Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture of integrity – institutional response to integrity during COVID19

Khan, Zeenath Reza, Priya, Joice, Tuffnell, Christopher·2022·International Journal for Educational Integrity

Abstract

COVID19 forced most education institutions to move their education provisions to digital platforms almost overnight to ensure continued learning for students. Variable factors relating to educational technologies, ease of use, accessibility and funding meant the process was more challenging for some than others. However even the most agile and well-prepared educational institutions faced a hurdle during remote learning when it came to integrity in assessing students online. This article tracks the efforts by one western university in a Middle Eastern country, tracing back the systemic changes, evolution of policies and procedures that culminated into a campus-wide response that helped redesign assessments, increased awareness among faculty towards recognising and reporting cases, and the implementation of integrity pledges. It is believed this article presents a well-rounded case study as a good practice guide for other tertiary institutions on the importance of building a culture of integrity prior to any crisis, that can help whether such situations need to arrive in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40979-022-00118-9

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Quality and Continuous improvement at UOWD
Fig. 1 Quality and Continuous improvement at UOWDCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 On-campus efforts and campaigns to foster culture of integrity (images presented with consent)
Fig. 2 On-campus efforts and campaigns to foster culture of integrity (images presented with consent)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Five principles that govern assessment design at UOWD
Fig. 3 Five principles that govern assessment design at UOWDCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Matrix of offerings for professional development at UOWD
Fig. 4 Matrix of offerings for professional development at UOWDCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Historical data of cases reported—as summarised and provided by QA unit
Fig. 5 Historical data of cases reported—as summarised and provided by QA unitCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Tracking faculty reporting of alleged cases of misconduct
Fig. 6 Tracking faculty reporting of alleged cases of misconductCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 118

  1. Almahasees Z, Khaled M, Omar, AM (2021) Faculty’s and Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470 · DOI
  2. AP (2020) More than 70 West Point cadets accused of cheating on exam. Your Army. Army Times. The Associated Press. Published 21 Dec 2020. Available URL: https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2020/12/21/more-than-70-west-point-cadets-accused-of-cheating-on-exam/
  3. Awdry R, Newton PM (2019) Staff views on commercial contract cheating in higher education: a survey study in Australia and the UK. High Educ 78:593–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00360-0 · DOI
  4. Baird M, Clare J (2017) (2017) Removing the opportunity for contract cheating in business capstones: a crime prevention case study. Int J Educ Integr 13:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0018-1 · DOI
  5. Ballantine et al (2018) Can future managers and business executives be influenced to behave more ethically in the workplace? The impact of approaches to learning on business students cheating behavior. J Bus Ethics 149(1):245–258 · DOI
  6. Beebe M (2010) E-learning in Afghanistan. Learning International Networks Consortium. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://linc.mit.edu/linc2010/proceedings/session1Beebe.pdf
  7. Bemmel MB (2014) Cheating in Online Classes: A Preliminary Investigation. Doctoral Thesis Dissertation. Nova Southeaster University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED552873.pdf
  8. Benson L, Rodier K, Enström R et al (2019) Developing a university-wide academic integrity E-learning tutorial: a Canadian case. Int J Educ Integr 15, 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0045-1 · DOI
  9. Bertram Gallant T (2008) Academic integrity in the twenty- frst century: A teaching and learning imperative. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
  10. Betram-Gallant T, Drinan P (2006) Institutionalizing academic integrity: administrator perceptions and institutional actions. NASPA J 43(4):61–81. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1723 · DOI
