empathic pedagogical conversational agents: A systematic literature review
Ortega‐Ochoa, E., Arguedas, M., & Daradoumis, T. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13413 · Cited by 61
Wang, D., Bian, C., & Chen, G. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13466 · Cited by 77
Gender biases within Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT: Evidence, Sources of Biases and Solutions
Ho, J. Q. H., Hartanto, A., Koh, A., & Majeed, N. M. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100145 · Cited by 83
Debiasing Education Algorithms
Idowu, J. A. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00389-4 · Cited by 84
Multimodality of AI for Education: Toward Artificial General Intelligence
Lee, G., Shi, L., Latif, E., Gao, Y., Bewersdorff, A., Nyaaba, M., Guo, S., Liu, Z., Mai, G., Liu, T., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3574466 · Cited by 192
Allison, J., Hwang, G., Mayer, R. E., Πέλλας, Ν., Karnalim, O., de Freitas, S., Ng, O., Huang, Y., Hooshyar, D., Seidman, R. H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331251359964 · Cited by 71
Methodological and Technological Advancements in E-Learning
Dritsas, E., & Τρίγκα, Μ. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16010056 · Cited by 93
León, C. E. Y., Lipuma, J. M., & Torres, X. O. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1619888 · Cited by 85
AI-Powered E-Learning for Lifelong Learners: Impact on Performance and Knowledge Application
Ahn, H. Y. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16209066 · Cited by 56
El–Sappagh, S., Alonso, J. M., Abuhmed, T., Ali, F., & Bugarín, A. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10415-5 · Cited by 57
They shall be fair, transparent, and robust: auditing learning analytics systems
Simbeck, K. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00292-7 · Cited by 43
Using artificial intelligence in sustainability teaching and learning
Filho, W. L., Kim, E., Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Marcolin, C. B. (2025) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/s12302-025-01159-w · Cited by 70
Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8 · Cited by 48
“Research on the use of AI in education and disability is still scarce (Baker & Hawn, 2021) and it is not clear how sharing disability status could impact students with impairments.”
InfluentialDelcker, J., Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10418-1 · Cited by 49
Using fair AI to predict students’ math learning outcomes in an online platform
Li, C., Xing, W., & Leite, W. L. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2115076 · Cited by 55
Bird, K., Castleman, B., & Song, Y. (2024) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22569 · Cited by 60
Ahmed, W. M., Azhari, A. A., Alfaraj, A., Alhamadani, A., Zhang, M., & Lu, C. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28198 · Cited by 49
Generative AI and Its Educational Implications
Łodzikowski, K., Foltz, P. W., & Behrens, J. T. (2024) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64487-0_2 · Cited by 45
Hybrid Models for Knowledge Tracing: A Systematic Literature Review
Zanellati, A., Mitri, D. D., Gabbrielli, M., & Levrini, O. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3348690 · Cited by 53
Enhancing children’s understanding of algorithmic biases in and with text-to-image generative AI
Vartiainen, H., Kahila, J., Tedre, M., López‐Pernas, S., & Pope, N. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448241252820 · Cited by 67
Rana, V., Verhoeven, B., & Sharma, M. (2025) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/tjse2f36 · Cited by 48
Moral Machines or Tyranny of the Majority? A Systematic Review on Predictive Bias in Education
Li, L., Sha, L., Li, Y., Raković, M., Rong, J., Joksimovíc, S., Selwyn, N., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3576050.3576119 · Cited by 52
Artificial Intelligence in Special Education
Harkins-Brown, A. R., Carling, L. Z., & Peloff, D. C. (2025) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia5010011 · Cited by 41
Implementing equitable and intersectionality‐aware ML in education: A practical guide
Mangal, M., & Pardos, Z. A. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13484 · Cited by 52
Toward Asset-based Instruction and Assessment in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Ocumpaugh, J. L., Roscoe, R. D., Baker, R. S., Hutt, S. J., & Aguilar, S. J. (2024) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-023-00382-x · Cited by 51
Self-citationEthical Considerations in AI Development
Singh, B. P., & Joshi, A. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-2964-1.ch010 · Cited by 43
Can Artificial Intelligence Improve Gender Equality? Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Bao, L., Huang, D., & Lin, C. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.02787 · Cited by 77
Chen, Z. (2024) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843241273316 · Cited by 41
Renkema, M., & Tursunbayeva, A. (2024) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103453 · Cited by 53
Inclusive learning using industry 4.0 technologies: addressing student diversity in modern education
Ahmad, I., Sharma, S., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Gupta, L. R., Thakur, A. K., Priyadarshi, N., & Twala, B. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2330235 · Cited by 37
Investigating algorithmic bias in student progress monitoring
Idowu, J. A., Koshiyama, A., & Treleaven, P. C. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100267 · Cited by 38
Lillywhite, B., & Wolbring, G. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142013519 · Cited by 52
Al-Abri, A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13484-x · Cited by 53
Should learning analytics models include sensitive attributes? Explaining the why
Deho, O. B., Joksimovic, S., Li, J., Zhan, C., Liu, J., & Liu, L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2022.3226474 · Cited by 35
Bozdağ, A. A. (2023) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/13414 · Cited by 42
Fairness, Trust, Transparency, Equity, and Responsibility in Learning Analytics
Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2023) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2023.7983 · Cited by 35
How to mitigate the risks of deployment of artificial intelligence in medicine?
İlikhan, S. U., Özer, M., Tanberkan, H., & Bozkurt, V. (2024) · TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES · doi:10.55730/1300-0144.5814 · Cited by 46
Anderson, J. E., Nguyen, C. A., & Moreira, G. (2025) · The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-10-2024-0240 · Cited by 33
Hlosta, M., Herodotou, C., Papathoma, T., Gillespie, A., & Bergamin, P. B. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100108 · Cited by 52
Prinsloo, P., Khalil, M., & Slade, S. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13508 · Cited by 32
Why explainable AI may not be enough: predictions and mispredictions in decision making in education
Saqr, M., & López‐Pernas, S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00343-4 · Cited by 32
Han, B., Nawaz, S., Buchanan, G., & McKay, D. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00456-4 · Cited by 32
Artificial intelligence bias auditing – current approaches, challenges and lessons from practice
Lacmanović, S., & Škare, M. (2025) · Review of Accounting and Finance · doi:10.1108/raf-01-2025-0006 · Cited by 43
Arévalo-Cordovilla, F. E., & Peña, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-15388-9 · Cited by 32
Hao, X., Demir, E., & Eyers, D. R. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101152 · Cited by 44
Artificial intelligence (AI) and ethical concerns: a review and research agenda
Ghosh, M. (2025) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2025.2551809 · Cited by 46
Warr, M., & Heath, M. K. (2025) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/00224871251325073 · Cited by 35
Fairness for machine learning software in education: A systematic mapping study
Pham, N., Ngoc, H. P., & Nguyen‐Duc, A. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244 · Cited by 48
Harvey, E., Koenecke, A., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713210 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, Ryan S.
- ORCID
- Baker, Ryan S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1052-1092
- ISSN
- 1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3214911045
- Semantic Scholar
- 38472f9d5ba1c93fcbc33b294ff9747a63988d3a
- Cited by
- 993
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 393 · 2025: 276 · 2024: 165 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 59
- FWCI
- 101.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schmidt Futures
- University of Pennsylvania
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- algorithmic bias, artificial intelligence in education, algorithmic fairness, bias metrics, racial and ethnic bias, gender bias, nationality bias, socioeconomic status, disability, military-connected students, educational equity, bias mitigation, machine learning pipelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
