Cited by 18Cardiac Health and Mental HealthPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHealth, psychology, and well-being

RETRACTED: Changes in degree of sclerosis as a function of prophylactic treatment in cancer-prone and CHD-prone probands

Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H., Gallasch, G., Vetter, H., Frentzel-Beyme, R.·1991·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

One-hundred and ninety-two probands were selected on the basis of personality questionnaires as being cancer-prone (100) or CHD-prone (92). They were then randomly divided into a control and a treatment group, the latter receiving a special kind of behaviour therapy attempting to change the personality patterns in the direction of a healthier, more autonomous personality. Follow-up after 10 and 13 years disclosed significantly lower death rates in probands receiving prophylactic treatment than in controls. Of special interest was the degree of sclerosis in the fundus of the eye, rateds on a 3-point scale. This was significantly higher prior to therapy in the CHD-prone group than in the cancer-prone group. Treatment reduced the degree of sclerosis, particularly in the CHD group; lack of treatment was followed by an increase in sclerosis. Similar but less marked changes were found in the cancer-prone group. Clearly psychological treatment affects significantly bodily functions associated with CHD. Other risk factors considered were systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood cholesterol and blood sugar, all of which, together with personality, influenced the degree of sclerosis observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0005-7967(91)90070-jThis paper is marked retracted.

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H., Gallasch, G., Vetter, H., & Frentzel-Beyme, R.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
343-351
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966918685
Cited by
18
References
31
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
coronary artery disease, personality change, psychological intervention, cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure, serum cholesterol, blood glucose, mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Type A Personality, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review