Cited by 17Social Media in Health EducationMedia Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Are you ready for the challenge? Social Media Health Challenges for Behaviour Change

Open access
Saboia, Inga, Almeida, Ana Margarida Pisco, Sousa, Pedro, Pernencar, Cláudia·2020·Perspectives on Behavior Science

Abstract

Challenges are one of the most common strategies used by Opinion Leaders on Social Media to engage users. They are often found in different areas; in the Health field, the use of challenges is growing, namely through initiatives aiming at eating behaviour change. Instagram is considered to be one of the most used Social Media applications to develop these initiatives, allowing Opinion Leaders to communicate and engage with their online followers. Despite this scenario, little is known regarding how Health Challenges are being used and what is their impact on behaviour change. Previous research has already shown how Opinion Leaders use Instagram to promote eating behaviour change. The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize, describe and discuss Social Media Health Challenges, aiming to analyse Instagram challenges on healthy eating. The study was organized in two phases: the first one is a literature review based on Prisma method that supported the conceptualisation of Social Media Challenges and the design for the second phase where Social Media Health Challenges of Opinion Leaders, such as Nutritionists, Health Lifestylers and Patient Opinion Leaders (POLS) were analysed. Results showed that most of the challenges are promoted by Patient Opinion Leaders and Health Lifestylers. Followers adhere to Social Media Health Challenges related to weight loss, engaging with Opinion Leaders. The psychological-cognitive components (such as habits, motivation, and self-control) were found in the analysed challenges, and Instagram is one of the used tools to promote these Initiatives. These results point to new paths regarding future research on other behaviour change online initiatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40614-020-00261-z

Cites

60 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center´s Internet & American Life Project Retrieved from https://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/.
  2. Glanz, K., Rimmer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds.). (2008). Health behavior and health education: Therory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Little, L., Sillence, E., & Joinson, A. (2017). Behavior Change research and theory: psycological and technological perspectives. London: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802690-8/00011-6. · DOI
  4. Sillence, E., Little, L., & Joinson, A. (2017). Digital behavior change. In Behavior change research and theory: Psychological and technological perspectives (pp. XI–XIV). London: Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Saboia, I., Almeida, A. M. P., Sousa, P., & Pernencar, C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Saboia, Inga
Venue
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Published
2020-07-28
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
543-578
ISSN
  • 2520-8969 (ISSN-L)
  • 2520-8977
OpenAlex
W3046009876
Cited by
13
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perspectives on Behavior Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/137451/2018)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
behavior change, opinion leaders, Instagram, dietary behavior change, healthy eating, nutritionists, weight loss, user engagement, motivation, self-control, habit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review