Cited by 5Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detectionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Towards semi-supervised multi-modal rectal cancer segmentation: A large-scale dataset and a multi-teacher uncertainty-aware network

Qiu, Yu, Lu, Haotian, Mei, Jie, Bao, Sixu, Xu, Jing·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124734

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiu, Y., Lu, H., Mei, J., Bao, S., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Mei, Jie
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
255
Pages
124734
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400518171
Cited by
5
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20230108)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62303173)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M731803, 2023M741126)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
colorectal cancer, semi-supervised learning, multimodal learning, multi-teacher distillation, magnetic resonance imaging, knowledge transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review