CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 589Regulation of Appetite and ObesityBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The taste reactivity test. II. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in chronic thalamic and chronic decerebrate rats

Grill, Harvey J., Norgren, Ralph·1978·Brain Research
DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90569-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The taste reactivity test described in the preceding paper was used to begin determining the capacity of brain stem structures to execute and regulate ingestive behavior. Both chronic thalamic and chronic decerebrate rat preparations were examined repeatedly, and their gustatory mimetic responses compared through frame-by-frame videotape analysis with the responses of neurologically normal controls. In response to orally injected taste stimuli, chronic decerebrate rats executed the same mimetic response components, and very similar response sequences observed in intact rats. In contrast, all taste stimuli elicited a quinine-like rejection sequence from chronic thalamic rats. In thalamic rats mimetic responses associated with ingestion were completely absent. Based on the similarities in the ingestion and rejection responses of decerebrate and intact rats, it appears that discriminative responses to taste result from integrative mechanisms complete within, or caudal to, the midbrain. Since decerebrate rats have the capacity to execute both ingestion and rejection response sequences, neural mechanisms rostral to the midbrain in some way suppress ingestion and/or releaser ejection responses in the thalamic preparation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90569-3

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bard, 1939, Central nervous mechanisms for emotional behavioral patterns in animals, Res. Publ. Ass. nerv. mes., 19, 190
  2. Grill, 1975, Sucrose as an aversive stimulus, Neurosci. Abstr., 1, 525
  3. Jackson, 1898, Relations of different divisions of the central nervous system to one another and to parts of the body, Lancet, 1, 79

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–589 of 589

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Grill, H. J., & Norgren, R.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
ORCID
Grill, Harvey J.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-03
Volume
143
Issue
2
Pages
281-297
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0006-8993(78)90569-3
OpenAlex
W1989396341
Cited by
588
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
taste reactivity, ingestion, taste aversion, thalamic lesions, decerebrate preparation, brainstem, midbrain, ingestive behavior, taste discrimination
MeSH terms
Animals, Decerebrate State, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drinking Behavior, Hydrochloric Acid, Male, Methods, Mouth, Quinine, Sodium Chloride, Sucrose, Taste, Thalamus, Tongue, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review