  11. Betta J, Owczarzak-Skomra A (2019) Agile crisis management. Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces, 51 · DOI
  12. Bjelobaba S (2020) Academic Integrity Teacher Training: Preventive Pedagogical Practices On The Course Level in Integrity in Education for Future Happiness. Ed. Khan, Hill, Folynek (2020) pp 9–18. Mendel University Press, Czech Republic · DOI
  13. Blaschke LM (2012) Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learn 13(1):56–71. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076 · DOI
  14. Brennan J, Shah T (2000) Quality assessment and institutional change: Experiences from 14 countries, Higher Education, Vol. 40
  15. Bretag T (2015 November 16-18). Who is responsible for educational integrity? Keynote Address to 7 th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, Albury- Wodonga, NSW/Victoria, Australia · DOI
  16. Bretag T, Harper R, Burton M, Ellis C, Newton P, Rozenberg R, Saddiqui S, Haeringen K.v (2019) Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students, Studies in Higher Education, 44:11, 1837-1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Brown C, Czerniewicz L, Noakes T (2016) Online content creation: looking at students’ social media practices through a Connected Learning lens. Learn Media Technol 41(1):140–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1107097 · DOI
  18. Cavalcanti ER, Pires C. Ed, Cavalcanti EP, Pires VF (2012) Detection and evaluation of cheating on college exams using supervised classification. Inform Educ 11(2):169–190 · DOI
  19. Coalter T, Lim CL, Wanorie T (2007) Factors that Influence Faculty Actions: A Study on Faculty Responses to Academic Dishonesty. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 1.1Article 12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010112 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Cronan TP, McHaney R, Douglas DE, Mullins JK (2017) Changing the academic integrity climate on campus using a technology-based intervention. Ethics Behav 27(2):89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1161514 · DOI
  21. Curtis GJ, Slade C, Bretag T, McNeill M (2021) Developing and evaluating nationwide expert-delivered academic integrity workshops for the higher education sector in Australia. High Educ Res Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1872057 · DOI
  22. Dawson MM, Overfield JA (2006) Plagiarism: do students know what it is? Bioscience Educ 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.8.1 Taylor & Francis Online · DOI
  23. Dendir S, Maxwell RS (2020) Cheating in online courses: Evidence from online proctoring. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033 · DOI
  24. Denisova-Schmidt E (2016) The Global Challenge of Academic Integrity. International Higher Education. 87:Fall 2016. 4–6. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/ihe/article/download/9494/8459/ · DOI
  25. Denzin NK (1975) The research art: The theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine, Chicago (First edition, 1970)
  26. Despeisse M (2018) Games and simulations in industrial engineering education: A review of the cognitive and affective learning outcomes. In M. Rabe, A. A. Juan, N. Mustafee, A. Skoogh, S. Jain, & B. Johansson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 winter simulation conference (pp. 446–4057). Gothenburg. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2018.8632285 · DOI
  27. du Rocher AR (2020) Active learning strategies and academic self-efficacy relate to both attentional control and attitudes towards plagiarism. Act Learn High Educ 21(3):203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418765515 · DOI
  28. Ellis C, Haeringen KV, Harper R, Bretag, et al (2020) Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data. Higher Educ Res Dev 39(3):454–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956 · DOI
  29. Emirates 24/7 (2016) Conference to tackle students cheating. Emirates 24/7 30 january 2026. https://www.emirates247.com/news/conference-to-tackle-students-cheating-2016-01-30-1.619180
  30. Finch, J (1997) Power, Legitimacy and Academic Standards, in Brennan, J. de Vries, P. and Williams, R. (Eds.) Standards and Quality in Higher Education, Higher Education Policy Series, Vol. 37, Jessica Kingsley
  31. FitzGerald E, Ferguson R, Adams A, Gaved M, Mor Y, Thomas R (2013) Augmented reality and mobile learning: the state of the art. Int J Mobile Blended Learn (IJMBL) 5(4):43–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2013100103 · DOI
  32. Freeman M, Clarkeburn H, Treleaven L, Brew A, Sachs J (2007) A collaborative approach to improving academic honesty. In: Brew A, Sachs J (eds) Transforming a University: The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice. Sydney University Press, Sydney, 153–161
