Cited by 38Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSpam and Phishing DetectionText and Document Classification Technologies

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Cyberbullying-Free Online Social Networks in Smart Cities

Open access
Al-Marghilani, Abdulsamad·2022·International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems

Abstract

In recent years, smart city services have moved the existence of people from the physical to the virtual world (cyberspace), e.g., online banking, e-commerce, telemedicine, etc. Along with the benefits of smart cities, the problems of the physical world are also moved to the cyber world, like cyberbullying in online social networks (OSN). Automated cyberbullying detection techniques need to be designed to remove the potential tragedies in OSNs. The recent advent of artificial intelligence (AI) models like machine learning and deep learning (DL) models can be employed for the detection of cyberbullying in the OSN. With this motivation, this paper develops an AI-enabled cyberbullying-free OSN (AICBF-ONS) technique in smart cities. The proposed AICBF-ONS technique involves chaotic salp swarm optimization (CSSO)-based feature selection technique to derive a useful set of features from the OSN data. In addition, stacked autoencoder model is used as a classification model to allocate appropriate class labels of the OSN data. To improve the detection performance of the SAE model, a parameter tuning process take place using the mayfly optimization (MFO) algorithm. An extensive experimental analysis ensured the supremacy of the proposed AICBF-ONS technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44196-022-00063-y

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kumari, K., Singh, J.P., Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P.: Aggressive social media post detection system containing symbolic images. In: Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society, vol. 18, pp. 415-424. Springer, New York (2019)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Marghilani, A.
Affiliations
Northern Border University (SA)
Corresponding author
Al-Marghilani, Abdulsamad
Venue
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Published
2022-01-24
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
1875-6883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4207015726
Cited by
38
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, social networking sites, smart cities, salp swarm algorithm, feature selection, stacked autoencoder, mayfly optimization, metaheuristic parameter tuning, deep learning classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review