Cited by 28Adrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and CortisolClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Diagnostic performance of a newly developed salivary cortisol and cortisone measurement using an LC–MS/MS method with simple and rapid sample preparation

Mészáros, K., Karvaly, G., Márta, Z., Magda, B., Tőke, J., Szücs, N., Tóth, M., Rácz, K. +1 more·2018·Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

Abstract

Background Late-night salivary cortisol level is one of the first-line tests recommended by the Endocrine Society for the diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism. Most routine laboratories measure cortisol levels using immunoassay tests which fail to determine low cortisol levels accurately due to the numerous interfering substances. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method with simple and rapid sample preparation was developed for the simultaneous measurement of cortisol and cortisone and its performance in the diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism was evaluated.Methods 324 late-night saliva samples were analyzed from which 272 samples were derived from patients with a suspected diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism. Salivary cortisol levels were assayed using an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA, Cortisol II, Roche), and simultaneous measurement of cortisol and cortisone was performed using an LC-MS/MS method.Results A strong correlation between cortisol results measured using ECLIA and LC-MS/MS (r 2 = 0.892) was demonstrated. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed good diagnostic performance of cortisol and cortisone levels assayed using LC-MS/MS method and for cortisol measured using ECLIA.Conclusions Late-night salivary cortisol and cortisone are useful parameters for the diagnosis of hypercortisolism. Using samples obtained from patients where the diagnosis of hypercortisolism is extremely challenging cut-off values for midnight salivary cortisol and cortisone measured by LC-MS/MS method were established.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40618-017-0743-6

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mészáros, K., Karvaly, G., Márta, Z., Magda, B., Tőke, J., Szücs, N., Tóth, M., Rácz, K., & Patócs, A.
Affiliations
Semmelweis University (HU)
Corresponding author
Patócs, A.
Venue
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Published
2017-08-16
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
315-323
ISSN
  • 0391-4097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1720-8386
OpenAlex
W2747997849
Cited by
27
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinological Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Semmelweis University Repository (Semmelweis University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bionics Innovation Center (Grant for Medicinal Bionics)
  • Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (Lendulet 2013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
salivary cortisol, salivary cortisone, endogenous hypercortisolism, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, diagnostic thresholds, sample preparation
MeSH terms
Biological Assay, Chromatography, Liquid, Cortisone, Cushing Syndrome, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Saliva, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review