  33. Gábor O, István T, Beáta, B et al (2015) Teacher enthusiasm: a potential cure of academic cheating. Front Psychol 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00318 · DOI
  34. Garrison DR, Kanuka, H (2004) Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet Higher Educ 7.2.95–105, ISSN 1096–7516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Genereux RL, McLeod BA (1995) Circumstances surrounding cheating: a questionnaire study of college students. Res High Educ 36(6):687–704 · DOI
  36. Gigliotti A, Ralph A (2019) Crisis Leadership in Higher Education: Theory and Practice. Rutgers University Press, Ithaca. https://doi.org/10.36019/9781978801868 · DOI
  37. Grodotzki J, Upadhya S, Tekkaya AE (2021) Engineering education amid a global pandemic. Adv Industrial Manuf Engineering 3:100058 · DOI
  38. Guangul FM, Suhail AH, Khalit MI, Khidhir BA (2020) Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educ Assess Eval Account. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w · DOI
  39. Hamilton M, Richardson J (2007) An academic integrity approach to learning and assessment design. J Learn Design 2(1):37–51 (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ903902.pdf) · DOI
  40. Haney S (2020) Online learning brings new challenges regarding academic dishonesty. The Lancer Feed. 5 Nov 2020. Available URL: https://lancerfeed.press/top-stories/2020/11/05/online-learning-brings-new-challenges-regarding-academic-dishonesty/
  41. Harper R, Bretag T, Rundle K (2020) Detecting contract cheating: examining the role of assessment type. High Educ Res Dev 40:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1724899 · DOI
  42. Harris L, Harrison D, McNally D, Ford C (2020) Academic integrity in an online culture: do Mccabe’s findings hold true for online, adult learners? J Acad Ethics 18:419–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09335-3 · DOI
  43. Hase S, Kenyon C (2000) From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase Articles. 5. 1–10. Available URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301339522_From_andragogy_to_heutagogy
  44. Hemby KV, Wilkinson K, Crews, TB (2006) Converting assessment of traditional classroom assignments to the e-learning environment [Electronic Version]. Online Journal for Workforce Education and Development, 2, Article 2. Available URL: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=ojwed. Accessed 9 June 2012
  45. Hendershott A, Drinan P, Cross M (2000) Toward enhancing a culture of academic integrity. NASPA J 37(4):587–598. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.111 · DOI
  46. Hill R (1995) A European student perspective on quality. Qual Higher Educ. 1:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832950010107 · DOI
  47. Hill C, Khan ZR (2021) Calling Out The Elephant In The Room: Integrity And Ethical Practices In Times Of Crises – Experience From The Middle-East. European Conference On Academic Integrity And Plagiarism 2021. Book Of Abstracts. https://academicintegrity.eu/conference/proceedings/2021/book_of_abstracts2021.pdf
  48. Hill C, Khan ZR, Kralikova V (2020) 6th International Conference PAEB2020 - First Virtual ENAI Conference. Conference Proceedings. ISBN : 9788190267991. Arif Books Distributor LLC. Dubai. UAE. https://academicintegrity.eu/conference/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Conference-Abstract.pdf
  49. Holden O, Kuhlmeier VA, Norris M (2020) Academic Integrity in Online Testing: A Research Review. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rjk7g · DOI
  50. Hou AYC, Hill C, Chen KHJ et al (2018) A comparative study of international branch campuses in Malaysia, Singapore, China, and South Korea: regulation, governance, and quality assurance. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 19:543–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9550-9 · DOI
  51. Hudd SS, Apgar C, Bronson EF, Lee RG (2009) Creating a campus culture of integrity: comparing the perspectives of full- and part-time faculty. J Higher Educ 80(2):146–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11772137 · DOI
  52. Hulsart R, McCarthy V (2011) Utilizing a culture of trust to promote academic integrity. J Continuing Higher Educ 59:92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2011.568827 Taylor & Francis Onlin] · DOI
  53. Hysaj A, Suleymanova S (2021) Safeguarding Academic Integrity in Crisis Induced Environment: A Case Study of Emirati Engineering and IT Students in a Private University in the UAE. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 236–245
