Cited by 380Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia in the 1999 to 2012 United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES)

Open access
de Ferranti, Sarah D., Rodday, Angie Mae, Mendelson, Michael M., Wong, John B., Leslie, Laurel K., Sheldrick, R. Christopher·2016·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: The prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is commonly reported as 1 in 500. European reports suggest a higher prevalence; the US FH prevalence is unknown. Methods and Results—: The 1999 to 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants ≥20 years of age (n=36 949) were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of FH with available Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and personal and family history of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Prevalence and confidence intervals of probable/definite FH were calculated for the overall population and by age, sex, obesity status (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ), and race/ethnicity. Results were extrapolated to the 210 million US adults ≥20 years of age. The estimated overall US prevalence of probable/definite FH was 0.40% (95% confidence interval, 0.32–0.48) or 1 in 250 (95% confidence interval, 1 in 311 to 209), suggesting that 834 500 US adults have FH. Prevalence varied by age, being least common in 20 to 29 year olds (0.06%, 1 in 1557) and most common in 60 to 69 year olds (0.85%, 1 in 118). FH prevalence was similar in men and women (0.40%, 1 in 250) but varied by race/ethnicity (whites: 0.40%, 1 in 249; blacks: 0.47%, 1 in 211; Mexican Americans: 0.24%, 1 in 414; other races: 0.29%, 1 in 343). More obese participants qualified as probable/definite FH (0.58%, 1 in 172) than nonobese (0.31%, 1 in 325). Conclusions—: FH, defined with Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria available in NHANES, affects 1 in 250 US adults. Variations in prevalence by age and obesity status suggest that clinical criteria may not be sufficient to estimate FH prevalence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018791

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extrapolations from available data estimate HeFH frequency at between 1 in 200 and 1 in 250, corresponding to 14 to 34 million cases worldwide.

    “Based on extrapolations from available data, the frequency of HeFH can be estimated to be between 1/200 and 1/250, putting the total number of cases at between 14 and 34 million worldwide. 121,298”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [298]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Ferranti, S. D., Rodday, A. M., Mendelson, M. M., Wong, J. B., Leslie, L. K., & Sheldrick, R. C.
Affiliations
  • From Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, MA (S.D.d.F., M.M.M.); Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (A.M.R., L.K.L., R.C.S.) and Division of Clinical Decision Making (J.B.W.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; and Boston University School of Medicine, MA (M.M.M.).
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2016-03-15
Volume
133
Issue
11
Pages
1067-1072
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2302032525
Cited by
380
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 36
FWCI
58.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
familial hypercholesterolemia, prevalence, LDL cholesterol, premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, obesity, racial and ethnic differences, age differences, United States adults, NHANES, underdiagnosis, hypercholesterolemia screening, family history of cardiovascular disease, sex differences, body mass index, cardiovascular risk stratification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Sex Factors, United States, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review