CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher Talk Curbing Learner Participation in L2 Classroom Discourse: 教師語言限制學習者第二外語教室言談的參與

Pourhaji, Mostafa, Sadeghi, Michael·2021·English Teaching & Learning
DOI 10.1007/s42321-021-00077-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s42321-021-00077-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Alavi, S. M., Yaqubi, B., & Pourhaji, M. (2016). Teacher wait-time and learner initiation: a single case analysis. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 8(18), 1–18.
  2. Alexander, R. (2008). Culture, dialogue and learning: notes on an emerging pedagogy. In: N. Mercer & S.S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in schools (pp. 91–114). Los Angeles: Sage.
  3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Orlando: Hacourt Brace College Publishers.
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
  5. Can Daskin, N. (2014). Shaping learner contributions in an EFL classroom: implications for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 6(1), 33–56. · DOI
  6. Creider, S. (2013). The integration sequence: responding to child initiations in a tutoring session. Teachers College, Columbia University: Unpublished manuscript.
  7. Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: the importance of the F-move. ELT Journal, 56(2), 117–127. · DOI
  8. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Publishing. · DOI
  10. Girgin, U., & Brandt, A. (2020). Creating space for learning through ‘Mm hm’ in a L2 classroom: implications for L2 classroom interactional competence. Classroom Discourse, 11(1), 61–79. · DOI
  11. Goldberg, J. A. (2004). The amplitude shift mechanism in conversational closing sequences. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 257–298). Amsterdam: Benjamins. · DOI
  12. Guerrettaz, A. M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796. · DOI
  13. He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 568–582. · DOI
  14. Heritage, J. (1997). Conversational analysis and institutional talk: analyzing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage Publications.
  15. Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103. · DOI
  16. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  17. Ingram, J., & Elliot, V. (2014). Turn taking and ‘wait time’ in classroom interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 1–12. · DOI
  18. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: the context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), 177–201. · DOI
  20. Markee, N. (Ed.). (2015). The handbook of discourse and classroom interaction. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  21. Nguyen, H. T. (2007). Rapport building in language instruction: a microanalysis of the multiple resources in teacher talk. Language and Education, 21(4), 284–303. · DOI
  22. Paoletti, I., & Fele, G. (2004). Order and disorder in the classroom. Pragmatics, 14(1), 69–85.
  23. Pourhaji, M. (2017). Sustaining meaning-oriented contexts in EFL classroom discourse: an experimental study. Foreign Language Research Journal, 7, 53–78.
  24. Pourhaji, M. (2019). Collision of centripetal and centrifugal forces in Iranian EFL classroom interaction. In H. Nguyen & T. Malabarba (Eds.), Conversation analytic perspectives on English language learning, teaching and testing in global contexts (pp. 220–243). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. · DOI
  25. Pourhaji, M., & Alavi, S. M. (2015). Identification and distribution of interactional contexts in EFL classes: the effect of two contextual factors. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 7(15), 93–123.
  26. Pourhaji, M., Alavi, S. M., & Karimpour, S. (2016). Built-in learner participation potential of locally- and globally-designed ELT materials. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 35(3), 119–156.
  27. Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence in language, logic, and fate control: part 1. Wait time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81–94. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2011). Top notch: English for today’s world. White Plains: Pearson Education Inc..
  30. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). In another context. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 193–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  32. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: a conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.
  33. Shea, D. P. (2019). Trying to teach dialogically: the good, the bad, and the misguided. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 787–804. · DOI
  34. Skinner, B. (2017). Effective teacher talk: a threshold concept in TESOL. ELT Journal, 71(2), 150–159.
  35. ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage. · DOI
  36. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
  37. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. London: Longman Group Limited.
  38. Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6, 3–23. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. New York: Routledge. · DOI
  40. Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: language in action. Oxon: Routledge. · DOI
  41. Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. · DOI
  42. Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247–266. · DOI
  43. Waring, H. Z. (2008). Using explicit positive assessment in the language classroom: IRF, feedback, and learning opportunities. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 577–594. · DOI
  44. Waring, H. Z. (2009). Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): a single case analysis. Language Learning, 59(4), 796–824. · DOI
  45. Waring, H. Z. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities. Classroom Discourse, 2, 201–218. · DOI
  46. Waring, H. Z. (2012). “Any questions?”: investigating understanding-checks in the language classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 722–752. · DOI
  47. Waring, H. Z. (2016). Theorizing pedagogical interaction: insights from conversation analysis. New York: Routledge.
  48. Waring, H. Z. (2018). Discourse analysis: the questions discourse analysts ask and how they answer them. New York: Routledge.
  49. Waring, H. Z., Reddington, E., & Tadic, N. (2016). Responding artfully to student-initiated departures in the adult ESL classroom. Linguistics and Education, 33, 28–39. · DOI
  50. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2009). ‘Very good’ as a teacher response. ELT Journal, 63(3), 195–203. · DOI
  51. Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: a guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge. · DOI
  52. Xie, X. (2009). Why are students quiet? Looking at the Chinese context and beyond. ELT Journal, 64(1), 10–20. · DOI
  53. Yaqubi, B., & Pourhaji, R. M. (2012). Teachers’ limited wait-time practice and learners’ participation opportunities in EFL classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 4(10), 127–161.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Pourhaji, M., & Sadeghi, M.
Affiliations
  • Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Pourhaji, Mostafa
ORCID
Venue
English Teaching & Learning
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-02-15
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
397-414
ISSN
  • 1023-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 2522-8560
DOI
10.1007/s42321-021-00077-3
OpenAlex
W3131384968
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
English Teaching & Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
teacher discourse, student participation, dialogic teaching, pedagogical interaction, classroom interactional competence, EFL classroom interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Teacher Talk Curbing Learner Participation in L2 Classroom Discourse: 教師語言限制學習者第二外語教室言談的參與. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s42321-021-00077-3
The paper
Pourhaji, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2021). Teacher Talk Curbing Learner Participation in L2 Classroom Discourse: 教師語言限制學習者第二外語教室言談的參與. English Teaching & Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00077-3