The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adverse drug reactions in older adults: a narrative review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a common and potentially preventable cause of unplanned hospitalization, increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. We aimed to review the classification and occurrence of ADRs in the older population, discuss the role of age as a risk factor, and identify interventions to prevent ADRs. Methods: We performed a narrative scoping review of the literature to assess classification, occurrence, factors affecting ADRs, and possible strategies to identify and prevent ADRs. Results: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are often classified as Type A and Type B reactions, based on dose and effect of the drugs and fatality of the reaction. More recently, other approaches have been proposed (i.e. Dose, Time and Susceptibility (DoTS) and EIDOS classifications). The frequency of ADRs varies depending on definitions, characteristics of the studied population, and settings. Their occurrence is often ascribed to commonly used drugs, including anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, digoxin, insulin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Age-related factors—changes in pharmacokinetics, multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty—have been related to ADRs. Different approaches (i.e. medication review, software identifying potentially inappropriate prescription and drug interactions) have been suggested to prevent ADRs and proven to improve the quality of prescribing. However, consistent evidence on their effectiveness is still lacking. Few studies suggest that a comprehensive geriatric assessment, aimed at identifying individual risk factors, patients’ needs, treatment priorities, and strategies for therapy optimization, is key for reducing ADRs. Conclusions: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a relevant health burden. The medical complexity that characterizes older patients requires a holistic approach to reduce the burden of ADRs in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
Naranjo, C. A., Busto, U., Sellers, E. M., Sandor, P., Ruiz, I., Roberts, E. A., Janecek, E., Domecq, C., & Greenblatt, D. J. (1981) · Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.1981.154 · Cited by 11,914
By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel (2019) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.15767 · Cited by 3,163
An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success
Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y · Cited by 3,019
Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management
Edwards, I. R., & Aronson, J. K. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02799-9 · Cited by 2,979
The American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x · Cited by 2,578
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2
O'Mahony, D., O'Sullivan, D., Byrne, S., O'Connor, M. N., Ryan, C., & Gallagher, P. (2014) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afu145 · Cited by 2,397
Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions: A Systematic Review
Hazell, L., & Shakir, S. A. W. (2006) · Drug Safety · doi:10.2165/00002018-200629050-00003 · Cited by 1,931
Mangoni, A. A., & Jackson, S. H. D. (2004) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.02007.x · Cited by 1,874
Emergency Hospitalizations for Adverse Drug Events in Older Americans
Budnitz, D. S., Lovegrove, M. C., Shehab, N., & Richards, C. L. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1103053 · Cited by 1,820
Reducing Inappropriate Polypharmacy: The Process of Deprescribing
Scott, I. A., Hilmer, S. N., Reeve, E., Potter, K., Le Couteur, D., Rigby, D., Gnjidic, D., Del Mar, C. B., Roughead, E. E., Page, A., et al. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324 · Cited by 1,584
Cited by
Microalgae-based functional foods: a blue-green revolution in sustainable nutrition and health
Andrade-Bustamante, G., Martínez-Ruiz, F. E., Ortega-García, J., Renganathan, P., Gaysina, L. A., Mahendhiran, M., & Puente, E. O. R. (2025) · Applied Microbiology · doi:10.3390/applmicrobiol5020039 · Cited by 28
The problem with one-size-fits-all medicine: biological sex and the aging immune system
Baker, C., Ansere, V. A., Sanqui, C. I., & Benayoun, B. A. (2026) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003763 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Zazzara, M. B., Palmer, K., Vetrano, D. L., Carfì, A., & Onder, G.
- Venue
- European Geriatric Medicine
- Published
- 2021-03-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 463-473
- ISSN
- 1878-7649 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-7657
- OpenAlex
- W3137759031
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse drug reactions in older adults: a narrative review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s41999-021-00481-9
- The paper
- Zazzara, M. B., Palmer, K., Vetrano, D. L., Carfì, A., & Onder, G. (2021). Adverse drug reactions in older adults: a narrative review of the literature. European Geriatric Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00481-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.