Cited by 64Labor Law and Work DynamicsMigration and Labor DynamicsSocial and Economic Development in India

Manufactured maladies: lives and livelihoods of migrant workers during COVID-19 lockdown in India

Open access
Adhikari, Anindita, Goregaonkar, Navmee, Narayanan, Rajendran, Panicker, Nishant, Ramamoorthy, Nithya·2020·The Indian Journal of Labour Economics

Abstract

The 68 days of lockdown in India, as a measure to contain the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, unlike any other in the world. In the first half of the lockdown, migrant workers were stranded with no food and money with severe restrictions on movement when a mass exodus of workers back to their hometowns and villages began. In the second half, the workers' woes were compounded with a series of chaotic travel orders and gross mismanagement of the repatriation process. In this article, we draw on the work of Stranded Workers Action Network (SWAN) with more analysis and perspective. SWAN was a spontaneous relief effort that emerged soon after the lockdown was announced in March 2020. In addition to providing relief, SWAN concurrently documented the experiences of over 36,000 workers through the lockdown. We highlight the inadequacy of the government and judicial response to the migrant worker crisis. We present quantitative data elaborating the profile of workers that reached out to SWAN, the extent of hunger, loss of livelihoods and income. We also present qualitative insights based on interactions with workers and discuss multiple, non-exhaustive, dimensions of vulnerability to which migrant workers were exposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41027-020-00282-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stringent lockdowns in India helped slow COVID-19 spread but caused severe economic and social hardships, with GDP contracting 24% in Q2 2020 and 7.3% for 2020.

    “Stringent lockdowns in India helped to slow the spread of COVID-19 but brought about severe economic and social hardships: gross domestic product (GDP) contracted by 24% for the second quarter of 2020 and 7·3% for the year 2020.”
  • An estimated 120 million jobs were lost for the duration of the lockdown in India, and millions of migrant workers returned home under severe distress.

    “An estimated 120 million jobs were lost for the duration of the lockdown, and millions of migrant workers returned to their home villages under severe distress”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jayadev, A., S. Motiram, and V. Vakulabharanam. 2007. Patterns of Wealth Disparities in India during the Liberalisation Era. Economic & Political Weekly 42 (38): 3853–3863.
  2. Kejriwal, S. 2020. Is Jan Dhan Money Actually Reaching People? India Development Review, May 6, 2020. https://idronline.org/is-jan-dhan-money-actually-reaching-people/.
  3. Srivastava R Labour Migration in India: Recent Trends, Patterns and Policy Issues Indian Journal of Labour Economics 2011 54 3 411 440
  4. Srivastava R Social Protection for Workers in India: Struggling for Basic Rights under Increasing Labour Market Flexibility Indian Journal of Labour Economics 2012 55 2 177 199
  5. World Health Organization. 2016. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/anc-positive-pregnancy-experience/en/. 28079998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adhikari, A., Goregaonkar, N., Narayanan, R., Panicker, N., & Ramamoorthy, N.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • St. Xavier's College (IN)
  • Azim Premji University (IN)
Corresponding author
Narayanan, Rajendran
Venue
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
969-997
ISSN
  • 0019-5308 (ISSN-L)
  • 0971-7927
OpenAlex
W3093668025
Cited by
64
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
25.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Labour Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Labor Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Economic Development in India
Keywords
migrant workers, COVID-19 lockdown, repatriation, humanitarian crisis, livelihood loss, hunger, worker vulnerability, government response, judicial response, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review