Cited by 583Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMental Health Treatment and AccessInnovations in Medical Education

Depressed Medical Studentsʼ Use of Mental Health Services and Barriers to Use

Givens, Jane L., Tjia, Jennifer·2002·Academic Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Depression is an underrecognized yet common and treatable disorder among medical students. Little is known about the rate of mental health service use by depressed medical students. This study sought to determine the level of mental health service use by depressed medical students and their reported barriers to use. METHOD: In the spring of 1994, a one-time survey of 194 first- and second-year medical students was conducted in the School of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. Outcome measures were self-reported use of counseling services, barriers to use, suicidal ideation, and depressive symptoms as measured by the 13-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). RESULTS: Twenty-four percent (n = 46) of the medical students were depressed by BDI criteria. Of the depressed students, only 22% (n = 10) were using mental health counseling services. The most frequently cited barriers to using these services were lack of time (48%), lack of confidentiality (37%), stigma associated with using mental health services (30%), cost (28%), fear of documentation on academic record (24%), and fear of unwanted intervention (26%). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that depression among medical students may be undertreated. Medical schools can assist depressed students by addressing issues such as the stigma of using mental health services, confidentiality, and documentation. Early treatment of impaired future caregivers may have far-reaching implications for the individual students, their colleagues, and their future patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00024

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Givens, J. L., & Tjia, J.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Tjia, Jennifer
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2002-09
Volume
77
Issue
9
Pages
918-921
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045639353
Cited by
583
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 23
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
depression, medical students, mental health service utilization, barriers to care, help-seeking, stigma, confidentiality, suicidal ideation, Beck Depression Inventory, counseling services, undertreatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Confidentiality, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Severity of Illness Index, Students, Medical, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review