Cited by 24Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Mental Health Service Utilization Among Medical Students with a Perceived Need for Care

Phillips, Matthew S., Steelesmith, Danielle L., Brock, Guy, Benedict, Jason, Muñoz, Jessica, Fontanella, Cynthia A.·2022·Academic Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The authors investigated levels of perceived need for help, patterns of mental health service utilization, and barriers to care among US medical students with a focus on students who perceived a need for help but did not report service use in the past 12 months.Methods The authors administered an online survey to 2,868 medical students at three schools in Ohio between January and February 2020 including validated scales for psychological distress, self-stigma, and an exploration of mental health treatment. The authors used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with treatment and qualitative analysis to identify common barriers to care.Results Twenty-eight percent (N = 800) of 2,868 students responded to the survey. Fifty-six percent (n = 439) of students reported a perceived need for help, while 34.6% of these respondents (n = 152) did not receive treatment. Among those with perceived need who completed the survey (n = 388), Asian students compared to non-Hispanic white students (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.82) and those with higher self-stigma (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.94) had lower odds of service use. Students told by others to seek help (aOR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.71-4.64) were the only group with higher odds of service use. The most common barriers to care were lack of time, difficulty accessing services, and stigma.Conclusions Despite a perceived need for help, many students do not seek care and experience treatment barriers. Schools can encourage help-seeking by identifying students in need, using targeted messaging, fostering a low-stigma environment, and removing barriers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40596-021-01584-y

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, M. S., Steelesmith, D. L., Brock, G., Benedict, J., Muñoz, J., & Fontanella, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Matthew S.
Venue
Academic Psychiatry
Published
2022-01-10
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
223-227
ISSN
  • 1042-9670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7230
OpenAlex
W4205520159
Cited by
24
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio State Medical Alumni Society
  • Ohio Psychiatric Physicians Foundation
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001070)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
medical students, mental health service utilization, help-seeking, perceived need for help, barriers to care, self-stigma, psychological distress, racial and ethnic differences, student mental health
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review