  54. Janke S, Rudert SC, Petersen Ä, Fritz TM, Daumiller M (2021) Cheating in the wake of COVID-19: How dangerous is ad-hoc online testing for academic integrity?, Computers and Education Open, 2. 2021. 100055. ISSN 2666-5573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100055 · DOI
  55. Jordan AE (2001) College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics Behav 11(3):233–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3 · DOI
  56. Karam J (2018) Sustainability of International Branch Campuses: A Case Study of Management Practices in the Arabian Gulf (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/31889http://hdl.handle.net/1880/106603 doctoral thesis · DOI
  57. Keener TA, Galvez Peralta M, Smith M et al (2019) (2019) Student and faculty perceptions: appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity in health sciences education. BMC Med Educ 19:209. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1645-4 · DOI
  58. Kendall J, Kendall KE (2012) Storytelling as a qualitative method for IS research: heralding the heroic and echoing the mythic. Australasian J Informa Syst 17(2). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v17i2.697 · DOI
  59. Khan S, Kambris MEK, Alfalahi H (2022) Perspectives of University Students and Faculty on remote education experiences during COVID-19- a qualitative study. Educ Inf Technol 27:4141–4169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10784-w · DOI
  60. Khan ZR (2014) Developing a factor-model to understand the impact of factors on higher education students’ likelihood to e-cheat, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Information Systems and Technology, University of Wollongong, 2014. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4545
  61. Khan ZR (2010) 'E-cheating in the UAE: a critical review of existing literature', Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on E-Learning, E-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, & E-Government, EEE 2010, CSREA Press, USA, p 320–324
  62. Khan ZR, Sivasubramaniam S, Anand P, et al (2021) ‘e’-thinking teaching and assessment to uphold academic integrity: lessons learned from emergency distance learning. Int J Educ Integr 17, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00079-5 · DOI
  63. Khan ZR (2016) Exploring Emerging Academic Integrity Issues in Education Sector (Ed). Proceedings International Conference on Academic Integrity Middle East Chapter. University of Wollongong in Dubai. UAE
  64. Khan ZR, Mumtaz S, Rakhman SS (2020a) Mentoring to affect student perceptions of academic integrity in Academic Language and Learning Support Services in Higher Education. In: Velliaris D (ed), Ch 4. IGI Global, p 98–118. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2878-5.ch004 · DOI
  65. Khan ZR, Hemnani P, Raheja S, Joshy J (2020b) Raising Awareness on Contract Cheating –Lessons Learned from Running Campus-Wide Campaigns. J Acad Ethics 18:175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09365-2 · DOI
  66. Khan ZR, Sharma V, Thomas T (2020c) AI Triage – Helping Faltering Students Rehabilitate From Academic Misconducts in Integrity in Education for Future Happiness. In: Khan ZR, Hill C, Foltynek T (eds) Mendel University Press, Ch7. pp 90–101. ISBN 978-80-7509-771-2 · DOI
  67. Khan ZR, Samuel SD (2009) E-cheating, online sources and technologies – a critical review of existing literature. Proceedings from 9th Global Conference of Business and Economics. Cambridge University, UK. October 16 – 17
  68. King CG, Guyette RW, Piotrowski C (2009) Online exams and cheating: an empirical analysis of business students’ views. Journal of Educators Online 6(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb02693.x · DOI
  69. Knight J (2011) Three types of educational hubs: student, talent, knowledge. Are indicators useful or feasible? Observatory on Borderless Higher Education, London
  70. Krishnamurthi M, Rhode J (2018) Addressing Academic Integrity in Education and Innovation. Int J Inform Educ Techn 8(11). http://www.ijiet.org/vol8/1140-ME0018.pdf · DOI
  71. Lalilma D, Dangwal LK (2021) Blended learning: an innovative approach. Universal J Educ Res 5(1):129–136 (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124666.pdf) · DOI
  72. Lewis PJ, Hildebrandt K (2019) Storytelling as qualitative research. Foundation Sage Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036754858 · DOI
  73. Li M, Luo L, Sikdar S, Nizam NI, Gao S, Shan H, Kruger M, Kruger U, Mohamed H, Xia L, Wang G (2021) Optimized collusion prevention for online exams during social distancing. npj Sci Learn 6:5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00083-3 · DOI
