CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Locating Marginalized Historical Narratives at Kingsley Plantation

Flewellen, Ayana Omilade·2017·Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/s41636-017-0005-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41636-017-0005-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Placards frequently obscure alternative ways of knowing monuments, orienting visitors to hegemonic narratives.

    “Placards frequently obscure alternative ways of knowing monuments, orienting visitors to hegemonic narratives (Flewellen 2017).”

    From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Flewellen 2017

  • Black archaeology is rooted in the tradition of Black Studies generally, and Black feminism more specifically.

    “Fundamentally, Black archaeology is rooted in the tradition of Black Studies generally, and Black feminism more specifically (Battle-Baptiste 2011; Flewellen 2017; Franklin 2001; Sterling 2015).”

    From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Flewellen 2017

  • The common ground for many Black archaeologists is African diaspora archaeology and a commitment to addressing inequality in the treatment of cultural resources and historical narratives of marginalized groups within archival spaces, through community-based research, and in field-based educational practices.

    “The common ground for many is African diaspora archaeology and a commitment to addressing inequality in the treatment of cultural resources and historical narratives of marginalized groups (Agbe-Davies 2014 ;Flewellen 2017;Martin 2019;Ogundiran and Falola 2007;Singleton 1999Singleton , 2010;;White 2010White , 2017) ) within archival spaces (Flewellen 2020), through community-based research (Agbe-D”

    From “The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter (2021) · cites this paper as Flewellen 2017

  • As Flewellen points out in the case of South Asian textiles and their role in the heritage of the African Diaspora, differences in digital infrastructure mean that many parts of the globe, especially where that heritage is most relevant, remain obscured, despite museums' attempts to provide open access through digital technologies.

    “However, as Flewellen (2017) points out in the case of South Asian textiles and their role in the heritage of the African Diaspora, differences in digital infrastructure mean that many parts of the globe, especially where that heritage is most relevant, remain obscured, despite museums' attempts to provide open access through digital technologies.”

