The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization and image quality in CT studies: application of DRLs based on clinical indication
Open accessAbstract
The use of ionizing radiation in computed tomography (CT) has significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making. However, optimizing CT protocols is crucial to balance the diagnostic benefits with potential radiation risks, particularly for vulnerable populations. Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), introduced to guide dose optimization, highlight variations in dose indices due to local protocol differences rather than patient or equipment characteristics. This underscores the importance of standardizing technical parameters to ensure consistent image quality and minimize dose variability. Recent advancements, including iterative reconstruction algorithms and artificial intelligence, offer promising avenues for dose reduction without compromising diagnostic value. Effective optimization strategies require a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating continuous protocol evaluation, adherence to quality assurance programs, and clinical audits. Standardized DRLs tailored to clinical indications further enhance imaging practices, reducing variability and fostering safer, more effective patient care. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate, through a review of the literature and recent papers, applied to clinical practice, the role of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in CT optimization and image’s quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The implementation of DRLs is a crucial element of radiation protection protocols in medical imaging, designed to uphold the principle of optimization.70,71”
From Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
International Agency for Research on Cancer
National Cancer Institute (2020) · Definitions · doi:10.32388/pfg7jq · Cited by 9,394
Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra072149 · Cited by 8,738
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging
Vañó, E., Miller, D. L., Martin, C. J., Rehani, M. M., Kang, K., Rosenstein, M., Ortiz-López, P., Mattsson, S., Padovani, R., & Rogers, A. (2017) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1177/0146645317717209 · Cited by 1,043
Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology
Choy, G., Khalilzadeh, O., Michalski, M., Do, S., Samir, A. E., Pianykh, O. S., Geis, J. R., Pandharipande, P. V., Brink, J. A., & Dreyer, K. J. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018171820 · Cited by 800
Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction
Wang, G., Ye, J. C., & De Man, B. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z · Cited by 531
Radiological protection and safety in medicine
(1996) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/s0146-6453(00)89195-2 · Cited by 438
Smith‐Bindman, R., Wang, Y., Chu, P., Chung, R., Einstein, A. J., Balcombe, J. N., Cocker, M. R., Das, M., Delman, B. N., Flynn, M., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k4931 · Cited by 244
CT in the Emergency Department: A Real-Time Study of Changes in Physician Decision Making
Pandharipande, P. V., Reisner, A. T., Binder, W. D., Zaheer, A., Gunn, M. L. D., Linnau, K. F., Miller, C., Avery, L. L., Herring, M. S., Tramontano, A. C., et al. (2015) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150473 · Cited by 151
Tsapaki, V. (2020) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.015 · Cited by 92
Tsapaki, V., Damilakis, J. E., Paulo, G., et al. (2021) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07652-5 · Cited by 85
Machine learning: from radiomics to discovery and routine
Langs, G., Röhrich, S., Hofmanninger, J., Prayer, F., Pan, J., Herold, C., & Prosch, H. (2018) · Der Radiologe · doi:10.1007/s00117-018-0407-3 · Cited by 75
Kjelle, E., & Chilanga, C. C. (2022) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-022-01169-9 · Cited by 66
Balancing Radiation Dose and Image Quality: Clinical Applications of Neck Volume CT
Russell, M., Fink, J. R., Rebeles, F., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a0891 · Cited by 49
Seidel, J. S., Bissell, M. B., Vatturi, S., et al. (2019) · Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal · doi:10.1016/j.carj.2018.10.004 · Cited by 33
Barriers to CT Dose Optimization: The Challenge of Organizational Change
Whitebird, R. R., Solberg, L. I., Bergdall, A. R., et al. (2020) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.02.016 · Cited by 22
Dose Reduction Strategies for Pregnant Women in Emergency Settings
Picone, C., Fusco, R., Tonerini, M., Fanni, S. C., Neri, E., Brunese, M. C., Grassi, R., Danti, G., Petrillo, A., Scaglione, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12051847 · Cited by 18
Self-citationEuropean Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels for X-ray Medical Imaging (EUCLID)
Damilakis, J. E. (2019) · European Society of Radiology · doi:10.26044/esi2019/esi-0115 · Cited by 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oglat, A., Shdaifat, S., Sayah, M., Abukonna, A., & Khogali, W. (2026) · Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety · doi:10.2147/dhps.s595721
“70,71 According to ICRP Publication 135, DRLs function as investigative thresholds rather than regulatory dose limits, aimed at identifying abnormally high radiation doses in standard diagnostic and interventional procedures.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Picone, C., Porto, A., Fusco, R., Granata, C., Brunese, M. C., Granata, V., Ottaiano, A., Barretta, M., Caranci, F., Pecori, B., Sorgente, E., Salerno, S., Mormile, R., Pinto, F., Pinto, A., Magistrelli, A., & Petrillo, A.
- Affiliations
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
- IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT)
- University of Molise (IT)
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- University of Palermo (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati (IT)
- Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Picone, Carmine
- ORCID
- Venue
- Discover Applied Sciences
- Published
- 2025-05-22
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 3004-9261 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410614211
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Discover Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Keywords
- diagnostic reference levels, CT dose optimization, radiation dose reduction, image quality, iterative reconstruction, quality assurance, clinical audit, protocol standardization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