  74. Lim CP, Wang L (eds) (2016) Blended learning for quality higher education: Selected case studies on implementation from Asia-Pacific. UNESCO Bangkok Office, Bangkok
  75. Lindlof TR, Taylor BC (2002) Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
  76. Lowe MS, Londino-Smolar G, Wendeln KEA et al (2018) Promoting academic integrity through a stand-alone course in the learning management system. Int J Educ Integr 14:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0035-8 · DOI
  77. Lumsden K (2018) Narratives and storytelling in qualitative research. Social Research Association. National Council for Voluntary Organizations, London
  78. Macdonald R, Carroll J (2006) Plagiarism — a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assess Eval High Educ 31(2):233–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262536Taylor&FrancisOnline · DOI
  79. Malinowski B (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
  80. McCabe DL, Trevino L (1993) Academic Dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. J Higher Educ 64:522–538
  81. McCabe DL, Feghali T, Abdallah H (2008) Academic Dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and Contextual Factors. Res High Educ 49(5):451–467 · DOI
  82. McCabe DL, Butterfield KD and Trevino LJ (2017) Cheating in College: Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do About It. John Hopkins University Press, USA. ISBN 1421424010
  83. McCall B, Shallcross L, Wilson M, Fuller C, Hayward A (2021) Storytelling as a research tool used to explore insights and as an intervention in public health: a systematic narrative review. Int J Public Health 2021(66):1604262. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021.1604262 PMID: 34795554; PMCID: PMC8592844 · DOI
  84. Meccawy M, Meccawy Z, Alsobhi A (2021) Teaching and Learning in Survival Mode: Students and Faculty Perceptions of Distance Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Sustainability. 13. 8053. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p8053-d597039.html · DOI
  85. Mellar H, Peytcheva-Forsyth R, Kocdar S et al (2018) (2018) Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: teachers’ perspectives. Int J Educ Integr 14:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x · DOI
  86. Merkel W (2021) College of confusion: An analysis of one University’s multiple plagiarism policies. System 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102399 · DOI
  87. Morris EJ, Carroll J (2016) Developing a Sustainable Holistic Institutional Approach: Dealing with Realities “on the Ground” When Implementing an Academic Integrity Policy. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_23 · DOI
  88. Morrow L (2022) Beyond the traditional: academic integrity in Canadian librarianship. In S. E. Eaton & J. Christensen Hughes (Eds.), Academic integrity in Canada: An enduring and essential challenge. Springer · DOI
  89. Newstead SE, Franklyn-Stokes A, Arrmnstead P (1996) Individual differences in student cheating. J Educ Psychol 88:229–241 · DOI
  90. Newton D (2020) Another problem with shifting education online: cheating. Higher Education. The Hechinger Report. Published 7 Aug 2020. Available URL: https://lancerfeed.press/top-stories/2020/11/05/online-learning-brings-new-challenges-regarding-academic-dishonesty/
  91. Nguyen JG, Keuseman KJ, Humston JJ (2020) Minimize Online Cheating for Online Assessments During COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00790 · DOI
  92. Nora WLY, Zhang KC (2010) Motives of cheating among secondary students: the role of self-efficacy and peer influence. Asia Pacific Educ Rev 11:573–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9104-2 · DOI
  93. Olafson L, Schraw G, Nadelson L, Nadelson S, Kehrwald N (2013) Exploring the judgement-action gap: college students and academic dishonesty. Ethics Behav 23(2):148–162 · DOI
  94. Orr J (2018) Developing a Campus Academic Integrity Education Seminar. J Acad Ethics 16, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9304-7 · DOI
  95. Orosz G, Tóth-Király I, Bőthe B, Kusztor A, Üllei Kovács Zs, Jánvári M (2015) Teacher enthusiasm: a potential cure of academic cheating. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00318 · DOI
  96. Özüdoğru G (2021) Problems faced in distance education during Covid-19 Pandemic. Participatory Educational Research 8 (4), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.92.8.4 · DOI
  97. Park C (2003) In other words: plagiarism by university students — literature and lessons. Assess Eval High Educ 28(5):471–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677Taylor&FrancisOnline · DOI
