Cited by 17Power Systems Fault DetectionPower System Optimization and StabilityElectrical Fault Detection and Protection

A Dynamic-SUGPDS Model for Faults Detection and Isolation of Underground Power Cable Based on Detection and Isolation Algorithm and Smart Sensors

Open access
Rajpoot, Sharad Chandra, Pandey, Chanki, Rajpoot, Prashant Singh, Singhai, Sanjay Kumar, Sethy, Prabira Kumar·2021·Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology

Abstract

This paper proposes a SUGPDS model based on Detection and Isolation algorithm and smart sensors, namely micro phasor measurement unit, smart sensing and switching device, phasor data concentrator, and ZigBee technology, etc. for the identification, classification, and isolation of the various fault occurs in the underground power cable in the distribution system. The proposed SUGPDS is a quick and smart tool in supervising, managing, and controlling various faults and issues and maintaining the reliability, stability, and uninterrupted flow of electricity. First, the SUGPDS model is analyzed using a distributed parameter approach. Then, the proper arrangement of the system required for the implantation of SUGPDS is demonstrated using figures. The Phasor data concentrator plays an essential role in developing the detection and classification report for identification and classification. Finally, smart sensing and switching device installed at a different location isolated the faulty phase from a healthy network. This approach helps to decrease power consumption. Hence, SUGPDS has super abilities compared to the underground power distribution system. The effectiveness of the proposed method and model is demonstrated via figures and tables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s42835-021-00715-7

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A film on the sensor cover, such as water, ice, dust, snow, or salt, can prevent objects from being detected (false negatives), from being seen (false positives), or from being correctly classified.

    “A film on the sensor cover, such as water, ice, dust, snow, or salt, can prevent objects from being detected (false negatives), from being seen (false positives), or from being correctly classified [40,41].”

    From Sensor-Based Prognostic Health Management of Advanced Driver Assistance System for Autonomous Vehicles: A Recent Survey (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

    Section 2.1.3 describes classifying underground power-cable faults from electrical measurements, not detecting objects through a sensor cover. A search for sensor-cover films, water, ice, dust, snow, salt, false positives, and false negatives found no passage addressing the claimed effects. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pavlatos C, Vita V, Ekonomou L (2015) Syntactic pattern rec- ognition of power system signals. In: Proceedings of the 19th WSEAS international conference on systems (part of CSCC '15), Zakynthos Island, Greece, pp 73-77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajpoot, S. C., Pandey, C., Rajpoot, P. S., Singhai, S. K., & Sethy, P. K.
Affiliations
Sambalpur University (IN)
Corresponding author
Pandey, Chanki
Venue
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology
Published
2021-03-17
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1799-1819
ISSN
  • 1975-0102 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-7423
OpenAlex
W3138596490
Cited by
17
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Power Systems Fault Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical Fault Detection and Protection
Keywords
underground power cables, fault detection and isolation, smart grid, phasor data concentrator, micro-phasor measurement units, ZigBee, fault classification, distribution networks, distributed parameter modeling, energy consumption reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review