Cited by 130Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

Recovery of browse-sensitive tree species following release from white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus zimmerman browsing pressure

Anderson, Roger C., Katz, Alan J.·1993·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90713-b

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, R. C., & Katz, A. J.
Affiliations
Illinois State University (US)
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
203-208
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091868605
Cited by
130
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
white-tailed deer, deer browsing, Tsuga canadensis, sugar maple, exclosures, forest regeneration, shade tolerance, northern Wisconsin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review