  98. Perkins M, Gezgin UB, Roe J (2020) Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education. Int J Educ Integr 16, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00052-8 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Peters MA (2019) Academic integrity: an interview with Tracey Bretag. Educ Philos Theory 51(8):751–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1506726 · DOI
  100. Pincus HS, Schmelkin LP (2003) Faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty. J Higher Educ 74(2):196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777196 · DOI
  101. Potts D (2004) Storytelling as a qualitative tool. QRCA Views 2(3):15–20. Available URL:https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.qrca.org/resource/collection/AA96A06F-BF6E-4E2C-8146-CA689849AE8B/QRCAViewsSpring04.pdf
  102. Pruvot EB, Estermann T (2018) University Governance: Autonomy, Structures and Inclusiveness. In: Curaj A, Deca L, Pricopie R. (eds) European Higher Education Area: The Impact of Past and Future Policies. Springer. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77407-7_37 · DOI
  103. Raines DA, Ricci P, Brown SL (2011) Cheating in online courses: the student definition. J Effect Teach 11(1):80–89 (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1092169.pdf)
  104. Rasmussen P (1997) A Danish Approach to Quality in Higher Education, The Case of Aalborg University, in Brennan, J. de Vries, P. and Williams, R. (eds.) Standards and Quality in Higher Education, Higher Education Policy Series, Vol. 37, Jessica Kingsley
  105. Rock P (2001) Symbolic interactionism and ethnography. In: Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lofland L (eds) Handbook of Ethnography. Sage, London, pp 477–492
  106. Rogerson AM (2016) Being AWARE about academic integrity. Higher Education Compliance and Quality Forum 2016. Higher Ed Services Pty Ltd., Australia, pp 1–37
  107. Sakamoto D, Tsuda K (2019) A detection method for plagiarism reports of students. Proc Comp Sci 159:1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.303 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Supernak J, Ramirez A, Supernak E (2021) COVID-19: How Do Engineering Students Assess its Impact on Their Learning? Advances in Applied Sociology 11:14–25. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2021.111002 · DOI
  109. Tanner L, Piper C (2010) Succumbing to temptation--to cheat or not to cheat? Faculty and student perceptions of academic integrity in distance education courses. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010, Orlando, Florida, USA
  110. Thacker EJ, McKenzie A (2022) Using quality assurance frameworks to support an institutional culture of academic integrity at Canadian universities. In S. E. Eaton & J. Christensen Hughes (Eds.), Academic integrity in Canada: An enduring and essential challenge. Springer · DOI
  111. UOWD (2020) University of Wollongong in Dubai Marks Regional Milestone, Hosts International Conference on Plagiarism across Europe and Beyond Virtually. UOWD. 4 May 2020. https://www.uowdubai.ac.ae/news/university-wollongong-dubai-marks-regional-milestone-hosts-international-conference-plagiarism
  112. Valizadeh M (2021) Cheating in Online Learning Programs: learner’s perceptions and solutions. Turkish Online J Distance Educ-TOJDE. 23.1. Article 12. ISSN 1302–6488 · DOI
  113. Vilchez, M. (2011). Cheating in Online Courses: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. 8.1. ISSN 1550–6908. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1015&context=tl_fac
  114. Vroeijenstijn AI (1995) Governments and university: opponents or allies in quality assurance? Higher Educ Rev London 27:3
  115. Vučković D, Peković S, Blečić M, Dokovic R (2020) (2020) Attitudes towards cheating behavior during assessing students᾽performance: student and teacher perspectives. Int J Educ Integ 16:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00065-3 · DOI
  116. Wheeler G (2018) The Tokyo Medical University entrance exam scandal: lessons learned. Int J Educ Integr 14:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0039-4 · DOI
  117. Wilkins S (2010) Higher education in the United Arab Emirates: an analysis of the outcomes of significant increases in supply and competition. J High Educ Policy Manag 32(4):389–400 · DOI
  118. Yap K, Nazri M, Bakar A, Zaki A, Kamalrudin M, Sidek S (2014) A review on agile decision making in crisis management. A Review on Agile Decision Making in Crisis Management 26(4):1535–1541

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Khan, Z. R., Priya, J., & Tuffnell, C.
Venue
International Journal for Educational Integrity
Published
2022-11-28
Volume
18
Issue
1
ISSN
1833-2595
Cited by
12
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review