Cited by 356Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Analysis of possible triggers of acute myocardial infarction (the MILIS study)

Tofler, Geoffrey H., Stone, Peter H., Maclure, Malcolm, Edelman, Elazer, Davis, Vicki G., Robertson, Thomas, Antman, Elliott M., Muller, James E.·1990·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Recent documentation of a circadian variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) suggests that AMI is not a random event, but may frequently result from identifiable triggering activities. The possible triggers reported by 849 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Investigation of Limitation of Infarct Size were analyzed. Possible triggers were identified by 48.5% of the population; the most common were emotional upset (18.4%) and moderate physical activity (14.1%). Multiple possible triggers were reported by 13% of the population. Younger patients, men and those without diabetes mellitus were more likely to report a possible trigger than were older patients, women and those with diabetes. The likelihood of reporting a trigger was not affected by infarct size. This study suggests that potentially identifiable triggers may play an important role in AMI. Because potential triggering activities are common in persons with coronary artery disease, yet infrequently result in AMI, further studies are needed to identify (1) the circumstances in which a potential trigger may cause an event, (2) the specific nature of potential triggering activites, (3) the frequency of such activities in individuals who do not develop AMI and (4) the presence or absence of identifiable triggers in various subgroups of patients with infarction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90729-k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tofler, G. H., Stone, P. H., Maclure, M., Edelman, E., Davis, V. G., Robertson, T., Antman, E. M., & Muller, J. E.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Tofler, Geoffrey H.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-07
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
22-27
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125565293
Cited by
356
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HV-7-2941, N01-HV72942, N01-HV-7-2940)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction, emotional stress, physical activity, circadian variation, coronary artery disease, infarct size, diabetes mellitus, sex differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Aged, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Sleep Deprivation, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review