    From The Work of Boundaries: Critical Cartographies and the Archaeological Record of the Relatively Recent Past (2022) · cites this paper as Flewellen 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Agorsah, E. Kofi 2006 The Other Side of Freedom: The Maroon Trail in Suriname. In African Re-Genesis: Confronting Social Issues in the Diaspora, Jay Haviser and Kevin MacDonald, editors, pp. 191–203. UCLA Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
  2. Agorsah, E. Kofi (editor) 2001 Freedom in Black History and Culture. Arrow Point Press, Middletown, CA.
  3. Barile, Kerri S. 2004 Race, the National Register, and Cultural Resource Management: Creating an Historic Context for Postbellum Sites. Historical Archaeology 38(1):90–100. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Battle-Baptiste, Whitney 2011 Black Feminist Archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Grove, CA.
  5. Bhattacharyya, Gargi 1998 Tales of Dark Skinned Women: Race, Gender and Global Culture. Routledge, New York, NY. · DOI
  6. Child, L. Marie 1843 Letters from New York, 2nd edition. C. S. Francis & Company, New York, NY.
  7. Christian, Barbara 1985 Black Feminist Criticism Perspectives on Black Women Writers. Pergamon Press, New York, NY.
  8. Christian, Barbara 1987 The Race for Theory. Cultural Critique 6:51–63. · DOI
  9. Croff, Raina Lynn 2009 Village des Bambaras: An Archaeology of Domestic Slavery and Urban Transformation on Gorée Island, Senegal, A.D. 17–19th Centuries. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.
  10. Deagan, Kathleen A., and Jane Landers 1999 Fort Mosé: Earliest Free African-American Town in the United States. In “I, Too, Am America”: Archaeological Studies of African-American Life, Theresa Singleton, editor, pp. 261–282. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville.
  11. Eichstedt, Jennifer L., and Stephen Small 2002 Representations of Slavery: Race and Ideology in Southern Plantation Museums. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  12. Eltis, David 2000 The Rise of African Slavery in the Americas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  13. Fairbanks, Charles 1972 The Kingsley Slave Cabins in Duval County, Florida, 1968. Conference for Historic Site Archaeology Papers 1972 7:62–93.
  14. Fairbanks, Charles 1984 The Plantation Archaeology of the Southeastern Coast. Historical Archaeology 18(1):1–14. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fennell, Christopher 2011 Carved, Inscribed, and Resurgent: Cultural and Natural Terrains as Analytic Challenges. In Revealing Landscapes, Christopher Fennell, editor, pp. 1–11. Society for Historical Archaeology, Tucson, AZ.
  16. Gable, Eric 1997 The New History in an Old Museum: Creating the Past at Colonial Williamsburg. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  17. Gibb, James G. 2000 Imaginary, but by No Means Unimaginable: Storytelling, Science, and Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 34(2):1–6. · DOI
  18. Hanger, Kimberly S. 1997 Bounded Lives, Bounded Places: Free Black Society in Colonial New Orleans, 1769–1803. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. · DOI
  19. Harding, Vincent 1981 There Is a River: The Black Struggle for Freedom in America. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY.
  20. Hartman, Saidiya 1997 Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-Making in Nineteenth-Century America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  21. Jackson, Antoinette T. 2012 Speaking for the Enslaved: Heritage Tourism at Antebellum Plantation Sites. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
  22. Jackson, Antoinette T., and Allan Burns 2006 Ethnohistorical Study of the Kingsley Plantation Community, Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve. Manuscript, National Park Service, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta, GA.
  23. Johnson, Michael P., and James L. Roark 1986 Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in the Old South. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, NY.
  24. Kelley, Robin D. 2002 Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination. Beacon Press, New York, NY.
  25. Koger, Larry 2011 Black Slave Owners: Free Black Slave Masters in South Carolina 1790–1860. McFarland & Company, Jefferson, NC.
  26. Landers, Jan. 1999 Black Society in Spanish Florida. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  27. LaRoche, Cheryl J., and Michael L. Blakey 1997 Seizing Intellectual Power: The Dialogue at the New York African Burial Ground. Historical Archaeology 31(3):84–106. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Majewski, Teresita 2000 "We Are All Storytellers": Comments on Storytelling, Science, and Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 34(2):17–19. · DOI
  29. Mallard, Kiley 2007 The Kingsley Plantation: Slavery in Spanish Florida. Florida History and the Arts 15(1):6–11.
  30. Matthews, Christopher N. 2010 The Archaeology of American Capitalism. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  31. McKittrick, Katherine 2006 Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  32. Morrison, Toni 1992 Playing in the Dark. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  33. Mullins, Paul R. 2004 African-American Heritage in a Multicultural Community: An Archaeology of Race, Culture, and Consumption. In Places in Mind: Community, Heritage, and Public Archaeology, Paul Shackel and Erve Chambers, editors, pp. 57–69. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  34. Patterson, Orlando 1991 Slavery, Alienation, and the Female Discovery of Personal Freedom. Social Research 58(1):159–187.
  35. Raz, Joseph 1986 The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
  36. Savage, Kirk 1999 Standing Soldiers, Kneeling Slaves: Race, War, and Monument in Nineteenth-Century America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  37. Schafer, Daniel L. 2003 Anna Madgigine Jai Kingsley: African Princess, Florida Slave, Plantation Slaveowner. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  38. Schmidt, Peter R., and Thomas C. Patterson (editors) 1995 Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM.
  39. Schweninger, Loren 1997 Black Property Owners in the South, 1790–1915, Vol. 82. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
  40. Sesma, Elena 2015 ‘A Web of Community’: Uncovering African American Historic Sites in Deerfield, MA. Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage 2(2):121–136. · DOI
  41. Sesma, Elena 2016 Creating Mindful Heritage Narratives: Black Women in Slavery and Freedom. Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage 5(1):38–61. · DOI
  42. Shackel, Paul A. 2001 Myth, Memory and the Making of the American Landscape. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  43. Shackel, Paul A. 2003 Memory in Black and White: Race, Commemoration, and the Post-Bellum Landscape. Left Coast Press, Walnut Grove, CA.
  44. Shepherd, Nick 2003 ‘When the Hand that Holds the Trowel is Black ...’: Disciplinary Practices of Self-Representation and the Issue of ‘Native’ Labour in Archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 3(3):334–352. · DOI
  45. Singleton, Theresa (editor) 1999 “I, Too, Am America”: Archaeological Studies of African-American Life. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville.
  46. Thiaw, Ibrahima 2011 Digging on Contested Grounds: Archaeology and the Commemoration of Slavery on Gorée Island, Senegal. In New Perspectives in Global Public Archaeology, K. Okamura and A. Matsuda, editors, pp. 127–138. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, NY. · DOI
  47. Weik, Terrance M. 2012 The Archaeology of Antislavery Resistance. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
  48. Woodson, Carter Godwin (editor) 1968 Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830: Together with Absentee Ownership of Slaves in the United States in 1830, reprint of 1924 edition. Negro Universities Press, Greenwood, NY.
  49. Wynter, Sylvia 1990 Beyond Miranda’s Meanings: Un/Silencing the ‘Demonic Ground’ of Caliban’s ‘Woman.’ In Out of the Kumbla: Caribbean Women and Literature, Carole B. Davies and Elaine S. Fido, editors, pp. 355–372. Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Flewellen, A. O.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-03
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
71-87
ISSN
  • 0440-9213
  • 2328-1103
DOI
10.1007/s41636-017-0005-7
Cited by
34
References
7
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review