Cited by 566Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Diagnosing heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia using new practical criteria validated by molecular genetics

Williams, Roger R., Hunt, Steven C., Schumacher, M.Catherine, Hegele, Robert A., Leppert, Mark F., Ludwig, Erwin H., Hopkins, Paul N.·1993·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a serious disorder causing twice normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels early in childhood and very early coronary disease in both men and women. Treatment with multiple medications and diet can normalize cholesterol levels in many persons with FH and prevent or delay the development of coronary atherosclerosis. Thus, there is a need for accurate and genetically validated criteria for the early diagnosis of heterozygous FH. Previously published blood cholesterol criteria greatly underdiagnosed new cases of FH among members of known families with FH in Utah and overdiagnosed FH among participants of general population screening, revealing the need for different cholesterol screening criteria in persons from these 2 different settings. The statistical concept of a priori probabilities was applied to derive 2 sets of practical screening criteria: one for persons participating in general population screening studies and another for close relatives of confirmed FH cases, showing dramatic differences. At a cholesterol level of 310 mg/dl, only 4% of persons in the general population would have FH but 95% of persons who were first-degree relatives of known cases would have FH. Detailed tables were derived to provide practical total and low-density lipoprotein blood cholesterol screening criteria for diagnosing FH in different screening settings and specific age groups. In population screening the new FH criteria require a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90155-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FH patients used to build the classifier were diagnosed as probable or definite FH using existing diagnostic criteria including genetic testing information when available.

    “The FH patients were followed at an FH-specific clinic and had been diagnosed as probable or definite FH using existing diagnostic criteria including genetic testing information when available.5,33–36”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, R. R., Hunt, S. C., Schumacher, M. C., Hegele, R. A., Leppert, M. F., Ludwig, E. H., & Hopkins, P. N.
Affiliations
St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Williams, Roger R.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-07
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
171-176
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054119723
Cited by
566
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (U58-CCU803454)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, diagnostic criteria, a priori probability, family screening, first-degree relatives, mass screening, familial combined hyperlipidemia, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cholesterol, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Genetic Testing, Genetic Carrier Screening, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined, Male, Pedigree, Probability, Utah

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review