The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The use of eye mark recordings to support verbal retrospection in software testing
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adding an overlaid replay of the user's gaze path to the video playback can further facilitate the users' recall of their thoughts during the test (Hansen, 1991;Ball, Eger, Stevens, & Dodd, 2006).”
From Gaze Path Stimulation in Retrospective Think-Aloud (2008) · cites this paper as Hansen, 1991
In the citing paper
“Hansen found that the users were able to recall their thoughts during the task execution more precisely when a playback of the session was supplemented with the overlaid gaze path.”
From Gaze Path Stimulation in Retrospective Think-Aloud (2008) · cites this paper as Hansen (1991)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ericsson, 1980, Verbal reports as data, Psychological Review, 87, 215, 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215 · DOI
- Gould, 1985, Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think, Communications of the ACM, 28, 300, 10.1145/3166.3170 · DOI · Paper page
- Graf, 1987, The applicability of eye movement analysis in the ergonomic evaluation of human-computer interaction, Proceedings of Work with Display Units, 512
- Hoc, 1983, Evaluation of different modalities of verbalization in a sorting task, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 283, 10.1016/S0020-7373(83)80011-X · DOI
- Hoffman, 1987, The problem of extracting the knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology, A.I. Magazine, 53
- Leplat, 1981, Subsequent verbalization in the study of cognitive processes, Ergonomics, 24, 743, 10.1080/00140138108924896 · DOI
- Russo, 1979, A software system for the collection of retrospective protocols prompted by eye fixations, Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 11, 177, 10.3758/BF03205643 · DOI
- Wielinga, 1984, Interpretation of verbal data for knowledge acquisition, Esprit, 12
Cited by
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., & Strømsø, H. I. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.012 · Cited by 129
Gaze Path Stimulation in Retrospective Think-Aloud
Hyrskykari, A., Ovaska, S., Majaranta, P., Räihä, K.-J., & Lehtinen, M. (2008) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.2.4.5 · Cited by 118
Do You Feel the Same? On the Robustness of Cued-Recall Debriefing for User Experience Evaluation
Bruun, A., Law, E. L.-C., Nielsen, T. D., & Heintz, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3453479 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, J. P.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-49
- ISSN
- 0001-6918
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
